I am honestly confused with comments like this - and I don’t want to argue or anything, just expressing my confusion.
For me, Touch ID is completely unreliable. Maybe it’s my fingers or something, but every time the weather changes, every time my hands are damp, and several times a week without any good reason - Touch ID would fail. At best, it works around 80% of the time, at worst it’s around 40-50. And I had it on my iPhone, and still have it on iPad Pro and MBP - all 2nd gen Touch ID.
And not just me, that has been the experience of several of my friends. We even nicknamed Touch ID as Repeat ID, because you always have to try several times to get it to work.
Face ID, on the other hand, failed only when I got out of the bed this morning and that’s it. It’s consistenly reliable.
So, I believe you feel the way you do and maybe your experience is different (biometrics are different with different people), it’s just really strange to me.
[doublepost=1511624238][/doublepost]
Sure it does, but so do bigger screens or even faster chips. We live in a physical world and heck, even.... breathing has some tradeoffs, when you think about inhaling every dust particle, potential airborne virus or bacteria around you. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t breathe 🙂 Or that Face ID isn’t vastly superior to Touch ID because (in my opinion, feel free to disagree) it most definitely is.
But there is no alternative to breathing. I don't even think humans can force themselves not to breath even if they tried. Even when you sleep, you're breathing and you're not even aware of it. Unless you drowned, suffocated because you were trapped in a plastic bag or were at such a high altitude that there was literally no oxygen to breath in, then you woukd stop breathing. So there really is no option and no trade off to breathing. But there is an alternative to Face ID.
My point is, most of the answers in this thread only tell half the story. Sure Face ID may be more convenient than Touch ID, but the cost of that convenience is that you lose convenience on the flip side when you need to access control centre several times a day.
If you asked two business owners how much they grossed in a year and buiness owner A showed his books which disclosed sales of $100,000 per year and business owner B's books disclosed sales of $150,000 per year, you would conclude there and then that business B was the more successful business. But you'd be foolish to buy that business based on sales alone because you don't know what each incurs in expenses to generate those sales. If you then wised up and asked both owners to disclose their costs, and A's costs were $20,000 and B's costs were $72,000, only then can you draw a conclusion on which business was more profitable.
Asking X users if they think Face ID is more convenient without factoring in the trade-off is, in my opinion, misleading to the non X user. Let's face it, Touch ID was not that bad, we all loved it, it was fast, accurate and just worked. Is Face ID so much faster and that much more convenient that it is worth the extra hassle of swiping down from the top every time you want to check your battery? I'm not sure about that. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. It will come down to preference. But certainly to not even acknowledge the inconvenience on the flip side is only telling half the story. I know one thing, swiping down often enough if you're desperate to know your battery percentage will flatten it quicker.
Where's the convenience in that?
Again, the answers in this thread only tell half the story.
If, strictly, we're only interested in Face ID over Touch ID, then sure, Face ID may be more convenient for some, or even most. But anyone who doesn't look at the complete picture is only being foolish.