It's called a price drop, and negotiating prices.... Mind blown.
*whoosh*
(obviously you didn't read what I was responding to)
It's called a price drop, and negotiating prices.... Mind blown.
There's a whole plethora of small upgrades on the XS, including a RAM bump, better waterproofing, faster LTE chip, better speakers and mics, bigger camera sensor, stronger cover glass, faster Face ID, not to mention all the ongoing software/services/security development, most of which comes included in the price of the phone but is absolutely not free to produce. In what world does that necessitate a price drop? By all means, go complain on the Mac Pro thread about old tech not being discounted enough, but doing it here just makes you look ignorant.
Price is how much the end user will pay.
Taptic and its not even close.It's funny how the Taptic engine takes up probably as much or more space than a headphone jack... Would you rather have a headphone jack, or the Taptic engine?
It's not a higher price. It's the same price as last year, which was more expensive than previous iPhones almost exclusively because of the OLED screen and stainless chassis.None of these probably REDEVELOPED from the ground-up to increase the cost from where it was last. All the mentioned areas were already in use with frameworks and foundation (iOS) in place. All these earlier features realized its profits all these years and months....Hence the question.
If it is a bendable mobile, holographic display options etc....requires complete research, testing and development hence higher price can be justified. For evolutionary features...?
That's not what I was taught in any of my econ classes. Not saying you are wrong, I'm saying that isn't what they were teaching in Macro, Micro, or Engineering Econ when I took it.
Well, for starters...everything isn't the same. New camera sensors, new IP68 rating, better contrast screen, new microphones, new battery and design, and of course the A12 with a neural engine doing 5T operations/sec up from 600B (8X increase).So... Except for the CPU upgrade, the Xs is last year's technology and design. Can someone please explain to me why the price of the phone hasn't gotten cheaper?
All the internals really are getting smaller. Except the battery.
Apple and other phone manufacturers did the protruding camera to sell cases. They are all thinking of ways for you to get you to accessories and this is a great idea from a marketing standpoint!Actually, I'd be all-in for that... I'd take the phone without the taptic engine and the whole front camera thing, i.e. the notch can be removed as well. Instead put Touch ID on the back. Dual-Cam is also overrated. Phone can be 1,5mm thicker, I don't mind... still better than protruding camera.
And, yes, I'm well aware that will never happen...
None of these probably REDEVELOPED from the ground-up to increase the cost from where it was last. All the mentioned areas were already in use with frameworks and foundation (iOS) in place. All these earlier features realized its profits all these years and months....Hence the question.
If it is a bendable mobile, holographic display options etc....requires complete research, testing and development hence higher price can be justified. For evolutionary features...?
I don't know why people expect a full redesign every single year. The iPhone is a mature product, at some point we will be lucky to even get yearly updates. (Mac mini anyone?)So... Except for the CPU upgrade, the Xs is last year's technology and design. Can someone please explain to me why the price of the phone hasn't gotten cheaper?
Aren't you confusing battery and french word "pile"? Batteries can be single cell.
Or I dunno, they could make it just a few millimeters thicker and greatly increase the battery capacity.Amazing how much is squeezed into one device. Can you guys imagine what would be possible with an innovation/breakthrough for "micro-batteries"?
There's a whole plethora of small upgrades on the XS, including a RAM bump, better waterproofing, faster LTE chip, better speakers and mics, bigger camera sensor, stronger cover glass, faster Face ID, not to mention all the ongoing software/services/security development, most of which comes included in the price of the phone but is absolutely not free to produce. In what world does that necessitate a price drop? By all means, go complain on the Mac Pro thread about old tech not being discounted enough, but doing it here just makes you look ignorant.
Or I dunno, they could make it just a few millimeters thicker and greatly increase the battery capacity.
Why not both? I never bought the "courage" BS. Real courage would be to make it a few mm thicker and keep the audio jack and give it a bigger battery.It's funny how the Taptic engine takes up probably as much or more space than a headphone jack... Would you rather have a headphone jack, or the Taptic engine?
Individual preferences of course. They could have kept/evolved the SE line, but that has moved on to Apple mythology, to be told in hushed whispers around the campfire.No, no, he's right. Look at all those black squares, they look the same as last year's black squares! lol.
[doublepost=1537457351][/doublepost]
You know I also used to believe this, but coming from an iPhone 6 to an iPhone X last year, the thicker X was quite noticeable. The weight too. I'm now a Jony Ive follower that thinner and lighter is better!
What an amazing example of micro- and nano-packaging engineering in display. The XS just rocks inside.
After teardown of so many nano-bits and pieces -- will anyone be able to reassemble the XS back together? And, have it work and preserve water- and dust-tightness?
Do not think so.
Why not both? I never bought the "courage" BS. Real courage would be to make it a few mm thicker and keep the audio jack and give it a bigger battery.
I agree and what is important is how long the phone will last between charge and the lifespan (for those who keep their phone longer than 2 yrs).I seems that this entire article has sparked a small debate about the battery. It's as simple as this folks: Apple took two individual cells from the iPhone X and wrapped them up in a single package. It's still two cells (or more) and it's still probably superior to or less costly than the iPhone X battery to produce. Now it just has one part number and one connection, etc.
I think it’s a testament to how good the iPhone X truly was last year..
There is a reason Apple didn’t sell it for 899.99 along side the 2018 offerings lol
No one would have bought the XS.