Subtle difference between:Don't forget that many of the the companies we now know of started in their garage![]()
Starting off in a garage
aaaand…
Finishing in a garage sale!
/jk
Subtle difference between:Don't forget that many of the the companies we now know of started in their garage![]()
He chose Sculley too.And you think the legendary Steve Jobs, whom you praised twice, personally chose a poor successor?
Oh! I thought ti was all about the garage. Didn't matter if it started or ended there. I thought the magic was the garage and nothing else /s 😂. P.S Good response ArkitectSubtle difference between:
Starting off in a garage
aaaand…
Finishing in a garage sale!
/jk
Jumping in here...yes, I do. I do not think Jobs was thinking on the same level during the end of his life. Why on earth would he have a penny pinching Ops guy take over for him. It makes no sense. He should've chosen someone who was huge on making great products and also huge on design. He ended up choosing someone who was nothing like him. When you are on the trajectory that Jobs created, you do not change course mid-voyage. Sure, Apple is the world's top company, but their products are boring and innovation has all but ceased. I'm a shareholder but I'd still rather see someone running the company who was more like Jobs.
Funny you should say that. In manner, Cook has often struck me as better suited to a company such as Dell or Microsoft rather than Apple. After Jobs, a CEO and how they come across is inevitably going to contribute to the wider brand. And no matter how many times I hear Cook's Alabama vowels strangulate the phrase "At Apple...", he just doesn't seem to convince.Tim Cook wouldn't have been able to do this if he was CEO of Samsung.
Well, before he flipped his lid I think Musk could've been a great successor. Not so much anymore. In a world filled with billions of people, there were better options than Cook.The decision was made before his sharp decline in health the last year or so. There was much consternation about succession at the time and he made a public statement well ahead of stepping down.
I don’t completely disagree with you, but who then? Considering what we’ve read of their private email from court cases over the last decade, I don’t think any of the executives are like him where it matters.
I agree Tim is no Steve but I think Steve also remembered the times when Apple wasn’t doing so hot financially, and chose someone who would not let that happen again.
Let's kindly and smartly stop talking about rich lunatics
OpenAI's CEO Once Bragged About His Hoard of Guns and Gas Masks - Futurism
I truly believe we should send a bunch of these rich doomers, frauds and preppers to a remote island and let them Battle Royale themselves for our entertainment.
Then we won't have to deal with them wasting stupid amounts money and tons of electricity on their toys and eccentric lifestyles.
Good job, Tim Cook! You fired the greatest UI designer in history, Scott Forstall, and couldn't retain one of the greatest industrial designers in history, Jony Ive.
Exactly! Jobs had a history of picking garbage successors.He chose Sculley too.
Well, before he flipped his lid I think Musk could've been a great successor. Not so much anymore. In a world filled with billions of people, there were better options than Cook.
Except that you're dismissing the idea that people can learn with age and experience. Scully was a mistake and Jobs knew it relatively quickly. Cook was a good choice by the older, wiser Jobs, and was a good successor for him. He remains that. Ives was useful for a good while, but his work diminished over time and he is no longer relevant.Exactly! Jobs had a history of picking garbage successors.
I'm not going to disagree with you here.Musk is a charlatan if there ever was one. Always has been, always will be.
Exactly! Jobs had a history of picking garbage successors.
Cook can learn with age and experience but he hasn't become a product and design guy, and he never will. He only cares about the bottom line. He was a great Ops and supply chain guy though, probably the best ever.Except that you're dismissing the idea that people can learn with age and experience. Scully was a mistake and Jobs knew it relatively quickly. Cook was a good choice by the older, wiser Jobs, and was a good successor for him. He remains that. Ives was useful for a good while, but his work diminished over time and he is no longer relevant.
Well, before he flipped his lid I think Musk could've been a great successor. Not so much anymore. In a world filled with billions of people, there were better options than Cook.
Except that you're dismissing the idea that people can learn with age and experience. Scully was a mistake and Jobs knew it relatively quickly. Cook was a good choice by the older, wiser Jobs, and was a good successor for him. He remains that. Ives was useful for a good while, but his work diminished over time and he is no longer relevant.
Form wasn't even that great, though he did have some very nice designs.Not sure if that would be a good idea. Ive always prioritized form over function.
This is called gaslighting.Just came on here to support Sir Jonny Ive because I know how much hate (jealously) people have for him.
1000%. He made way too many trade offs, especially in performance. That approach is why the Mac Pro is a big meh. A good Nvidia GPU run circles around it.Sure, noble and all that…
But often a lot of functionality was seriously compromised in that search for what you describe as simplicity.