Re: This should not be a PAID upgrade
just remember, making a good OS is not cheap. Apple has to have the people who write the software, do the R&D, and a bunch of other stuff. now, you may say that open source is nice, and should be cheap (and it is), but it takes someone to put all of this stuff, and that is what Apple is doing. If they don't charge for their software, even major updates, then the software will start to suck. Apple has released 10-10.1.4 for free (some may argue about the 10.1) and with the MAJOR improvements in 10.2, Apple is justified in charging for the update. Besides, its their software, and their decision.
So, next time you complain about having to pay for something, just remember that there are people who make these things, and who have to work for it to make a living...
Originally posted by ezrabud
Having to pay for this upgrade is pathetic. I have purchased both the public beta and 10.1 and use neither of them for more than curiousity purposes. The operating system is great but still needs much work (performance sucks specifically); work that we should NOT be required to pay money for.
just remember, making a good OS is not cheap. Apple has to have the people who write the software, do the R&D, and a bunch of other stuff. now, you may say that open source is nice, and should be cheap (and it is), but it takes someone to put all of this stuff, and that is what Apple is doing. If they don't charge for their software, even major updates, then the software will start to suck. Apple has released 10-10.1.4 for free (some may argue about the 10.1) and with the MAJOR improvements in 10.2, Apple is justified in charging for the update. Besides, its their software, and their decision.
So, next time you complain about having to pay for something, just remember that there are people who make these things, and who have to work for it to make a living...