Amen to that! All I want is for iTunes to show what I'm listening to on Facebook. Not sure why, but I want it.
They are talking about Cupertino time....
Apple released a press announcement last month saying they were delaying it until November.
It's 13:50 Thursday and it's still not here.
Works fine on ATV, but i haven't tried it on iPhone or iPad. It all comes down to network speeds and device processing power. I imagine library that big will take some to cache on the device.
No, if it was a matter of network speed and processing power, iPad and iPhone would easily outperform the ATV. I agree it probably has to do with caching, but then this caching is done wrong - interestingly, the Remote app on the iDevices works fast and flawlessly, and I don't see why home sharing cannot work the same way. As I said, they obviously got it right for the ATV.
For the purposes of it being a simple mp3 player and nothing more, this is unacceptable. If all developers were that lazy, we'd require a lot more than 8gb of RAM just to run software.
An mp3 player holding over 120gb of music and gb of album art using up only 200mb of RAM is the definition of optimization.
I have Sparrow idling using up 120mb of RAM, and Preview open with two 3mb pictures, using up 281mb of RAM somehow.
How a few hundred of a robust media app can be considered bloated is beyond me.
Some people seem to be under the assumption these delays would have never happened under Steve.
Instead the software was delayed with a new release date pegged at the end of November, and The Wall Street Journal believes it will come out as soon as tomorrow.
It's 13:50 Thursday and it's still not here.
Maybe Fiji is not their reference????? Greetings at 9.30 from Germany (meaning on Hawaii its still wednesday)
It's not going to be, Apple's gonna blow past their second self-imposed deadline
Maybe Fiji is not their reference????? Greetings at 9.30 from Germany (meaning on Hawaii its still
wednesday)
People are reading way too much into the wording of "As Soon As Thursday"
Australia.
No we're not. It's a retarded thing to say about something that's been delayed a month, hasn't come out yet and has only two more days left before they have to change the graphic to "Coming in December."
In hindsight, Apple should have released it as a public BETA when they announced in September.
Sadly, far too many people have the assumption that none of things they have not liked from Apple over the past year would have happened with Steve around. In all reality, I am guessing nothing much is different with the company than he had planned this past year. It's a cheap excuse.
You can sync playlist across devices with iTunes Match. Works great for me.
Some people seem to be under the assumption these delays would have never happened under Steve.
These people seem to have a very lousy memory.
Do you forget the first version of OS X, and OS X Leopard?
Releasing unfinished software is never a sensible idea; and I'd think this is empathised even more so by the maps debacle.
Sometimes deadlines aren't met, and as frustrating as that is it doesn't mean you should neglect the experience of the product.
Customers were frustrated with the delay of Leopard but I remember the level of excitement when it was released due to the pleasurable experience.
I'd rather wait and be blown away than impatient and experience a buggy piece of crap. As the saying goes "you can't rush art"
Lets hope our patience pays off tomorrow.