I think it's going ot be one of those things that people will be on the fence about, they'll try it out and then find it very difficult to live without.
Totally agree. For $25? Seems like a no brainer really.
I think it's going ot be one of those things that people will be on the fence about, they'll try it out and then find it very difficult to live without.
I hope they figure this out. While 59,000 songs is far above average, it is not that unusual. I have about 52,000 after getting rid of duplicates. 25,000 seems pretty low for anyone over 35 that bothered to rip their CDs/records. Certainly for anyone interested in this service.
I'm not sure about that. With an digital copy, you still have something that is yours, just like with vinyl. I think people still want to see that they "own" something they pay for.
Also, there is an emotional attachment to music and movies. I think half the reason people buy television season DVDs is to say, "that's my favorite show" as sort of an expression as that DVD sits on their shelf.
And there's also the threat that the media goes away if it's in the "cloud". Am I going to risk losing my copy of my favorite album and trust that to Apple or Amazon? I wouldn't.
finalcut said:this service will only be interesting to match and level up the quality or your tunes. I tried having all my music in one of my WD world edition and streaming from my house wifi and itunes was freaking slow and "skipping" tunes is not something I want
So I can imagine the same over internet. Also, I don't think ppl will do it with their ipod/iphone over 3G costwise. After all, only americans have unlimited plans on their phone
I've spent a lot of time making sure my music library has the exact album art, proper tags and everything else in line, even changing genres for some songs. That being said, I'd hate to sign up for this service and then once all is said and done, the iCloud version of my library isn't as perfectly arranged and categorized as my hard copy of the music library I put together.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; nl-nl) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)
Unlimited data plan in Holland here, you're not alone. And we have coverage too.
Well, if one says there are approx 12 tracks per cd that means you have nearly 4,500 cds, and at, say, 10 bucks per cd, that's around 45,000 dollars you've spent on music. Sound like a lot to me - if every one of those 52,000 tracks is legit, of course. I'm not saying that there aren't people out there with massive (legit) record collections, but you'd have to think that apart from djs or musicians, not many people spend that much money on cds and that if they have upwards of 40,000 tracks a lot of it will be from torrent sites.
Does anyone else think there will be some sort of limit to the laundering of the illegal music? Maybe lets say, after you have created your initial library in the cloud, next year it changes to only allow itunes purchases to be added to your icloud library? I am not sure there would be a way to do this without excluding legally purchased CDs that you rip.
Well the limit is 25,000 songs. So once you laundered that amount you'll have to buy songs on iTunes if you want to use them with iCloud I suppose.
Or did that 25,000 limit only apply to what you can actively store in the cloud that couldn't be matched to songs already available in the itunes library?
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8L1)
The Beatles are an Unknown Artist![]()
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_3 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8J2)
What exactly does this service offer that I can't already do with an app like Audio Tap? I paid $1.99 and I stream everything from my computer to my iPhone over 3G or wifi. I can even create playlists. It works perfectly.
I'm just not getting that this service will do anything I haven't already been doing for ages, that is, avoid ever needing to sync music to my phone and just streaming all 20,000 or so songs from my computer.
Am I missing something here?
Well the limit is 25,000 songs. So once you laundered that amount you'll have to buy songs on iTunes if you want to use them with iCloud I suppose.
Or did that 25,000 limit only apply to what you can actively store in the cloud that couldn't be matched to songs already available in the itunes library?
The 25K applies to all the songs in your iTunes library. It didn't scan to see what was purchased through iTunes and what wasn't. Started iTunes match, over 25k window popped up, and that's it. Need an old-timer/music-hoarder/filthy-pirate plan!
The 25K applies to all the songs in your iTunes library. It didn't scan to see what was purchased through iTunes and what wasn't. Started iTunes match, over 25k window popped up, and that's it. Need an old-timer/music-hoarder/filthy-pirate plan!
Well, if one says there are approx 12 tracks per cd that means you have nearly 4,500 cds, and at, say, 10 bucks per cd, that's around 45,000 dollars you've spent on music. Sound like a lot to me - if every one of those 52,000 tracks is legit, of course. I'm not saying that there aren't people out there with massive (legit) record collections, but you'd have to think that apart from djs or musicians, not many people spend that much money on cds and that if they have upwards of 40,000 tracks a lot of it will be from torrent sites.
3 Three UK ALL IN ONE plan gives you free unlimited use of Spotify premium for the length of your contract which seems much better than this effort from Apple.![]()
Not only that. But a person who would have bought 59,000 songs and then digitalized them all to keep them on his or her computer, would such a person, with that kind of interest in music actually convert them into a format worse than what Apple offers? And would that person then be willing to downgrade his listening experience?
Also, lets say that it would take 1 minute per track to rip and covert it, and that number is way too low, then it would have taken that person 41 days to rip and covert those songs...
----
I'd say, that 99.99%+ of the people with a digital music library beyond 25,000 tracks have downloaded most of it.
So, if I store al my music on an external HDD, and I do the iTunes match,
plug the HDD out, I'll be able to listen to my music without the files on my MBP itself
Nice, that's a space saver(In my case 16GB
)
99.99 ? GEEE , then I'm the 0.01 ?????
I dare you find one downloaded song in my library ????
Go in a music shop, you'll find passionnate people who still BUY Cds or Vynils ...
and well we don't have Mac since yesterday ... iTunes has 10 years .... Yeah it takes time to rip all cds / or Dvds but we don't have ultimatum ...
and with my Mac Pro , ripping one cd take less then one minute PER CD !!!!, so where's the deal ????
and yes sir , we dont always listen to music in our living room, do you know cars, iPod when you listen to music in bed ?
And why would someone who really love music download crappy MP3 ?
AAC is good quality ... Loseless too !!! So where's the problem with wanting all our CDS ripped ????
I always want my tunes encode with the best AAC possible !!!!
So yes once again , over 25'000 is a lot .... people at 20 years old can't reach this ... obviously !!!!
I'm 45 and i feel offended when someone call me a thief when i bought every of my cds or dvds !!!
yeah sorry i dont drink or go out every day ... my money is not spend in vodka or beach vacation or whatever.... So i may have spend 35000 dollars in CDs in my entire life but yeah its my life and if Apple propose me to pay 50 dollars a year to have them on iCloud ... where's your problem ????????
stay with your 25'000 ... no one will force you to get a higher plan !!!
GEEE !!!!
Yeah, this is terrific.
I just wish it was 320kbps playback.
I have a SSD and space is at a premium on there....but its also my audiophile setup and I don't want to downgrade my entire library just to save pricey gigabytes