Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I, too, wish that classical music was properly dealt with in iTunes. It's been fifteen years now, and still the metadata is all over the place. And why do we not get any information when we buy an album? CDs are intrinsically superior, in that they have all the libretti, translations, information on the pieces, information on the performers and photos. Mind-boggling that iTunes still hasn't caught up.
 
"We're going to do whatever we believe is great. We are going to make a combination of tech and popular culture that is exciting and adept at both areas. So that's what you're starting to see. It's going to have a voice. It's not going to be just a utility -- "Go here and get your music, good luck," or, "We're going to send you a list" -- that's great, but that's not what this is. That's not what this was, anyway."

Seriously? How can someone so moronic become so wealthy?
 
What complete balls this guy is talking.

Maybe Ive has adopted a new approach...."we took the existing Jimmy, gave him a huge amount of money and made him thicker...."
 
"we'll build a music service that is technologically and culturally adept."

43373020.jpg
He would have done a better job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: [AUT] Thomas
Thanks for the info. I have been using iTunes exclusively for 10 years or so. So I am sure I have all the data it needs. I used Apple Music extensively before this last update, I'll give the new update a go and see how it does.

I honestly can't gush about them enough, although YMMV. I look forward to them every Wednesday and Friday with great anticipation. It's the first thing I check when I get up in the morning.
 
I pay for and use Apple Music. Is it worth my money? I'm not convinced so far. It is an awkward and limited view on music. I want access and introduction that is customized to me. But I also don't want to have to say like or dislike to every song. As an example with radio, most of the time I just listen while I do many, many things. But if the music doesn't fit me, I stop listening. If I have to interact with every song to be "correct," I'm not interested. And eventually, I won't pay again for the same. For this user, this is Apple's conundrum. I want it and will pay but don't want to have to actively interact with every song. I just want good music. I will pay for that.
 
Take a look at Plex app premium music section, see how well it's organized, easy to use and beautiful. Watch and Learn Apple. It costs me 40$ a year to stream my own music from my own Plex server but I didn't find a better alternative yet.

It's depressing, really. I used to live in iTunes back in 2009-2014.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawk999
I liked Apple Music but I just wasn't listening to enough new stuff justify the cost and because I owned a ton of music already it felt like i was paying for stuff I already owned.

If anything it weirdly made me buy more music to plug gaps in my collection.
 
Not something you hear every day...

All of these "in the pipeline" interviews. There must be a big blockage somewhere seeing as they keep talking about these exciting things, rather than releasing them.


Edit: Beaten to it by wilheimer!
He knows how to pander to fellow execs.
 
a "culturally adept" music service? WTF does that even mean?
All I can think of is how social these services are becoming. Like, just today a friend made a (I don't know how Spotify works in the slightest) public playlist that others could add songs into. Maybe they mean to make something that's ingrained into our lives.

I dunno. It's only music and folk get so serious about it.
 
Never liked this guy, he's not useful in this realm for music. That and the UI/UX is still a mess. Loved the original iPod UI on iPhone OS. They need a little more courage than this...
 
  • Like
Reactions: tonyr6
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.