Anyone not on Craig’s team most likely ignored him (or was instructed to ignore him)zBut Craig is not in charge of AI. And accord to Mark Gurman he voiced concerns about this stuff not working. So who didn’t listen to him?
Please show me these news media appearances by Gruber disparaging Apple’s forthcoming announcements.I’m sure some days he does. I seriously think some of these tech pundits say things to manipulate the stock based on if they’re selling or buying at the time. Every time before an iPhone event, I hear them go on the news saying they don’t think Apple is going to release anything innovative this year, so the stock goes down. Then the event happens and they’re all excited like wow look what Apple just did. The stock goes up.
Gruber said the personalized Siri features announced during the WWDC keynote last year were merely conceptual, and therefore "********":
Mr Cook, Please wake up mate. It's not about money.
But they never fixed MapsThe Apple of the past would have held people accountable like with the iOS 6 maps debacle.
Did I say Gruber? Let me find my quote real quick hold on.Please show me these news media appearances by Gruber disparaging Apple’s forthcoming announcements.
I seriously think some of these tech pundits say things to manipulate the stock based on if they’re selling or buying at the time. Every time before an iPhone event, I hear them go on the news saying they don’t think Apple is going to release anything innovative this year, so the stock goes down.
Well I’m not exactly sure how this works as Apple Intelligence isn’t a stand alone product but is embedded in the operating systems. Craig was the one who announced it at WWDC. But maybe his concerns were ignored and he had to swallow hard and go along with the final decision.Anyone not on Craig’s team most likely ignored him (or was instructed to ignore him)z
As is normal in corporate settings, you get told to sit down and stay in your lane when you voice your opinion that goes against the grain and isn’t applicable to your department.
As much as people hate on it, Siri is critical to Apple’s future. It’s frustrating that so little is said about Siri from senior executives at Apple.
Like the transition from a cursor based UI to multi-touch, a transition from touch to voice UI is imminent. That’s not to say that touch will go away, only that voice UI will become effortless and very prominent. When multi touch appeared, people still continued to use cursor based UIs on Mac for example, but it’s inarguable that a vast majority of ”computer” users today use multi-touch devices.
The same will happen with voice UI. All three of Apple’s newest categories: Apple Watch, AirPods and HomePod use voice primarily with the latter devices using it incrementally more than the first. Reality Glasses are likely going to use voice UI in some capacity.
No exaggeration, if Tim Cook underestimated Siri’s importance to the future of the company and drops the ball on this, it could be his Steve Balmer vs iPhone moment.
I got it Siri is absolute hot garbage but is the competition that much better? We’re talking about Bixby if it’s still around Google on android, and Alexa. The last time I saw anyone that did a remotely unbiased comparison Siri did poorly, but it wasn’t like the other ones were that far ahead. This was probably over a year ago though so maybe they’ve improved significantly?2 years ago I said:
Got the usual MacRumors short sighted dismissal typical of that famous iPod thread.
I ended with this:
Yup.
Completely agree. AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, AI!All I see here are a bunch of people that don’t know what AI means for them complaining about the absence of something completely nebulous. And when Apple delivers it, they’ll go crazy. What? You’re going to leave the Apple ecosystem so you can have a different AI assistant make up a limerick about frottage and text it to your buddies while you drive? Get real.