Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Re: Walk carefully

Originally posted by AllenPSU
Apple is treading on thin ice. If they are successful they can open up a whole new market but they must be a little worried that the instability of Windows may bite them. I really hope they get someone real good.
i wouldn't get to worried, it will probably be windows xp only, and xp is very stable from what ive used, probably as good as os x for me.

iJon
 
Could this be a way for Apple to make a smooth transition or to see if people like the software enough to where they in the future go like: " well, if you like iTunes, the iPod, iDisk, and whatever they decide to make for Winblows, then here is OS X for the x86 or the Opteron(Itanium). (remember marklar)

Maybe they are testing the waters or making Apple more mainstream and making it so attractive that people may just make the switch, thus getting the developers onboard to make software for x86OS x.

I think I may be looking to far into this!

Go 970, Go PPC.😕
 
Originally posted by Mr Jobs
jamilecrire its 3.30am here in the UK and you just gave me a good laugh, thanks man

If you want to know the funny thing about my posting is my first job out of college was at Arthur Andersen and so far it was the best job I've had (worst freaking pay ever). The people were very intelligent, the job was interesting and the clients were very nice (usually).

I felt bad for them because I worked in Business Consulting (Computer Related), CRM (Computer Risk Management) and did Audits with the accountants. I have a degree in Finance and MIS and I speak 3 languages (English, Spanish, French). I'm considering getting a Masters in Economics (or just another undergrad in Econ) for fun. That will have to wait another couple of years though.

The funny thing is I love programming, I just hate working on programs. I'm a tinkerer, I like learning how to do things, the mundane task of building boring applications is only worthwhile because it allows me to blow insane amounts of cash on the toys my wife wants (I'm guilty as well). Plus I'll be retired by the time I'm 35. Well not retired but no longer in need of cash to maintain a very comfortable standard of living. I guess when I thought the stock market was overpriced in 1997 I was right (as far as I know only Warren E Buffett and myself thought this, j/k).

Oh well back to work (100-120hrs/week). My only breaks are college football in the fall and world cup soccer (qualifying too) which is the reason I'll be speaking 4 languages before too long (Germany 2006).

Sorry for rant, this is my form of bar (a la Cheers).
 
Re: Re: Re: hoax?

Originally posted by mim
This indeed is the problem. Imagine the poor guy who pipes up and says "hang on, my BEST friend would be perfect for the job". There's a basement workstation beside the trash compactor that's got that guy's name on it...😀

now that is hella funny. Reminds me of "Office Space." 😀
 
Re: iTunes for Windows is Coming

Originally posted by Macrumors
Must be possess strong skills in the areas of application design, solid API design principles, user interface engineering, and have a strong understanding of customer and workflow issues.

Apparently you don't have to possess proper gramatical skills or other proper uses of the english language. That being the case, can I have a job in the marketing department now?
I kan spel reel gud.

Job listing re-written: Must be possessin' mad skillz in killer app speech, great taggin', the shizzle dizzle for the enginizzle, and hear the good shout-outs from the peeps.

I'm in the book. Online Apple resume already filled out. 🙂

And one more thing - who would want to work in the WINDOWS department at Apple? Talk about the guy (or girl - don't want to annoy the ladies...) who will be the recipient of every practical joke the Infinite Loop campus can throw at them. Poor bastage.
 
Re: Re: iTunes for Windows is Coming

Originally posted by Mudbug
Apparently you don't have to possess proper gramatical skills or other proper uses of the english language. That being the case, can I have a job in the marketing department now?
I kan spel reel gud.

Job listing re-written: Must be possessin' mad skillz in killer app speech, great taggin', the shizzle dizzle for the enginizzle, and hear the good shout-outs from the peeps.

I'm in the book. Online Apple resume already filled out. 🙂

And one more thing - who would want to work in the WINDOWS department at Apple? Talk about the guy (or girl - don't want to annoy the ladies...) who will be the recipient of every practical joke the Infinite Loop campus can throw at them. Poor bastage.

Basically you'd be the butt of every joke... The office pariah. Steve's litte bit@h.
 
As a windows, solaris, linux and mac os 9/X user, my belief is this would kill Macs.

If I want an OS for work, games, etc that is cheap and works well enough I choose windows (as most people do). If I want a total experience, ease of use, amazing hardware, style I choose OS X. If I want a stable server platform for web applications I choose Linux. If I want a scaleable, stable, supported OS for a database server I choose solaris (sparc).

Apple can take over all these with the exception of cheap. This is why putting apple s/w on PC hardware (it almost is now) won't work. No style, No Apple.

Maybe apple should pull a Nintendo and start dumping their hardware to get market share. Once everything is available for OS X or OS XI, ... then start to focus on greater margins.

I think apple can become the DB Server (with PPC 970 and Oracle), the Web Server (Apache w/JSP mod), and the stylish desktop. The desktop is more difficult because consumers are VERY price sensitive. Not to mention very easily swayed by misinformation from the "Ad Wizards" in the Wintel marketing departments.

Originally posted by MacAficionado
Could this be a way for Apple to make a smooth transition or to see if people like the software enough to where they in the future go like: " well, if you like iTunes, the iPod, iDisk, and whatever they decide to make for Winblows, then here is OS X for the x86 or the Opteron(Itanium). (remember marklar)

Maybe they are testing the waters or making Apple more mainstream and making it so attractive that people may just make the switch, thus getting the developers onboard to make software for x86OS x.

I think I may be looking to far into this!

Go 970, Go PPC.😕
 
Discredits Marklar?

IF the marklar rumor is correct...wouldnt they already have a version of iTunes for x86?

And even if they only made the OS on x86, wouldnt they get the same team to do iTunes?
 
Re: Discredits Marklar?

Originally posted by Xerov
IF the marklar rumor is correct...wouldnt they already have a version of iTunes for x86?

And even if they only made the OS on x86, wouldnt they get the same team to do iTunes?

Good question, but probably not. iTunes isn't an essential part of the OS, so getting it to run on x86 probably hasn't been first priority, until uncle Steve said "make it so."
And as for part 2 of your question, the folks that write the code for OSX on x86 are STILL probably a little busy working on that one. If that is the ultimate plan (not saying it is, mind you...) then taking away your most important programmers from thier chiseled out task at hand seems like a bad idea.

I think what they should do is javacise the program, or make it run as a "dos" level program that would allow it to run without the windows interface running, and allow the port to multiple os's without serious recoding.

my .02¢
 
Re: Help Wanted?!!

Originally posted by Fredo Viola
Is it just me, or is it really weird to see a job listing for such a seriously important role at Apple? You'd think Steve had a handful of the most talented in mind. At the same time it's pretty cool to see that it's not closed, that they're looking to see what's out there, see what's fresh and innovative. That's what keeps Apple the great company that it is! They always seek to innovate. And make money, of course, but that's the nature of the beast!
I doubt it's as glamorous a position as you make it out to be. "Senior Software Engineer" is a fairly broad category that usually translates to, "Programmer with experience". My title at my present and prior jobs is/was "Senior Software Engineer", before that it was the equivilent of "Software Engineer" (technically, it was "Cosultant II" - but that meant nothing to anyone but payroll). Both titles mean code-geek, one pays a lot better than the other. I am one of about 100 "Software Engineers" at my division of [censored] (insert large, DFW based travel it shop here) [/censored] and of those 100, I'd guess there's about 20 of us that are "Senior". I'd venture to guess that Apple has a lot more than 20 Sr. Eng'rs. (It's not like this position would be the only guy working on the app' - at least I doubt it.)

[edit]PS: When I say that "senior" just means experienced, I really should say that we are expected (because of that experience) to be more of a systems architect/designer type engineer than the less experienced guys/gals. (Just didn't want to disrespect any fellow "Senior" engineers out there! 😉 )

PPS: I know a lot of "non-senior" engineers that could design and/or code circles around some "senior" ones. Sometimes seniority get's confused with "senior". 🙄

[second edit was to censor my company and division names - nobody here would care and my company (and it's parent) would probably not appretiate me talking about how many engineers we have 😀 ]
 
Re: Discredits Marklar?

Originally posted by Xerov
IF the marklar rumor is correct...wouldnt they already have a version of iTunes for x86?

And even if they only made the OS on x86, wouldnt they get the same team to do iTunes?

The bigest problem with that theory is that Marklar is not windows. It's Mac OS. So even though it runs on x86, that means nothing to a windows user. That's like saying "Well, I have this copy of photoshop for linux, shouldn't it run on windows?" No. It's a totally different os.
 
iTunes for PC

It was an obvious thing to happen.. All I can say is I told you so (to all those who denied all the possibily of this in my post a week or so ago).


Apple can now branch their music service. This will be great for bringing the whole computer community on board.
 
PC version - the important stuff

The important thing for them to work on is really getting it to work flawlessly on multiple versions of windows. XP screws with it's code differently than 9x, or 2000, or NT, or fill in the blank. In order for it to really work with the windows-using folks, it's got to be perfect. Not just pretty-much there. All of the artists. All of the tracks. All of the options. All of the time. And god/allah/yahweh help them if it crashes. Ever.

Wanna see what real windows users (that would give a flip) think of mac folks and thier software? Go join a chat with some gamers. They'll let you know just what they think. The trick will be winning them over. They are, by the way, probably the largest portion of the P2P sharing market as it existed before yesterday.
 
Re: Discredits Marklar?

Originally posted by Xerov
IF the marklar rumor is correct...wouldnt they already have a version of iTunes for x86?

And even if they only made the OS on x86, wouldnt they get the same team to do iTunes?

no...

iTunes for Marklar would be iTunes for Mac recompiled and tweaked.

Windows has a completely different API and would require a rewrite.

Same reason you can't run BeOS (for x86) apps under Windows and vice versa.

arn
 
I don't know why so many people think iTunes for Window$ spells doom for Apple. Obviously Apple has more OS X specific apps on the way... so what if Window$ folk get one more iApp?
 
here's what the windows world will see soon...

hehe. I just thought this would be funny...

<edit> Please excuse the nastyness and quickness - I'm sitting in the recliner on the laptop ? not looking to expend too much energy this close to going to bed.</edit>
 

Attachments

  • ituneswinxpcrash.jpg
    ituneswinxpcrash.jpg
    70.4 KB · Views: 934
Re: PC version - the important stuff

Originally posted by Mudbug
The important thing for them to work on is really getting it to work flawlessly on multiple versions of windows. XP screws with it's code differently than 9x, or 2000, or NT, or fill in the blank. In order for it to really work with the windows-using folks, it's got to be perfect. Not just pretty-much there. All of the artists. All of the tracks. All of the options. All of the time. And god/allah/yahweh help them if it crashes. Ever.

Wanna see what real windows users (that would give a flip) think of mac folks and thier software? Go join a chat with some gamers. They'll let you know just what they think. The trick will be winning them over. They are, by the way, probably the largest portion of the P2P sharing market as it existed before yesterday.

So true. It will only take a miniscule flaw and the mac haters will be going at it full force.
 
Re: I could get this job.

Originally posted by jamilecrire
* This only applies to democrats, for the republican version see below.

1) Get rich any way possible (ethics be damned).
2) Lie to self that money, power, success actually is happiness
3) Goto #1

4) Save it for the political forums. And remember which way Bill Gates and Ted Turner vote.

PS: Some of us don't like making blanket statements about huge segments of the population, i.e. "those black people sure do like to sleep around."
 
Re: Re: I could get this job.

Originally posted by BaghdadBob
4) Save it for the political forums. And remember which way Bill Gates and Ted Turner vote.

PS: Some of us don't like making blanket statements about huge segments of the population, i.e. "those black people sure do like to sleep around."

well said.
 
Better be soon

The funny thing is, Republicans would say the same thing about Democrats. Just demonstrates how little people understand their opposition, no matter how much they may "try" to.

On-topic:
Apple better get off their butts and get this out by the end of the summer, not the end of the year, or their system will be copied (although probably not well). Like we saw with the iPod, TiBook, etc., it doesn't take long for the PC world to come up with cheap knock-offs of Apple designs, and those were hardware. Rhapsody need only eliminate their subscription service and team up with MS to implement a DRM solution similar to Apple's, and the opportunity is lost.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.