I am a huuuuge fan of Apple. And not particularly a fan of ITV, I never really watch it. But ITV have existed for nearly 60 years. They have the right to this. And I sincerely hope Apple does not use its financial muscle to push this through.
Not a problem, Apple can just buy Elgato.
After all, that seems to be most people's answer these days whenever Apple get into a bit of a dispute with anyone.
aTV sounds fine to me.
sTV (s for smart)
i
Actually, ATV is/was a UK broadcaster as well before all the independents were borged into ITV (ITV used to be a sort of umbrella body for lots of independent regional broadcasters).
I don't know but it wouldn't surprise me if ITV own that trademark as well...
Silly troll. Did you actually read the story on Cisco? Superior or inferior doesn't matter. What you're claiming is that it's Apple so therefore superior with a free license to do anything. It doesn't work this way. Note how Apple has previously negotiated on other trademarks. If Apple has a good product in mind, it'll be fine no matter what they name it.
It doesn't matter if it's Apple or not.. If you have a farm that produces mustard, you name your mustard iTV, and Apple (or any other company, for that matter) wants to release a television set that will revolutionize the way the human race consumes entertainment, you don't say "you can't do that, because I own the trademark to iTV in another country, change the name to something else because my mustard is more important than your multi-billion dollar television set."
**** your mustard.
Not a very smart comment. iTV does own trademark in USA and they actually do TV not farming. They are revolutionazing TV experience all over the World (putting it into language which is easier to understand for iSheep).
Except the entire television industry is going to collapse over the next 5 years... everything is being driven to VOD services & wireless mobile delivery... so...
So? ITV produces content. Delivery method does not matter. In 5 years you will be watching ITV programs on your iTabTV provided by Apple.
It doesn't matter if it's Apple or not.. If you have a farm that produces mustard, you name your mustard iTV, and Apple (or any other company, for that matter) wants to release a television set that will revolutionize the way the human race consumes entertainment, you don't say "you can't do that, because I own the trademark to iTV in another country, change the name to something else because my mustard is more important than your multi-billion dollar television set."
**** your mustard.
Not a very smart comment. The entire television industry is going to collapse over the next 5 years... everything is being driven to VOD services & wireless mobile delivery... so...
television is a bit of misnomer anyway. 'Distant-Vision' Not really encompassing all the product can do nowdays
Bit like you tube - wheres the Tube? All the CRT's have been ditched.
Bit like the old threads about the apple tablet
iPad
iTab
iTablet
iSlate
Anyway if/when they bring one out I reckon on
iScreen
iVision
iPanel
iConnect
iSee![]()
I guess I've been successfully trolled as I'm responding here. First I wonder if iTV has the trademark registered worldwide. That would be interesting. Next you're silly for making assumptions about an unreleased potential product. Beyond that, look at the situation of Applecorps. It went into a legal battle and eventually Apple was granted the name with the condition that they not go into the music industry. When this happened decades later, they settled but Apple did end up paying. All you've stated is that Apple has a free pass to steal whatever they want.
And yet even if that happens in the future, it has no legal binding on the current situation.
I guess Apple could just buy the name if they wanted it.
Could ITV stand in their way..? Or will Apple's Billions just trump them.
Not a very smart comment. The entire television industry is going to collapse over the next 5 years... everything is being driven to VOD services & wireless mobile delivery... so...
Yeah, and who do you think is driving the transition to VOD? Who do you think is offering the content?
I'll give you a hint: the content providers. You know, the people who make the stuff you watch, and ultimately decide how it's distributed. They're also the people who are directly responsible for the fate of the future Apple TV. It could have the most awesome interface in the world. The most elegant solution to the daily grind of watching and recording video. But if the content providers don't agree to Apple's terms, then it doesn't get access to the shows everyone wants to watch. Then what's the use of the Apple TV?
Don't think that the future of television is in Apple's hands. It's more like the future of Apple's television is in the hands of the people who make the things people watch.
Someone said they registered it in the US too but I'm not sure.
I don't think it's too far-fetched to make assumptions about how the TV will perform.. look at the rest of the products Apple has released, it's not because of iSheep, iSheep exist, but Apple gets it.. none else seems to get it.
@Stealing.. it's kind of like naming a child.. If your friend named their kid x, and you like the name x, you may ask for their permission to use the name but even if they say no, it's your kid, name it what you want. In this case, it's not like Apple is using the name to springboard off of any kind of existing brand-power; at the moment it's released, everyone will know exactly what the iTV is, and noone will have any idea what ITV is (except for those of us on internet tech forums).
Hehe.. well that's not really how registered trademarks work, and in the UK, it seems to be a household name rather than an unknown one. Naming a child has nothing to do with trademarks. Assuming there is a tv, which seems likely (although it's unconfirmed) I'd expect it to do well too, but we haven't seen it.
ForgetiTV, waiting for the
iBox 360.
Valid point, but I think the cost benefit of consolidating communications and entertainment into 1 device is going to siphon subscribers from cable/satellite at a steady rate, until content providers cave and conform to whatever our choice is. It's our choice, not Fox, ITV, etc.
You mean "EyeTv? The tuner made by Elgato?Apple could save a fortune simply be creating a completely new character (as they did with their cmd symbol) which, and here's the clever bit, is pronounced "eye".