Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I need more people to buy and return to apple. This way, apple can have inventory in their refurb store as I mostly do my apple hardware purchases through their refurb. I can't wait for the 14/16" models to get there.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: psxp
What does moral objectivism have to do with it? Selfish people cause trouble for everyone else, and are generally unlikable, so we do what we can to discourage it.
im so discouraged.

you really believe people reading this thread will change their behavior because some random internet keyboard jockey thinks its selfish to buy multiple mbps to test? please.

here are more rocks to throw around in your glass house.
 
betcha the MAJORITY of those YouTube unboxing videos, are products that are returned. I have no issue buying a Apple Official Refurb. Infact, I've done it for several iMacs, MacBooks, iPods etc over the years, I imagine most of these are pretty much products that have been "Unboxed"
 
you really believe people reading this thread will change their behavior because some random internet keyboard jockey thinks its selfish to buy multiple mbps to test? please.
Whether it will or not doesn't alter the truth of what I said. Of course, the susceptibility of people to truth is highly variable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
Apple deserves all the returns it gets.

I live in HK where Apple FORBIDS returns of any kind. So yea good luck getting a new iPhone in the new colors. You can't return it if you don't like it and if you wait for it to be in the store the order delay is already 2-3 months. Same with the iPad Mini et al.

Gift cards are happily sold by Apple when you trade in your device but NOT ACCEPTED for use to buy a new iPhone or iPad.

Apple HK is run by a bunch of hateful morons. Have a lot of people in town who are going the Samsung route these days are they're just fed up how Apple mistreats locals.


its probably because in that Market there was a problem of people returning devices with fake components in them...
that screwed it up for everyone else..

It was a problem in the Chinese Market a few years back..

 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
Firstly the idea that if we took away the returns policy somehow the prices of anything would go down is ridiculous and wrong. That would never happen all it would mean is Apple would increase its profits end of that story.
I do think some people are ridiculous that go through 5+ phones to find a perfect screen and stuff like that but I don’t see a problem with it if you have a genuine issue it takes that ******** dealing with some shop person that couldn’t care if you got what you wanted which is why I paid 10 times the cost of a cheap phone to get an iPhone so yeah I want the policy and I want it left in place .
 
A perfect recipe for social disintegration, for many kinds of crime or maltreatment of others that you think benefits you. Thanks for being so clear about an attitude that underlies a number of the comments here.
The fate of us as a species is the sum of more than just my decision to return a Mac within the 14 day window. Or, given I've never actually returned a product to Apple, perhaps you're suggesting that's why society hasn't collapsed?
 
Is it immoral to abuse?

It's a guilt thread. There are all sorts of weird threads like this. And why does this persist in this forum?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Denzo
I think the moral issue here is a false choice. Your decision to contribute (or not) to the avalanche of consumerism that negatively impacts the planet (and arguably our culture) is so inconsequential that it’s not worth your mental struggle. You can’t stop climate change alone and try as we might we will never make a difference as individuals.

Go ahead, drive a monster truck to work, throw your plastic in the ocean, and leave your lights on 24/7. None of your individual positive or negative impact will stop the nose dive we’re already in. I’ve heard it said numerous times that the idea that ‘we can make a difference with small, individual lifestyle changes’ is actually an idea peddled by fossel fuels companies, although I have no sources to back it up except all those TV ads by BP, shell, etc.

Point is, in order to stop planetary disaster we need to make national and international changes—government level changes. As long as it makes more economic sense to harm the planet, companies and individuals in mass will continue to choose what’s worse for the planet. We need governments to put their hands on the balances to change the course we are on. Kurzgesagt recently made a great video discussing this idea (they cite their sources).

As for causing longer shipping times, other people who were late to the ordering process will wait all the same—you didn’t force them to order when they did and they could’ve been more proactive if they didn’t want to wait.

So is it morally wrong to use a return policy generously? If it helps you make a decision you’re happy with, then absolutely not. If you have no intention to buy anything in the first place, then yeah I’d say that’s a pretty lame thing to do… but I don’t think you fall in that camp.

TL;DR: No
 
  • Angry
Reactions: arobert3434
The fate of us as a species is the sum of more than just my decision to return a Mac within the 14 day window. Or, given I've never actually returned a product to Apple, perhaps you're suggesting that's why society hasn't collapsed?
Ha, that was random! I think I've made my point clear enough, for anyone who wants to see it.

It's a guilt thread. There are all sorts of weird threads like this. And why does this persist in this forum?
Because people behave in ways that affect the rest of us, of course.
 
I think the moral issue here is a false choice. Your decision to contribute (or not) to the avalanche of consumerism that negatively impacts the planet (and arguably our culture) is so inconsequential that it’s not worth your mental struggle. You can’t stop climate change alone and try as we might we will never make a difference as individuals.

Go ahead, drive a monster truck to work, throw your plastic in the ocean, and leave your lights on 24/7. None of your individual positive or negative impact will stop the nose dive we’re already in. I’ve heard it said numerous times that the idea that ‘we can make a difference with small, individual lifestyle changes’ is actually an idea peddled by fossel fuels companies, although I have no sources to back it up except all those TV ads by BP, shell, etc.

Point is, in order to stop planetary disaster we need to make national and international changes—government level changes. As long as it makes more economic sense to harm the planet, companies and individuals in mass will continue to choose what’s worse for the planet. We need governments to put their hands on the balances to change the course we are on. Kurzgesagt recently made a great video discussing this idea (they cite their sources).

As for causing longer shipping times, other people who were late to the ordering process will wait all the same—you didn’t force them to order when they did and they could’ve been more proactive if they didn’t want to wait.

So is it morally wrong to use a return policy generously? If it helps you make a decision you’re happy with, then absolutely not. If you have no intention to buy anything in the first place, then yeah I’d say that’s a pretty lame thing to do… but I don’t think you fall in that camp.

TL;DR: No
Same kind of argument used against other kinds of personal responsibility, and in favor of a wide variety of crime and other behavior that harms others. If everything thinks as you do, society falls apart, quickly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
Morality is so subjective that I don’t know that anyone could really define if this is or isn’t. It’s not something I would personally do intentionally (ordering two and returning the one I didn’t like, that is) but I would say one could argue if the policy doesn’t specifically outline this scenario or describe what intents are valid or not to use it, its within the realm of rules established. At that point it’s just a person utilizing a service offered at the end of the day. Sure the intent probably isn’t to do it this way, but if apple themselves aren’t policing it or saying not to… why not? Again, not something I would do so maybe it’s personally against my morals? I don’t know. But morality is so subjective we could even argue the morality of capitalism in general. Nothing we partake in is necessarily 100% moral.
 
Morality is so subjective that I don’t know that anyone could really define if this is or isn’t. It’s not something I would personally do intentionally (ordering two and returning the one I didn’t like, that is) but I would say one could argue if the policy doesn’t specifically outline this scenario or describe what intents are valid or not to use it, its within the realm of rules established. At that point it’s just a person utilizing a service offered at the end of the day. Sure the intent probably isn’t to do it this way, but if apple themselves aren’t policing it or saying not to… why not? Again, not something I would do so maybe it’s personally against my morals? I don’t know. But morality is so subjective we could even argue the morality of capitalism in general. Nothing we partake in is necessarily 100% moral.
q the morality thought police who'll tell you that your kind is the reason society is falling apart

where's my popcorn
 
q the morality thought police telling you that your kind is the reason society is falling apart

where's my popcorn
Haven't seen anyone say that, but the defense mechanisms here that keep people from seeing what actually is said are entertaining!
 
As long as you are not profiting financially off returns (e.g., YouTubers who buy items and return them after reviewing them), I don't see any issue with returning an item that you are not happy with. Spending thousands of dollars on a computer is a serious investment, and Apple has a refurbishment program that will still allow them to make generous profits off even the refurbished items. Apple is not a startup company, and they have really high profit margins.
 
I know that Apple have a very generous no questions asked returns policy. But I would imagine that there is a significant cost to this for Apple ( which is obviouly then passed onto us, as customers ). After all, they can’t just put stuff back on the shelf like a book from a book store. There‘s an economic cost, and there’s an environmental cost, but there’s also a moral cost in that it seems many people are gaming this generous policy by buying machines they know they don’t need, in order to ‘test’ stuff out. This means people keenly waiting for a machine have to wait longer.
What do other people on here think of this? For me it seems in poor taste; the policy is there for people who genuinely find that the machine they bought just doesn’t suit their needs. And yet some folk on here almost talk about buying two and returning one with glee. Is it the worst of human nature, the unacceptable face of consumerism set against the pleas of restraint at COP 26? Or am I just getting old and fusty?

As background, I’m looking to buy one of the new laptops and so I’ve been researching my purchase to see what I need, don’t need, may want etc. I’ve measured out screen sizes on my desktop to compare,and been into the local computer stores to see various current apple models. I’ve read various reviews and spent probably too much time watching various YouTubers of no proven expertise all trotting out identikit rundowns. I feel like I've done my research now and I’d be pretty certain that when I make my purchase I’m making it seriously.

So, what do others think?

Like credit card processing fees, free shipping and warranty repairs, returns are a cost of doing business and are built into the price you pay. If you genuinely think you will like something and end up unhappy with your purchase send it back without regret.

And f all those COP 26 **sswipes that brought their entourages, motorcades and jets to their annual do as I say not as I do event.
 
It's a guilt thread. There are all sorts of weird threads like this. And why does this persist in this forum?
No more weird than people obsessing about whether a computer scores 7035 or 7038 on some geeky test?.
 

JonDigital


If you want a perfect Macbook, you have to order several. Many have scratches and marks out of the box. And of course the pixel failure and dust problem. I had one Macbook Pro 14" with pink sub pixel failure on white and dust behind the glass (grey spot).
Isn’t life more fun with its imperfections?
 
I don’t see any issue with this. Apple doesn’t offer the general public a way to see new devices before preorders go live, so I usually will buy the product I want in multiple colors/finishes, go to the store on launch day, see the display models, decide which one I want, and then pick up just that one. It’s not like the products need to be re-packaged or shipped anywhere.
But you can see the colours on the web, and for RAM and storage you can figure out what you want before ordering…. so all you’re doing is stopping someone else getting a machine as soon as you. Or rather stopping several people getting a machine as soon as you ?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.