why isnt the 128GB version "upgradable" to 2.13GHz? Does that mean anything about how unnecessary having 2.13GHz is on this machine?
why isnt the 128GB version "upgradable" to 2.13GHz? Does that mean anything about how unnecessary having 2.13GHz is on this machine?
However, for many people the issue is not the money, but the BTO wait time.
After reading 3 pages of debates between the "2 GB" and "4 GB" camps, I have the following conclusions:
From the "4 GB" camp:
1. Many the people supporting 4 GB have not received (or not ordered) their 4 GB-MBAs. Many based their decision on previous experience of older MBAs. Others use the future-proof argument... although the resell-lost usually is greater for more expensive models.
2. The point about the relatively inexpensive option to go to 4 GB was stated over and over again. However, for many people the issue is not the money, but the BTO wait time.
From the "2 GB" camp:
1. Those that did buy the new MBA with 2 GB seemed to be happy with not having 4 GB. No one claimed that they really regretted. Either they are truly happy with 2 GB, or they didn't want to admit their mistake (who knows?).
2. It is clear that for intense applications, 2 GB is not enough, such as VMs... and we all know that the computer will slow down (not explode) when running out of ram. But the ultimate question has not been answered - how bad would it slow down, say when we use VMW fusion on a base model 11.6 MBA???? There was another thread about it. Lots of comments, but no one answered the question... although there was a report on Rev B MBA (XP on fusion) - https://forums.macrumors.com/posts/11318693/
Conclusion:
So it remains unclear: for those that use heavy apps less than a few % of the time, how bad would it slow down with only 2 GB? Someone please post a youtube video showing fusion or parallel on the base model soon.
[EDIT] found the youtube video, here's the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olmTB4Y8ojU