Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Im curious about this.... BUT

Does lion display windows like this for a single application? I usually have 3-8 documents open in photoshop and switch between them via expose but ONLY display photoshop documents.

It sounds as if that functionality (application expose) is definitely in. Unfortunately it's the grid-based version from Snow Leopard, not the spatial version from Leopard.
 
Hot corners or f10 will not reproduce the function that are available in Snow Leopard. Why remove functionality, i see no reason what soever. It seems that would to turn their desktops into ios's.

Lion at it stands now has very poor window management. This is one area Apple can take some advice from MS

This definitely is a step back. Leopard's "All" and "App" expose modes were PERFECT. It's slowly been getting worse ever since.
 
This debate is like the Rosetta one. Things change. Lion's mission control and the sub controls available via hot corners or pressing F10 in the current app will satisfy most people. There will never be a OS that pleases everyone.

this could be easily solved if apple gave its consumers CHOICE. something theyve never been comfortable with.

how difficult is it to give us the option to revert back to old expose, or keep expose as an extended method of display windows?
 
So the Safari windows are shown "spread out" and individually clickable?

What if you have 2 finder windows open, 2 safari windows open. Make the windows really small. Can you ever invoke Mission Control and have all 4 windows individually selectable? No app grouping.

Basically at what point does Mission Control start grouping things into app bundles?

Yes, in mission control with one app open(Safari) and it has multiple windows open you can choose a Safari window. The finder is shown as well, but you can't close that only relaunch it. If there are multiple finder windows, you can also choose one.
If the Safari windows are minimized, only the active ones are able to be selected in mission control.
I don't know what Apple's thoughts are but I don't have a problem with the process. Your choice is simple, buy or not buy.
 
I can have 15 windows open at any one time and have 8 minimised, there is simply no way to show them all on screen at once. like in SL. SUper Huge step backwards.

MISSION FAILED!!!!
 
So the Safari windows are shown "spread out" and individually clickable?

What if you have 2 finder windows open, 2 safari windows open. Make the windows really small. Can you ever invoke Mission Control and have all 4 windows individually selectable? No app grouping.

Basically at what point does Mission Control start grouping things into app bundles?

It always groups windows from the same app together. You can hover over a window and press space to quick view it and you can also separate the windows out a bit with a gesture (thanks to cherfizzle for pointing that out above): On the magic mouse its a swipe upwards.

I actually prefer the new way as it keeps things easier to find: With the old all windows expose it could be difficult to find anything if you had a lot of small windows. With the new one, you can quickly identify the app you are interested in and then zero in on the specific window you want

Edit:
I've just dug out an old mighty mouse, and you can also spread the windows out by hovering over them and scrolling up, so it doesn't seem like you have to have a multi-touch device to get all the functionality
 
Last edited:
this could be easily solved if apple gave its consumers CHOICE. something theyve never been comfortable with.

how difficult is it to give us the option to revert back to old expose, or keep expose as an extended method of display windows?

Progress is about moving forward. I think it gets to a point where you can't move forward and always give people choices to stay in the past. Just my opinion since I don't think Mission control or that lack of an old style Exposé will hinder my daily workflow.
 
Yes, in mission control with one app open(Safari) and it has multiple windows open you can choose a Safari window. The finder is shown as well, but you can't close that only relaunch it. If there are multiple finder windows, you can also choose one.
If the Safari windows are minimized, only the active ones are able to be selected in mission control.
I don't know what Apple's thoughts are but I don't have a problem with the process. Your choice is simple, buy or not buy.

I don't get people who have the "Apple can do whatever they want to do with their software, users don't have to buy it" mentality. Not just with Apple, but for any company. I love reviewing things, complaining about things, etc. Seems strange when people don't have a preference, are just ok with whatever is given to them. Not an insult, I just don't get it.

Anyway, can anyone confirm what I'm asking about "at what point does it start grouping windows into app bundles?"

For example, can I have 3 apps, containing 8 total windows, and it will still show all windows spread out?

But then when I add a 9th window it will start grouping things into app bundles?

Could someone post a screenshot of Mission Control **without** app grouping?
 
With no way of displaying all windows including minimised windows for me this is huge step backwards just like when they removed the list view from folder in the dock in Leopard. Due to so many complaints that had to re-add the feature. Why on earth remove features.
 
I don't get people who have the "Apple can do whatever they want to do with their software, users don't have to buy it" mentality. Not just with Apple, but for any company. I love reviewing things, complaining about things, etc. Seems strange when people don't have a preference, are just ok with whatever is given to them. Not an insult, I just don't get it.

Anyway, can anyone confirm what I'm asking about "at what point does it start grouping windows into app bundles?"

For example, can I have 3 apps, containing 8 total windows, and it will still show all windows spread out?

But then when I add a 9th window it will start grouping things into app bundles?

Could someone post a screenshot of Mission Control **without** app grouping?

As I said above, Mission control always groups windows from the same app that are on the same screen / desktop together in the "all windows" view. All App windows is a separate view and shows all the windows from a specific app spread out
 
It sounds as if that functionality (application expose) is definitely in. Unfortunately it's the grid-based version from Snow Leopard, not the spatial version from Leopard.

Thats really stupid. If im working with 5+ documents, i dont want to see thumbnails, i want to know which document to go to.
 
Progress is about moving forward. I think it gets to a point where you can't move forward and always give people choices to stay in the past. Just my opinion since I don't think Mission control or that lack of an old style Exposé will hinder my daily workflow.

Progress is also not fixing things that aren't broken. You can see already the amount of dissatisfaction for mission control. This will only increase once lion goes public. Apple pulled a similar stunt with list view folders when put into the dock. They eventually brought it back.
 
As I said above, Mission control always groups windows from the same app together in the "all windows" view. All App windows is a separate view and shows all the windows from a specific app spread out

Ok, mrapplegate seemed to be saying something different. It's the overlapping part that I find so weird. Wish it would separate the windows out, when there's room.
 
Thats really stupid. If im working with 5+ documents, i dont want to see thumbnails, i want to know which document to go to.

The advantage of Mission control grouping windows together into apps is that the windows tend to be bigger (as there isn't as many to fit onto the "grid"). You can easily spread the windows from an app out to see them all clearly and quick view one or open it.
Mission control is definitely different to expose and some things (such as no minimized windows showing in all window view, which may just be a bug) are slightly annoying but I personally think it's a big improvement over expose in SL
 
The advantage of Mission control grouping windows together into apps is that the windows tend to be bigger (as there isn't as many to fit onto the "grid"). You can easily spread the windows from an app out to see them all clearly and quick view one or open it.
Mission control is definitely different to expose and some things (such as no minimized windows showing in all window view, which may just be a bug) are slightly annoying but I personally think it's a big improvement over expose in SL

Like i said earlier, mission control needs more OPTIONS. I want and pretty much NEED expose to run just like it does in Snow Leopard. Its the best way for me to be productive. Mission Control is going to be extremely counter productive.
 
Ok, mrapplegate seemed to be saying something different. It's the overlapping part that I find so weird. Wish it would separate the windows out, when there's room.

I think you're getting confused between All Windows view (i.e. Mission control, the replacement for all windows expose) and All app windows view.

The first is the desktop overview that groups app windows together. They are overlapped but you can spread them out with the mouse (scroll wheel / ball or swipe up) or touchpad and you can also quickview them

The second shows all windows from a specific application and shows minimized windows as thumbnails below all non-minimized windows. This view never overlaps windows
 
Progress is also not fixing things that aren't broken.
Debatable as well :D

Progress is also not fixing things that aren't broken. You can see already the amount of dissatisfaction for mission control. This will only increase once lion goes public. Apple pulled a similar stunt with list view folders when put into the dock. They eventually brought it back.

I feel for all those that are annoyed at Apple and only time will tell if it gets changed. It is all about percentages. How many people are truly inconvenienced by the change?.
 
The second shows all windows from a specific application and shows minimized windows as thumbnails below all non-minimized windows. This view never overlaps windows

How is this enabled ? for the life of me i can't get this happening.
 
The second shows all windows from a specific application and shows minimized windows as thumbnails below all non-minimized windows. This view never overlaps windows

Yeah, exactly. This is good familiar behavior, a holdover from Snow Leopard.

I think the main complaint in this topic is that this view now only exists for a single application at a time. No way to do it for all open windows.
 
This makes it even worse if you minimise windows into application icon there is simply no way to display them. So one has no idea what windows they have. Apple have completely screwed up here.

One can hope the functionality is restored in the final release of Lion.
 
This makes it even worse if you minimise windows into application icon there is simply no way to display them. So one has no idea what windows they have. Apple have completely screwed up here.

One can hope the functionality is restored in the final release of Lion.

This one seems more like a bug to me. It'll probably make it in to the final version.
 
Doing this does not display all windows including minimised.
It does - have a look at the attached screenshot. The five windows at the bottom are minimized ones and the three larger ones are non-minimized
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2011-06-09 at 20.24.40.png
    Screen Shot 2011-06-09 at 20.24.40.png
    685.1 KB · Views: 115
It can be done I have DP4 right now. You go to settings and change mission control to app exposé and it looks the same as in SL. The mission control is obviously replaced until you switch it back.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.