There is a difference Apple showed stuff that wasn’t even functional & just showed a concept video & tried to pass that off as coming soon. Yet they had no reality that it would actually workI’m sure Apple is hiring if anyone have these innovative ideas that would drive their stock through roof. It’s easy for people Gruber and even myself to say no Apple should do it this way. How many of those people have run a multi trillion dollar company? I sure haven’t and I don’t think Gruber has. Has he even run a multi billion dollar company?
This is like me telling a Super Bowl winning football team “Well you could’ve done better. If I was the coach, here’s what I would’ve done and you would’ve won the Super Bowl twice in one year.” Tim Cook has won the Super Bowl. John Gruber is on the sidelines complaining about the winning field goal and saying how he could’ve got a touchdown.
Well...They need Scott Forstall. They need that Steve-esque abrasiveness and obsession with perfection.
They do? How? I read it for free.His inability to score the juiciest leaks is what he’s really pissed about.People pay THOUSANDS a year to read his words, so he takes Apple more reliably firing his contacts personally.
The software is getting buggier & buggier because after they do it in house it then gets sent out to beta testers who either aren’t actually beta testing it & just using it as normal software or when people do report bugs it’s not getting investigated.Well...
Forstall was "kicked out" because of his mishandling of the Apple Maps rollout.
This was actually a pretty similar case.
Apple for years overpromised that they will have a world-class Maps app, able to take on "the other guys" - only to fall flat on their face with a really laughable rollout, lacking most key features and still full of bugs.
Everyone on that team must have seen this coming. Including Forstall.
So why roll it out? Terrible misjudgment.
Yet if he learnt his lesson from this disaster, then maybe he is the right man to get Apple software development back on track.
Apple software has been getting buggier and buggier over the years, with more and more first day software updates, which still had big bugs, and more and more features being pushed back again and again, or even scrapped.
Instead of focussing on fixing these issues, Apple deludes themselves with constant UI overhauls, turning macOS more and more into a mobile device OS - that no one asked for - except for Apple, so that people forget about the core software feature disasters...
The leading HARDWARE AI company. Lack of Nvidia chips didn’t make Apple promise software they couldn’t deliver."Something Is Rotten in the State of Cupertino," - oh really? Something is rotten at Apple, since it turned from a „one more thing“ into a „the best iPhone ever“ company.
And, Mr Gruber, this hasn‘t happened yesterday. It was obvious since Apple missed the Cloud and dropped the AppleCar. The AI miss was immanent since Apple banned NVidia/CUDA from its platforms - the leading AI company.
of course I did. But what you said goes back to what I said: the author does not understand LLMs. What I mean with that is that you do not show work-in-progress. And Apple has, by most accounts, not done that. They usually polish to almost an extreme where others would not go. With LLMs still hallucinating and eating resources on mobiles, e.g. battery, optimization and other tweaks are very necessary.Did you even read the article? It wasn’t about praising or criticizing AI, it was about Apple promising a feature that was nowhere near ready.
also, Apple is leading AI by a mile after NVidia and their extremely highly priced hardware. Nobody else comes close.The leading HARDWARE AI company. Lack of Nvidia chips didn’t make Apple promise software they couldn’t deliver.
Or, Gruber is desperate for attention as the tech media is mostly AIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAI these days ... and Gruber knows nothing about it and is left out of the conversation.When Gruber, the unofficial head cheer leader of apple calls them out, you know the situation is bad.
Yeah, as we all know it is illegal to boycott X.Gruber is a partisan hack who won’t even post on X anymore since he hates Musk. I wouldn’t take business advice from him.
Let’s make no bones about this forstall got kicked out because according to reports they wanted rid of him & where just looking for an excuse to remove him.Well...
Forstall was "kicked out" because of his mishandling of the Apple Maps rollout.
This was actually a pretty similar case.
Apple for years overpromised that they will have a world-class Maps app, able to take on "the other guys" - only to fall flat on their face with a really laughable rollout, lacking most key features and still full of bugs.
Everyone on that team must have seen this coming. Including Forstall.
So why roll it out? Terrible misjudgment.
Yet if he learnt his lesson from this disaster, then maybe he is the right man to get Apple software development back on track.
Apple software has been getting buggier and buggier over the years, with more and more first day software updates, which still had big bugs, and more and more features being pushed back again and again, or even scrapped.
Instead of focussing on fixing these issues, Apple deludes themselves with constant UI overhauls, turning macOS more and more into a mobile device OS - that no one asked for - except for Apple, so that people forget about the core software feature disasters...
I’m sorry, I don’t understand what you mean here. Please rephrase.also, Apple is leading AI by a mile after NVidia and their extremely highly priced hardware. Nobody else comes close.
The things you list, while I agree with all of them (other than MacBooks with keyboards that "couldn't be typed on"), are fairly "business as usual", especially for a company as big as Apple. Abandoned products, buggy software, extracting "service" income are all pretty much business as usual for tech companies and Apple probably does better than its competitors in many of these.....this is the thing that did it for him?
Not over 10 years of dropping the ball on Siri?
Not the ever-more buggy iOS platforms?
Not a business model that is increasingly built on rent-seeking?
Not selling commodity storage and memory for 5x or more than the industry standard because they know their customers have no other choice?
Not several years of selling defective macbooks who's keyboards couldn't be typed on?
Not billions wasted on a car that never made sense and never came to market?
![]()
In a blog post titled "Something Is Rotten in the State of Cupertino," Gruber said Apple's credibility has been "damaged" by the delay:This obviously isn't the first time that Apple has failed to deliver. However, Gruber said other examples like the canceled AirPower charging mat "tended to be around the edges," whereas he believes that generative AI is going to be "big" and "important."
It's not the delay by itself that bothers Gruber. He said the true "fiasco" here is that Apple "pitched a story" last year "that wasn't true":Gruber said the personalized Siri features announced during the WWDC keynote last year were merely conceptual, and therefore "********":He was even more explicit here:Gruber said Apple's repeated unwillingness or inability to demo the personalized Siri features in action since WWDC last year "should have set off blinding red flashing lights and deafening klaxon alarms" in his head that something was wrong.
Gruber went as far as saying that Apple's culture of excellence could be at risk if this situation is not handled correctly within the company:The full post is worth a read.
Article Link: John Gruber Says 'Something is Rotten' at Apple
Meaning the work was not actually in progress, or that it never existed in a real way? They rolled out a prominent feature in beta. If that’s not work-in-progress, I don’t know what is.What I mean with that is that you do not show work-in-progress. And Apple has, by most accounts, not done that.
I bought the iPhone 16 based on the promise that it will include the features that they have listed during the announcement. I trusted Apple to deliver everything said and was willing to wait for a small delay as they said - but now it seems that they have knowingly misled us all. Had I known in advance, I may have decided to skip this generation and wait for the next one. My older iPhone was still okay for my needs. I think that Apple should reimburse me for the lower product spec. I think at least 15% of the phone value should return to customers. AI today is a key product feature, and it was the main reason for me to get this phone.Totally agree with Gruber. They mislead the public into believing they’d get some great AI features a few months down the road - but only if they upgraded their iPhones. Analysts went as far as calling for an iPhone upgrade supercycle due to these great AI features. Most prominent/exciting being a Siri that knows about you. And that is the exact feature that turns out to be vaporware - for the entire iPhone 16 cycle! So the trust is broken. You can no longer believe what Apple tells you.
Upgrade to the iPhone17, where Apple will bring the new set of features definetly... later... maybe... hopefully... I guess?I bought the iPhone 16 based on the promise that it will include the features that they have listed during the announcement. I trusted Apple to deliver everything said and was willing to wait for a small delay as they said - but now it seems that they have knowingly misled us all. Had I known in advance, I may have decided to skip this generation and wait for the next one. My older iPhone was still okay for my needs. I think that Apple should reimburse me for the lower product spec. I think at least 15% of the phone value should return to customers. AI today is a key product feature, and it was the main reason for me to get this phone.