jon9091
macrumors 6502
If you’re a fan of high oil prices…you loved that speech.
You have to have your head in the sand if you seriously can't see that gas prices have gone up. Wow. I find that truly astonishing.We do not know that yet. Rising gas prices can also lead to demand destruction as well.
Trump was the one that lied that the regime has been changed. Lying is what he does.I stated why the regime must be removed, I didn't say it was
It is always amazing to me to see how many lies Trump supporters are willing to defend, even when it hurts them.If you’re a fan of high oil prices…you loved that speech.
Why do you include American Liberals? This is so sad you think that...Iran's allies will support this. Those allies being Russia, China, North Korea and American liberals
But you can’t. Just like Trump can only be Trump because he is backed by a significant amount of Americans, the “regime” is not just a few people at the top. It is a regime because it is backed by a significant number of religious fanatics. You can’t just disrupt the regime and then pull out. A new regime would pop up in it’s place. Iran is 90 million people - are you going to eradicate them all? I don’t have to spell out who that would make you compared to.You basically just stated why the regime must be removed
This is exactly why Trump is in office. That’s why I used the term “brainwashed” earlier.Why do you include American Liberals? This is so sad you think that...
And if he wasn’t more extreme before, he definitely is now.The regime has not been removed.
The 86 year old ayatollah that was already dying of cancer was replaced by his son who is 30 years younger and by all accounts even more extreme.
Brilliant!
Any act is not a good act. However bad you think it was becoming, Trump’s actions have made it worse, not better.Iran has killed scores of Americans, have sleeper cells in the U.S. and Europe, finance and support terror proxies, and CNN televised their trip to Missile City in Iran. They claimed their current missiles weren't mid range, then they sent one to Diego Garcia, twice the claimed distance.
Sometimes you have to act before things get worse, and they would have.
Head in the sand isn't a real world strategy.
You keep talking about what happened 47 years ago. Are you aware of why the Islamic revolution happened?Their military has been severely downgraded. Know now that they had missiles with twice the distance they said before, you would feel better leaving the regime in place and allowing them to finally get the ballistic missile able to reach the U.S. and add a nuclear warhead to it?
NATO is bey9ind worthless and now they have proven it, so we will spend less money defending worthless allies and more money on our own military. Win-win.
There comes a time when nations have to act and Iran has been at war with us for 47 years, this time we have someone in Office who will finally meet that threat, not hand them billions of dollars like Obama The Appeaser and DEI Joe.
Their military has been severely downgraded. Know now that they had missiles with twice the distance they said before, you would feel better leaving the regime in place and allowing them to finally get the ballistic missile able to reach the U.S. and add a nuclear warhead to it?
NATO is bey9ind worthless and now they have proven it, so we will spend less money defending worthless allies and more money on our own military. Win-win.
There comes a time when nations have to act and Iran has been at war with us for 47 years, this time we have someone in Office who will finally meet that threat, not hand them billions of dollars like Obama The Appeaser and DEI Joe.
You basically just stated why the regime must be removed
Why doesn’t the US administration consider Russia a greater threat than Iran? Because by your measures it should, it does everything Iran does but more and ramped up to eleven.Iran has killed scores of Americans, have sleeper cells in the U.S. and Europe, finance and support terror proxies, and CNN televised their trip to Missile City in Iran. They claimed their current missiles weren't mid range, then they sent one to Diego Garcia, twice the claimed distance.
Sometimes you have to act before things get worse, and they would have.
Head in the sand isn't a real world strategy.
Wow, you bought the whole package from Trump didn't you? NATO isn't a do-whatever-the-US-wants alliance. It's a defence pact. If Trump wanted allies he should have built an alliance like GB and GWB did, and not insulted and tariffed and threatened to invade his allies. But he didn't want allies did he? He wanted to be the big **** on the world stage and do a sneak attack on the Iranians while they were foolish enough to try negotiating with him.Their military has been severely downgraded. Know now that they had missiles with twice the distance they said before, you would feel better leaving the regime in place and allowing them to finally get the ballistic missile able to reach the U.S. and add a nuclear warhead to it?
NATO is bey9ind worthless and now they have proven it, so we will spend less money defending worthless allies and more money on our own military. Win-win.
There comes a time when nations have to act and Iran has been at war with us for 47 years, this time we have someone in Office who will finally meet that threat, not hand them billions of dollars like Obama The Appeaser and DEI Joe.
Why would the US administration consider Iran a greater threat than Russia? Because by your measures it should, it does everything Iran does but more and ramped up to eleven.
Russia has nuclear weapons, it has repeatedly threatened to use them, it has ballistic missiles capable of reaching the US, it has actively invaded a neighbouring country, it conducts considerable cyber attacks and espionage, it uses sleeper cells, and it meddles in US and other countries elections.
It can’t be that ‘it’s not in my back yard’, because neither is Iran.
I understand that US prices have risen far less than elsewhere. In addition, it's anticipated that there will be a knock-on with everything else being affected due to rising delivery costs. There has been a tremendous reception in the UK media to the Artemis 2 launch. The people around this represent the best of America and we try to hold on to these thoughts despite the put-downs from Hegseth and Trump at this time. I am old enough to remember the Apollo launches and the image I had of the US that stayed with me through most of my life until the Trump era.You have to have your head in the sand if you seriously can't see that gas prices have gone up. Wow. I find that truly astonishing.
This is getting nowhere because you just change the goal posts -- presenting misinformation and then changing your argument once corrected. You literally said there is "rampant" inflation. I presented you with evidence to the contrary. Gas prices are quite obviously up. But, just so you know, gas prices are just one input to inflation. Go to the Federal Reserve website if you doubt any of what I am saying.You have to have your head in the sand if you seriously can't see that gas prices have gone up. Wow. I find that truly astonishing.
From which information do you understand that? The numbers I can find shows US gas prices up by 40% vs 20% in most western countries. US increase is lower in dollars, but much higher as a percentage, since the US price is so much lower (less than half, even after the price hike).I understand that US prices have risen far less than elsewhere. In addition, it's anticipated that there will be a knock-on with everything else being affected due to rising delivery costs. There has been a tremendous reception in the UK media to the Artemis 2 launch. The people around this represent the best of America and we try to hold on to these thoughts despite the put-downs from Hegseth and Trump at this time. I am old enough to remember the Apollo launches and the image I had of the US that stayed with me through most of my life until the Trump era.
Oil prices will affect lots of things other than gas, but if course there is a delay in official numbers. You are the one hiding behind semantics here.This is getting nowhere because you just change the goal posts -- presenting misinformation and then changing your argument once corrected. You literally said there is "rampant" inflation. I presented you with evidence to the contrary. Gas prices are quite obviously up. But, just so you know, gas prices are just one input to inflation. Go to the Federal Reserve website if you doubt any of what I am saying.
The Steve that does not rely on the straw man fallacies is the winner here. So its 333 over 62388 in this case.Why doesn’t the US administration consider Russia a greater threat than Iran? Because by your measures it should, it does everything Iran does but more and ramped up to eleven.
Semantics? It's a literal fact. If there was "rampant" inflation the Federal Reserve would be raising interest rates ... like they did under Biden. We may experience serious inflation at some point in the future, but to make that claim right now is just wrong. Anyway, it is interesting (and sad) to me that some people would exchange national security in exchange for $1 at the gas pumps.Oil prices will affect lots of things other than gas, but if course there is a delay in official numbers. You are the one hiding behind semantics here.
Iran was illegally and offensively attacked by America and Israel. Iran has a right to defend itself. And that means any American corporation, which is helping the American military or Israeli military, qualifies as a legitimate military target under the law of armed conflict (LOAC), also known as International Humanitarian Law.The report said the Telegram post listed 18 companies that Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps views as "legitimate targets," including Apple, Microsoft, Google, Meta, IBM, Cisco, Tesla, Boeing, Nvidia, J.P. Morgan, and others.
Israel is not subject to the War Powers Act. And the American action against Iran has not violated it based on well established precedent. So, your premise is wrong. And to support attacks on civilians and private enterprise is to support war crimes. Not a good look.Iran was illegally and offensively attacked by America and Israel. Iran has a right to defend itself. And that means any American corporation, which is helping the American military or Israeli military, qualifies as a legitimate military target under the law of armed conflict (LOAC), also known as International Humanitarian Law.
If you want to pay higher gas prices to support some BS war - go ahead. I, and a lot of the others here won't join you in that. You even admit that we may experience serious inflation, you admit that gas prices are going up, but you still support it. A lot of people are struggling right now and this kind of logic is basically telling them "let them eat cake". You are either severely misinformed, or you are 100% into MAGA Propaganda. This is a very tone deaf statement to make.Semantics? It's a literal fact. If there was "rampant" inflation the Federal Reserve would be raising interest rates ... like they did under Biden. We may experience serious inflation at some point in the future, but to make that claim right now is just wrong. Anyway, it is interesting (and sad) to me that some people would exchange national security in exchange for $1 at the gas pumps.
I am neither MAGA nor misinformed. Care to guess again? You seem to measure national security by the price of gas. Is that a logical position? I, and many others, do not think so. For example, would Ukrainians take that position? A modicum of reflection before typing might help you here.You are either severely misinformed, or you are 100% into MAGA Propaganda. This is a very tone deaf statement to make.
You seem to measure national security on the word of a 34 times convicted felon. Is that a logical position?You seem to measure national security by the price of gas