Oh, that brings back memories! "and now, from Norwich, it's the quiz of the week."
Sale of the Century with Nicholas Parsons.
Oh, that brings back memories! "and now, from Norwich, it's the quiz of the week."
Oh, that brings back memories! "and now, from Norwich, it's the quiz of the week."
... i don't care what irrelevant company is claiming the IP, they only did that because of the iPod in the first place. Sounds like karma is coming back to bite them in the ass.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGkjGAwt4ss&feature=related
Ahh Sunday's. Roast dinner, bath before school the next day, watch the Muppet Show while mum does the washing up before we all settle in front of the telly to watch Sale of the Century. We only had 3 channels but somehow there seemed more programmes worth watching. LOL
ITV is an international company and with the exception of Downton Abbey which won several Golden globes, they churn out crap like the X factor and its ilk which I doubt apple would want to be associated with.
ITV is worth $306bn, I can't see Apple taking it over just for the trademark "iTV".
You could buy controlling interest (51% of the voting stock) in ITV for less than 1% of your inflated "worth", which is less than 2% of Apple's cash position. Then all you would have to do is replace enough board members to fire any executives or lawyers who try to would defend the trademark. Then sell the 51% to an investment firm who promised not to hire them back to recoup a large part of the purchase price. Done.
You could buy controlling interest (51% of the voting stock) in ITV for less than 1% of your inflated "worth", which is less than 2% of Apple's cash position. Then all you would have to do is replace enough board members to fire any executives or lawyers who try to would defend the trademark. Then sell the 51% to an investment firm who promised not to hire them back to recoup a large part of the purchase price. Done.
Although I dislike ITV as a broadcaster, I can see why they're preparing for a battle. Apple would not want to rename the product for one country (increase manufacturing, marketing costs etc) only over a naming issue.
ITV is a household name over here. To be honest, they should be discussing some licensing/exclusivity deal to get one over the BBC whilst they have a chance if Apple want to go down this route.
I mean, if they use the "i" name, all other suggestions such as iTube, iTelly, iVision all sound silly IMO.
This tie-up is well underway i reckon.
Meh, the Apple TV still sucks compared to TiVO. Sure it works with Apple stuff well, but WHERE IS THE COAX INPUT?!!!!!!?!!!!????????!
Well, the Apple TV is much better than similar things like Google TV (horrible) and stuff.
The Apple TV is nothing like a TiVo. A TiVo is a DVR, and Apple TV is a streaming device.
It's gonna be pretty weird if Apple starts selling TVs. Sure, TVs are consumer electronics, I just don't see it as Apple's thing. On the other hand, if they revolutionize the TV like they have done with so many other products, it could be a huge success.
Apple's arrogance and greed become more of a problem each day.
They just hiked the price of Whitney Houston music on iTunes to milk more profit from her sudden death.
[/COLOR]
Tim Cook replaced Steve Jobs in August, which was before Steve died. The sentence is completely factual, if only written in a confusing way.
Oh, that brings back memories! "and now, from Norwich, it's the quiz of the week."