Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Has anyone else noticed that portrait mode isn’t able to accurately taken pictures of birds, or love birds specifically?

No matter what I do, the eyes look demonic or half his head is out of focus
Ouch, that looks like the effects of software driven bokeh (background blur), on a SLR camera it's hard enough to get a shallow depth of focus on smaller subjects, even in decent light with a fast lens.
 
dfe6cb3748d5b31868e266d5b9c02430.jpg
 
I grew up with birds. Amazon parrots and African Greys and sun conures. None of these were mine (my sisters birds). Why? I can’t stand bird that can bite. My bird of choice growing up were parakeets and pigeons. Neither can harm if they bite. Had a pigeon for 7 years and last year got a pair of racing pigeons from a local breeder as babies - hand fed them (wife and I did). We also rescued a cockatiel who is super tame now. Pigeons love to cuddle and hang around us as we work in the office. Their birdy diapers keep it clean. But yeah can’t stand birds that bite.

'Pigeons' they are Doves. That God sent to be a connection between Heaven and Earth.



Anyhow sorry to get 'heavy' I think the Gemini from Planet Computers UK is ideal for you as a blogger, what do you think?
[doublepost=1511233240][/doublepost]
View attachment 737139 View attachment 737137

Kids, Don’t try this at home. It won’t end well.

The final picture was shot with a Panasonic point and shoot.

If you have an iPhone 7 and X compare the delays between the button and shutter trigger, you might be shocked at the difference
If that is a live Parott, then you should not be dressing him up as Santa Claus.
You should know these living breathing God sent gifts are not to be treated like a 'Punch and Judy Show'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
'Pigeons' they are Doves. That God sent to be a connection between Heaven and Earth.



Anyhow sorry to get 'heavy' I think the Gemini from Planet Computers UK is ideal for you as a blogger, what do you think?
[doublepost=1511233240][/doublepost]
If that is a live Parott, then you should not be dressing him up as Santa Claus.
You should know these living breathing God sent gifts are not to be treated like a 'Punch and Judy Show'.

That is a female parrot. The males are a stunning green with candy corn beaks.

My bird is spoiled rotten. She can give us one crazy picture and an hour each year. Otherwise I will show her the door and she can fly the coop
 
  • Like
Reactions: deany
Sorry wasn't feeling well last night, definitely tonight I'll get some portrait pics of my grey and senegal.

Btw, anyone remember the show catdog??? 🙂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wackery
Has anyone else noticed that portrait mode isn’t able to accurately taken pictures of birds, or love birds specifically?

No matter what I do, the eyes look demonic or half his head is out of focus

It's not exactly a lighting issue per se. The problem is that in low light, the camera app still uses a really slow shutter speed so that it minimizes the ISO speed. A faster shutter will require a faster ISO which will then created noise in the photo. A slow shutter is bad for things that are moving. Your bird is most likely making small, but quick movements of its' head. That will cause blur in your photo. You can try to increase the amount of light in your photos to get a faster shutter speed so that motion can be frozen. Otherwise, you got to trigger at the exact moment your bird is perfectly still. It's not all the different with people. Professional models are trained to "hold that pose" perfectly still for several seconds.
 
Here we go. Grey hates phones which is why she’s a bit fluffled up and the Senegal likes to dance because ya know.

As you can see the software based bokeh is picky/choosy. You can have really shallow depth of field or not. Overall not bad, but its not DSLR.

To the op, have you replicated the issue with one particular spot blurred out?

F4F3C0C4-1930-426F-AEBB-8827E861B72B.jpeg
F87ED2F0-D55F-48F8-9C7F-4FE6EC5519B3.jpeg
328C2256-E8CF-4C0E-8E0A-BC1667604FC1.jpeg

[doublepost=1511298801][/doublepost]Here’s some macro shots where it doesn't do so good, definitely not shallow depth of field at all..

0744EADE-9DD1-4042-9E17-594FC453463B.jpeg
8C897220-0CA6-4C5E-9E23-3158B3465DC2.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Wackery
Here we go. Grey hates phones which is why she’s a bit fluffled up and the Senegal likes to dance because ya know.

As you can see the software based bokeh is picky/choosy. You can have really shallow depth of field or not. Overall not bad, but its not DSLR.

To the op, have you replicated the issue with one particular spot blurred out?

View attachment 737446 View attachment 737449 View attachment 737450
[doublepost=1511298801][/doublepost]Here’s some macro shots where it doesn't do so good, definitely not shallow depth of field at all..

View attachment 737451 View attachment 737453

One word, stunning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjruiz2
Here we go. Grey hates phones which is why she’s a bit fluffled up and the Senegal likes to dance because ya know.

As you can see the software based bokeh is picky/choosy. You can have really shallow depth of field or not. Overall not bad, but its not DSLR.

To the op, have you replicated the issue with one particular spot blurred out?

View attachment 737446 View attachment 737449 View attachment 737450
[doublepost=1511298801][/doublepost]Here’s some macro shots where it doesn't do so good, definitely not shallow depth of field at all..

View attachment 737451 View attachment 737453
yes, usually just the bird’s face
 
An African Grey, taken in deep shade at the local zoo, through fine bird mesh, using a DSLR and macro-lens. She loved my camera and kept on coming up really close for me. To expect this sort of focus fall-off from a mobile phone is silly. It takes real optics to achieve it. An emulation is just that, an attempted copy of something.

_MG_7308-X3.jpg
 
An African Grey, taken in deep shade at the local zoo, through fine bird mesh, using a DSLR and macro-lens. She loved my camera and kept on coming up really close for me. To expect this sort of focus fall-off from a mobile phone is silly. It takes real optics to achieve it. An emulation is just that, an attempted copy of something.

_MG_7308-X3.jpg
I love all God's creatures, if you were to ask me the bottom of list it would be ......
























Humans. aka
Homo sapiens
 
Has anyone else noticed that portrait mode isn’t able to accurately taken pictures of birds, or love birds specifically?

No matter what I do, the eyes look demonic or half his head is out of focus
I don't think it's to do with the birds. I tried to use portrait mode for the first time while taking a picture of a LEGO sculpture, and it does the same thing where the edge of the object is out of focus even though it's in the same plane where the camera should be focusing. My theory is this is because the iPhone's portrait mode is mostly controlled by software reconciling the two images created from the wide angle and telephoto lens, rather than true shallow depth of field that can be created by a single large aperture. So in this case the software is looking for a human face, but is confused because it can't find one.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.