Personally, I would get 4gb. However, this person already has an i5 17" mbp and a 2009 imac. So, they don't really need the higher specs. If they want to do something intensive, they have the hardware.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)
I got 2gb ram and have found this machine comparatively as fast as my 4gb MacBook pro it really zips through things. I was beginning to worry I had bought the wrong amount of ram reading some of comments here but am delighted with performance and it's way faster than the huge pc I am forced to use at work.
2gb of RAM is plenty for 85% of computer users. If you think what you do resides in the top 15% of all computer users, then spring for the RAM.
But what kind of apps are you normally running?Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)
I got 2gb ram and have found this machine comparatively as fast as my 4gb MacBook pro it really zips through things. I was beginning to worry I had bought the wrong amount of ram reading some of comments here but am delighted with performance and it's way faster than the huge pc I am forced to use at work.
As an owner of a RevB SSD, I would not touch another MBA w/out 4gb. I really don't care what anyone says.
I'd say if you want it to last go for the RAM upgrade. Nobody really knows what Lion will bring and it may be beneficial in the long run. When you're spending this much on a computer, what's an extra $100?
Under certain types of multitasking, that could be somewhere near a 25% increase in performance.
Good point. 10% for this kind of increase is peanuts. I would also argue that 10% for going from 1.4 GHz to 1.6 GHz isn't that bad of an idea. Remember, this is dual core, so that's a 14% speed increase per processor. Under certain types of multitasking, that could be somewhere near a 25% increase in performance.
Which upgrade you think will be most significant:
1.86GHz -> 2.13GHz
or
2GB -> 4GB
Which upgrade you think will be most significant:
1.86GHz -> 2.13GHz
or
2GB -> 4GB
I have a question concerning page ins and page outs. After doing some reading I understand the basic principle involved. My question is I have a Macbook air 13" base model. When I look at the activity monitor there are 420MB of page ins and 24 kb of page outs. That number changes a bit as I use the computer through the day. I know most everyone is recommending 4gb of ram. However with 2gb I have opened 9 programs on one bounce of the dock icon. I can detect no slow down at all of anything I use. I can return my 13" base for 4gb or ram but if they charge me restocking the total could exceed $200+. The Apple person at the store says 2GB is plenty. So how important are the page ins and outs. What numbers would be of a concern?
24 kb of page-outs is next to zero which is perfectly fine. My 2gb RAM macbook has around a 20:1 ratio for my use. In your case of amount of page-ins that would make it 24 Mb of page-outs instead of 24 kb. Even still I don't have a lot of problems with it so you'll be more than ok.
I have another question.....maybe stupid but....will a mba with 128GB run faster than a mba with 256GB?
Which upgrade you think will be most significant:
1.86GHz -> 2.13GHz
or
2GB -> 4GB
The Apple person at the store says 2GB is plenty. So how important are the page ins and outs. What numbers would be of a concern?