Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You nailed it. They did not have enough content to justify Creator Studio so these are backfill apps. Pixelmator Pro is the bridge app — halfway between belonging with iWork and halfway belonging with Creator Studio.

What feels really weird is that I had to download a whole new Pages app on macOS to get the new icon (gah) and new features but otherwise it is the same app minus my “recently opened documents” list. Why not just make it a standard app update?
Precisely this. This feels like the type of move that Steve used to make fun of other companies for doing. It’s beneath Apple.
 
The iWork apps are basically unusable in any organization. They may look pretty, but the functionally falls apart when you need to send or receive a document from anyone who doesn’t have a Mac. We’ve had to prohibit the use of them at work.
Really? Is it that bad?
 
iWork is good, if you're all Mac, but not useful if you have people who use something else. Plus, Google Workspace is MUCH better, IMO, when doing collaborative stuff.

I kinda miss Aperture, as a higher level photo editor than Photos. Wish it was still around, and had extensions/plugins so I can edit in an app like Pixelmator.

I also miss iBook Author for its interactive book authoring features. Haven't figured out how to do the same thing in Pages yet…
 
I guess some potential options are:

  • Get ready to join the 365 subscription based economy (most recommended by Fortune 500 and all individuals valued above 100M)
  • Use a cloud based AI driven product or web solution (aka data vacuums)
  • Bust out Libre and hope you don't get computer herpes from a macro (probably maybe not going to happen)
 
You nailed it. They did not have enough content to justify Creator Studio so these are backfill apps. Pixelmator Pro is the bridge app — halfway between belonging with iWork and halfway belonging with Creator Studio.

What feels really weird is that I had to download a whole new Pages app on macOS to get the new icon (gah) and new features but otherwise it is the same app minus my “recently opened documents” list. Why not just make it a standard app update?
While I'm not sure if it's the right call or not & time will tell, I can honestly see the logic behind it. Using the AI portions of the iWork apps costs apple money, while the basic features (essentially) don't. By offering the AI stuff, they are offering what some portion of the market demands, while keeping the core functionality free. Making people who cause Apple to incur ongoing costs allows them to keep the apps free for the rest of us.

While I certainly won't be subscribing to the bundle, I'm not upset that they are offering the AI portions of the productivity apps behind a subscription, while keeping the rest free for me to use if I choose.
 
Last edited:
While I almost never use Pages or Numbers, Keynote is the best, far far better than PowerPoint. I use Keynote every day, and thank G I have not turned on automatic upgrade so it didn't get replaced with this total GenZ nonsense app. Once you have this misguided update on your machine, there is no way going back I heard (not sure if true). The last idiotic app decision at Apple that screwed me over was to kill Aperture, I hope Keynote is not next on the chopping block.
 
  • Like
Reactions: parameter
It started with Adobe for most of us: Creative Cloud is rental software, a constant revenue stream, Microsoft 360, etc. So Apple is just late to the game of gaming its customers to provide more monthly revenue. I still have a stand-alone MS Office for the Mac and use Acorn 8 instead of Photoshop. There is also LibreOffice, Open Office and other Mac software without onerous monthly fees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: com.B
I have to wonder if they considered making 2 separate subscription services, one for their office related apps and the other for the creative software. It feels weird to me that these apps are included in "Creator Studio" but I can't forsee an office suite subscription from them doing particular well when the base apps are already plenty.
 
Really? Is it that bad?
The problem doesn’t have as much to do with the functionally of the apps. They do what they do well. The problem is compatibility and collaboration with other users, often external. Microsoft Office is the world standard and people expect these kinds of documents. To make it worse, the iWork apps only run on Mac’s. Yes, they can import and export office format documents, but it’s a coin toss whether or not the integrity of the documents are lost.
 
Personally I love Pages and Numbers. They might not be as fully featured as Word and Excel but I don’t have to pay a subscription to use them (yet… 🙄) and they do everything I need them to.

Plus Pages generally actually positions images without the entire document going crazy and whole paragraphs of text ending up shunted to another page like has been happening with MS Word since the ‘90s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: parameter and mk313
I will keep the current Pages and Numbers and forgo the updates, they work perfectly fine for me. I do also have the paid Office for Mac and Windows for my PC that I got on sale a year ago. Word is easier to use for me than Pages so I typically just use Word.
 
iWork does (and always did) sound a little... cheesy.
The ‘i’ prefix is 90s/00s cheesy, full stop & is the equivalent of calling products ‘ai’ something, nowadays.

They’re never going to change the name of the iPhone or iPad as long as these products have a reason to exist.

iCloud we’re stuck with, as it’ll be too confusing to change it now & ripe for people getting spoofed.

I could see iMovie getting a new name. Or simply cancelled knowing Apple.

And the first ‘I’ product, the iMac, might just slowly disappear…

Or maybe it’ll be reborn as the ‘aiMac’. Let’s hope not.
 
I have used Pages, Keynote and Numbers for a long time, and they have been steadily improved. Microsoft Office is an expensive flagship product, and of course much better (more features), I would also say LibreOffice is better, but it is very clunky and disparate in the user experience, Google Docs is for kindergarten however, it is barely better than WordPad or even TextEdit. I never consider those an MS Office replacement, but they are very good for majority of people and have a proper and unified Apple style and UI.
I’m going to disagree with you about Gsuite 🙂

I worked at a company that was a Google shop with Gsuite being where the company lived.

And it worked totally fine. It’s become surprisingly powerful over the last few years, especially Sheets. And the collaboration features are fantastic.

It’s weird though for those who ‘software’ means a binary app running locally which uses native UI toolkits etc.

But for many ‘young people’, a desktop app means a web app and for them, the only native apps that they use are smartphone and tablet apps.
 
hoping my student discounted Final Cut logic etc package I paid for doesn’t get phased out. No way am I shelling out another $12/mo to Apple for apps that used to be free. Even though the content in the apps is as usual beautiful. I just can’t isubscribe to another thing. I did Apple Arcade for the free trial and used it maybe once. My only hope is to get 3tb of storage at $9.99. Instead of having to upgrade to the next version. I think apples gonna have to rebrand as isubscribe instead of Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lemonice
Steve Jobs thought of the end user experience of the Apple user, his convenience. Timmy thinks of ROI, how to maximize profit. If it doesn't make money, kill it. This will turn Apple into another IBM clone.

iWork was always the free alternative for the Mac user so he doesn't have to buy MS Office when he chooses Apple computer. Now Timmy want to monetize it via subscription.
 
Ah yes… another rebrand, another “it’s not dead, it’s just evolving” moment from Apple. At this point installing a new Apple app feels less like downloading software and more like adopting a goldfish — enjoy it now, because there’s a solid chance it’ll get quietly flushed down the toilet while Craig Federighi smiles on stage telling us it’s the “best experience ever.”

Remember Aperture? Pour one out. That thing didn’t just get canceled — it got Thanos-snapped and replaced with Photos, which spent years trying to remember it was supposed to be a pro tool. iTunes got split into a family of apps like a messy tech divorce, iPhoto vanished, Dashboard went to the great widget farm upstate, and now iWork might be getting the slow fade into “Creator Studio.” Cool name, but also sounds like something designed by a branding committee locked in a room with too much cold brew.

The funniest part is Apple still builds insanely good hardware while their software strategy feels like musical chairs. One year it’s “pro workflows matter,” the next year it’s “here’s a template pack and AI remix button.” I half expect Pages to become “Apple Writing Experience+” with a monthly fee to unlock bold text.

Don’t get me wrong — Pages, Numbers, and Keynote are actually great apps. That’s what makes this cycle so weird. Apple creates something solid, ignores power users for a few years, slaps on a new subscription wrapper, and hopes nobody remembers the last five rebrands.

Anyway, I’m off to export my Keynote files into three backup formats just in case the next keynote announces Keynote is now called “SlideVerse.”

Oh I was seriously bitter with the way Aperture was discarded. At the time (was this around 2007?) the competition was between Apple Aperture and Adobe Lightroom for software management of photos. I decided Aperture was the one I wanted because I trusted Apple to keep developing the software, etc. I forget how many years later that Apple abandoned Aperture and effective forced us into iPhotos (later, Photos). I was bitter because of all the workflow and organization I had done in Aperture, while not totally lost, meant yet another round of re-administering of old photos.

What I can't stand is Apple abandoning a good product and offering either a mediocre and less advanced product, or simply abandoning it totally. It's on reason I never went with iWork. I don't need my documents to be in a format that in later years I can't access because Apple decided to abandon it. By themselves, these kinds of Apple software (iWork, Aperture, etc.) are actually quite good. But the problem is future support and/or development of the software.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.