Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My best guess: Apple was trying to hike fees and milk them some more - and since JCP are already not doing great, they had to call it quits.


LOL. If this was your best guess, what were some of your other guesses as you thought you’d hate on Apple today? Apple Pay doesn’t cost the merchant anything. The bank pays the transaction fee of .015%, or 15 cents on a $100 purchase.
 
Wait, JCPenny is still around?? LOL

Guess not for much longer anyway. They will soon be joining Sears, KMart and Macy's in department store heaven.
 
How long did it take ? Europe and Canada had chip and pin, Contactless payments *years* prior to the US. That is "foot dragging".

Apple Pay was virtually available everywhere from Day One in Canada ( and probably Europe ) after banks starting supporting it.
Banks started supporting Apple Pay right from the beginning. The issue was merchants putting in contactless hardware.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stella
Same experience. I remember when Sears was thriving as well. Way back when Disney sold all their characters through Sears. My Aunt was an East Coast Manager for Women’s Clothing there. Every Christmas when I was “the age” I would get to go to Sears and pick out a giant Winnie- the- Pooh character. Man I feel dated. ;)
The advent of the internet for business transactions over the last 20 years has been commensurate with the fade of brick-and-mortar businesses, especially the large department store chains like Sears (& Roebuck), JC Penny, K-Mart, Foley's, Macy's, etc. Prior to web browsing and internet shopping, folks flocked to department stores as a convenient place for general shopping and browsing for products of interest. The closest thing to web browsing prior to the internet and "www" was window shopping at malls, where one or two department stores were usually the big draw, supplemented by mail order through publications like the Sears Catalog. The decline of department stores has been a parallel trend to the decline of hardcopy news and magazines, both losing ground to internet commerce and content consumption.

https://www.businessinsider.com/chart-shows-death-of-department-stores-2016-5
 
Wait, JCPenny is still around?? LOL

Guess not for much longer anyway. They will soon be joining Sears, KMart and Macy's in department store heaven.
Sears and KMart are one company. Macy's are quite alive, so it seems.
 
I'm becoming more wary of places where I can't use Apple pay. I've had my CC # stolen one too many times (not the card I use for online purchases), clearly from stores or restaurants where I've shopped that didn't take Apple Pay.

Pretty much preferentially shop at places that take it now. Kohl's, Wegman's, Dick's, Best Buy and Target are the main ones. Ironically, those last two were notorious ApplePay holdouts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MadeTheSwitch
Yes, though you're making the false assumption that Apple charges this fee to the merchant and/or that the processor passes it to the merchant. That does not appear to be the case.

Per this source, the merchant fees on ApplePay transactions are actually lower -- likely due to the higher security of ApplePay making fraud less likely. https://blog.bluepay.com/im-a-small-merchant-what-will-apple-pay-cost-for-me-to-get-up-and-running

This source says the fees stay the same: https://www.shopkeep.com/blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about-how-to-accept-apple-pay#step-1

Specifics of course will depend on the individual merchant agreement with their processing provider.
And you’re making the false assumption that merchant accounts benefit anyone but the banks. The fees, surcharges, aka the “vig” increase constantly. If there is any cost adder, as exists with ApplePay's transaction fee, you can be damn sure the bank is going to pass it on to the seller.
 
It’s not like I was going to shop at JCP anyway, but this seals the deal.

They join the ranks of Kroeger and Walmart as places I won’t patronize.

If a merchant won’t let me pay the way I want to, I’ll go to one that will. Simple as that.
 
This probably had something to do with the lack of usage or the terminals/transactions costing them money and it wasn't worth it to them. It's not like teens shop at JC Penny anyway so I'd bet low usage.
The fact that this guy felt the need to take it to Twitter is weird, does he really think using his credit card is not safe anymore because I can bet he swipes that way more than he can use Apple Pay. Get over it dude.
You’ve ONVIOUSLY never seen a Tablet+Paragon SW+Card swipe reader in action if you call swiping secure ;)

Where is that pic of credit card thief from that commercial, the geek guy with q models face ? Lol.
 
The historical reason for all this is that the telecommunication network in the U.S. has been historically more reliable, so credit card authentication could generally rely on centralized processing. In other countries there was considered a need to move more of the authentication to point-of-sale because centralized processing couldn’t always be relied upon. This led to the adoption of chip-and-pin, etc. where in the U.S. there was considered no need. As a result, contactless was already a thing by the time Apple Pay and google pay came around, but in the U.S. we were still always swiping magstripes, and it was more of a culture shock.

It is also because many the U.S. moved to take credit/charge cards much earlier than most of the rest of the world. Almost every store (even very small/low average transaction cost ones) has taken credit cards since the late 1980’s. Forcing merchants to upgrade to chip readers would be a much greater cost than it would have been had many not taken cards and were just buying a terminal for the first time (true in many places).

The switch to EMV in Europe also changed the fraud liability to the consumer, encouraging merchants to upgrade their terminals, a change that happened much more recently here (again, due in large part to the cost of switching so many terminals).
 
  • Like
Reactions: ssgbryan and cmaier
They probably needed the customer data as another revenue stream because they circling the drain, and since Apple won't provide it to them, they are forcing the issue on their customers by making them use a less secure solution that can perhaps give them a trickle of income. Of course, considering a decent segment of their customer base still uses a paper check to pay, whatever.
 
Can’t say I use Apple Pay at stores as it is. Too much hassle. Not enough incentive from Apple. This Apple card on the way is a joke gesture from them.


While I appreciate that everyone has (and is entitled to) a different perspective, I'm curious about your statement. What exactly is "too much hassle" about using ApplePay? Also, what incentives would you like to see from Apple?

For the record (MY USE CASE ONLY) ApplePay is just too easy... and I would be delighted to see all retailers finally transition to supporting contactless payments. I have six (6) different cards loaded into AP, including a corporate card, and both using AP and switching between cards is easy. Certainly no more difficult that pulling out my wallet, and because I have a default/primary card that is used for 90% of purchases it is far easier.
[doublepost=1555944623][/doublepost]
Apple charges a 0.15% per transaction “security fee” to card issuers. They were the only company that negotiated any sort of deal like this, Google and Samsung charge nothing.

So? That's between Apple and VISA/MasterCard/Amex... not individual merchants. If Apple eliminate the fee - or doubled it - merchants would see zero difference.
 
Sears and KMart are one company. Macy's are quite alive, so it seems.
No its not. Macy's is in real trouble as are most mall department stores. They are closing stores this year which is only the beginning. Thats how it all starts. Plus less and less people are going to stores in general. Everything is e-commerce now, even food.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDColorado
Not that I did before this, but one less reason to shop at JC. I understand cut backs from a company on life support the better part of this decade, but if they're worried about a 0.15% fee, they've got bigger fish to fry.

They had roughly 13 billion dollars in revenue last year. Theoretically, if they sold that 13 billion dollars worth of merchandise using ONLY Apple Pay, the fee would be under 20 million. Seems pretty negligible in the grand scheme of things. And my guess, less than a quarter of customers actually use Apple Pay which brings that figure down to under 5 million.
 
And you’re making the false assumption that merchant accounts benefit anyone but the banks. The fees, surcharges, aka the “vig” increase constantly. If there is any cost adder, as exists with ApplePay's transaction fee, you can be damn sure the bank is going to pass it on to the seller.

Seems to me that merchant accounts benefit both the merchant and the bank. Open a retail store which only accepts cash and let me know how that works out for you. Even Aldi had to suck it up and start accepting credit cards.

Please cite where a merchant is paying higher rates for ApplePay transactions. Pretty much every resource I've read, of which I've cited two, indicates the fees are at least the same if not lower.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacNeb
I suspect Apple will see some push back from other credit card issuers because of Apple Card. I'm sure some of them aren't too happy about it.

I wouldn't assume this is because of that, but if JCPenney's card was usable with Apple Pay that could be the reason. I can see Apple Card becoming the default credit card used with Apple Pay for many people, significantly reducing the use of cards issued by others. Perhaps JCPenney thinks that, if people have to pull out a physical card (instead of just using Apple Pay), some will use their JCPenney card instead of their default Apple Pay card.
I disagree, apple card interest rate r high as hell and the reward system is a joke, probably only die hard apple fanboys and apple apologist would get onboard the whole titanium looking card
 
Silly to risk dropping an expensive phone just to make simple payments that can be done with free plastic card so they're doing consumers a favor.
 
JCP is struggling. They had a leader that was trying to push them into the 21st century and they fired him. So yep, the more they alienate people the less people shop there. Eventually they will shutter and go the way of blockbuster and others that never caught up with the times. It's too bad.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.