At 12-18 inches your eye cannot discern pixels above 300ppi. This is scientific fact you can look up. That is why magazine print is 300dpi.
Sure if you hold it to your nose you'll see pixels, which then you're just trying to convince yourself the PPI is bad as there is no reasonable use situation to do that (plus it can damage your eyes).
There is no possible way you can tell 75 pixels per inch are missing from the Plus 401ppi at any reasonable viewing distance.
Dots per inch is the same things as pixels per inch just paper vs LCD300 dpi in print is a bit different from 300 ppi if I’m not mistaken. Anyway, for most kind of things that show on screen that’s true, not much of a difference. Not so for text, the difference is noticeable enough there if you know what to look for. Especially if you are coming from an X or another good OLED. You won’t see pixels, but you’ll see some slight jaggedness or artifacts at certain spots in it.
It doesn’t make the display crap or thrash by any means, but it can be noticed at normal viewing distances, for certain things.
Dots per inch is the same things as pixels per inch just paper vs LCD
Are people even reading my original post? I never had the 6/7/8.
I had the 6s Plus...which looks better than the 8.
Try a side by side Google Search on the 8 and 8 Plus in Safari...if you can’t see the blurred text on the 8 you must be blind.
I understand the OLED iPhones are going to look better, but I’m saying the Plus Sized phones also look better (than the 6/7/8 and supposedly XR with the 326ppi display).
Just wondering if it’s a downgrade in screen resolution going from a Plus sized iPhone (401ppi) compared to the XR (326ppi).
I agree with you. I had an 8 plus went to the 6 and now the max and there’s no difference.I am literally holding my 6S (not 6S Plus) beside my X now, and fonts look EXACTLY the same, which means THERE IS NO visible difference in pixel density when they are viewed from usual viewing distance.
Colors look different, contrast look different. But text and graphics sharpness is the same. There is no any jagging, which would be indication of poor pixel density.
People just fall for the marketing schemes.science says the eyes can't tell the difference above 300ppi but somehow you feel a screen is crap.
i think it's just your eyes playing tricks on you.
Science doesn’t say that. Science says for average vision at a beyond about 12 inches, most people cannot discern individual pixels at 326 ppi.science says the eyes can't tell the difference above 300ppi but somehow you feel a screen is crap.
i think it's just your eyes playing tricks on you.
Your nephew's 8 Plus has a pixel density of 401 ppi. That's arguably higher than even the XS Max. The XS Max has a pixel density of 458 ppi, but OLED pixels only have 2 subpixels, whereas LCD pixels are comprised of 3 subpixels.It's going to look great, I personally was very impressed with the display on my nephews 8+.
Thank you for the thoughtful response! I currently have the XS Max (it’s awesome) but I’m probably going to downgrade to a 7 Plus or 8 Plus due to how the Max uses PWM on their OLED screens. Getting headaches and eye fatigue and I never had it with my older LCD iPhones.Science doesn’t say that. Science says for average vision at a beyond about 12 inches, most people cannot discern individual pixels at 326 ppi.
However, if you have better than average eyesight or else well-corrected eyesight with glasses, it's fairly common to be able to tell the quality difference between a 326 ppi 6s and a 401 ppi 6s Plus.
For example it's fairly easy for me to tell the difference in quality between an 8 and 8 Plus at a viewing distance of 11-12".
While I don't necessarily resolve individual pixels, I can see softness of the text on the 8 (and my wife's 6s) due to subpixel antialiasing. That softness is not there on my 7 Plus, the 8 Plus I've checked out, or the XS Max either. Both the Plus and the Max small fonts look crisper in comparison.
A 326 ppi screen is not the end of the world, but once you see the quality difference, you can't unsee it, and it can be annoying to some people.
Your nephew's 8 Plus has a pixel density of 401 ppi. That's arguably higher than even the XS Max. The XS Max has a pixel density of 458 ppi, but OLED pixels only have 2 subpixels, whereas LCD pixels are comprised of 3 subpixels.
BTW, the guy who runs DisplayMate (the site does the yearly phone screen comparisons) says a person with perfect vision can resolve up to 477 ppi at 12 inches. That seems way too high to me though for general usage, since I'm guessing anything beyond about 375 ppi in LCD terms is probably great for the vast majority of the population.
EDIT:
Here we go:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/b...resolving-the-iphone-resolution/#.W7QJCacZNR4
Let me make this clear: if you have perfect eyesight, then at one foot away the iPhone 4’s pixels are resolved. The picture will look pixellated. If you have average eyesight, the picture will look just fine.
So in a sense, both Jobs and Soneira are correct. At the very worst, you could claim Jobs exaggerated; his claim is not true if you have perfect vision. But for a lot of people, I would even say most people, you’ll never tell the difference. And if you hold the phone a few inches farther away it’ll look better.
So in my opinion, what Jobs said was fine. Soneira, while technically correct, was being picky. So I mildly disagree with him about that.
Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean nobody can see it.There’s very very little difference in text sharpness at normal viewing differences. Well, I’d say none, but there probably is a slight difference.
I think the “326ppi is not as crisp” crowd may be perceiving the difference in contrast as a difference in text clarity.
Indeed.I wish it had a higher PPI, 400 would do, but what i'm hoping for is a display that supersedes all prior Apple LCDs - this is a flagship LCD display made my Japan Display so I have hopes that there is something to it that blows other Apple LCDs (traditionally excellent) out of the water.
Unfortunately we already know the brightness level, the PPI, that its probably going to have a warm 6500K white point which Apple has been honing in on closer to every year, and soft/accurate P3 gamut - in other words in reality I don't think there is anywhere for us to be pleasantly surprised here.
I previously had an iPhone 6S Plus and upgraded to the XS Max and I love it.
My wife has an 8 Plus and is considering the XR.
I went to the Apple store recently to look at the 7 and 8 and to compare the 326ppi, shortly after I realized the text on those phones look really bad. It doesn’t look sharp or crisp like the Plus sized iPhones and the X/XS Max.
Is the text on the XR going to look crisp and have there been improvements compared to the 8? Or is it going to look like a bigger version of the 8?
If it’s the latter, it’s going to suck for XR users who are coming from a Plus sized iPhone or the X.
science says the eyes can't tell the difference above 300ppi but somehow you feel a screen is crap.
i think it's just your eyes playing tricks on you.
I’m honestly not trying to troll
I can personally tell the difference between the 8 and 8 Plus...which has me worried about the XR.
Well, I just pulled the trigger on the 7 Plus Jet Black 128gb (Refurbished) for $569 on Apple's website. This has absolutely nothing to do with money, but the PWM on the Max is driving my eyes (and head) crazy.OK, but the thread title sounds like a classic bit of troll bait. Garbage? Of course it won't look like garbage. A "non-troll" thread title would've been something like "Is the XR display going to be noticeably inferior compared to the 6/7/8 Plus models?"
I believe everyone that claims they can distinguish between 326 and 401 ppi (let alone XS/XS Max resolution). If I'm looking closely enough, I can too. That said, 326 is sufficient for me. It's what I'm used to, and I don't feel like I'm missing out on anything at this pixel density.
I'm reserving judgment on the XR's display until I actually see it for myself. I mean, for all I know, the XR will indeed look like garbage - but no one can make that assertion based strictly on ppi. That's silly.