Phil Schiller
I think you're on to something here.... It seemed to me like Jobs was making an attempt to get Phil used to appearing and doing some "presenting" at recent Keynotes, and maybe there's a hidden motive behind that.
Don't forget, he was recently doing a lot of talking about things like "future direction of the iPhone", and completely contradicted the "party line" on apps development and iPhone hacking that Jobs was going with. That seemed a bit odd to me -- almost like Jobs decided to throw Schiller out there into the media without "briefing" him first on what he wanted to say (or not say). That very well could have been another attempt at prepping him for a future leadership role at Apple?
Making Ives the CEO makes little sense, because that would take away from his ability to contribute with the skills he has to offer them ... designing artistic cases for their products.
I think you're on to something here.... It seemed to me like Jobs was making an attempt to get Phil used to appearing and doing some "presenting" at recent Keynotes, and maybe there's a hidden motive behind that.
Don't forget, he was recently doing a lot of talking about things like "future direction of the iPhone", and completely contradicted the "party line" on apps development and iPhone hacking that Jobs was going with. That seemed a bit odd to me -- almost like Jobs decided to throw Schiller out there into the media without "briefing" him first on what he wanted to say (or not say). That very well could have been another attempt at prepping him for a future leadership role at Apple?
Making Ives the CEO makes little sense, because that would take away from his ability to contribute with the skills he has to offer them ... designing artistic cases for their products.
Ive would be no doubt a good choice, but I don't think the best choice. I think the best choice is someone we won't expect.
Ive is not a trained or schooled in programming or marketing. He's an artist.
Phil Schiller wouldn't be bad.