But, of course, Apple never copy. That's left to Samsung...
Samsung studies to learn what TO DO.
Apple studies to learn what NOT TO DO. Less is more.
But, of course, Apple never copy. That's left to Samsung...
But, of course, Apple never copy. That's left to Samsung...
As a Certified Master Watchmaker, I can attest to major changes in the way watches are perceived. Just since the 90's when Rolex and others of that level sold everything they could produce, the market has changed. Watches are unitaskers. They tell the time. A 100k$ Swiss watch may tell you the phase of the moon and the time in Moscow but it's still a time instrument. Watchmaking is retreating to the high ground as manufacturing technology make sever fancier models possible at ever more extravagant prices. But watch purchases are declining. it's a piece of jewelry to most who still wear them. Most people who wear a five-figure watch will check the time on their smartphones. One client came in with his fancy calendar watch and joked that he had been wearing it for two weeks before he noticed it had stopped working.
There is a market for something new and better. A wrist data center would open up a whole new market that others can only scratch at. If Apple is working on such a product, I think the time is just about right for it. Like the iPhone, there will be a discovery process of customer and manufacturer learning what is possible and what is wanted. But the time is coming soon.
Watch out, it's time!
As a Certified Master Watchmaker, I can attest to major changes in the way watches are perceived. Just since the 90's when Rolex and others of that level sold everything they could produce, the market has changed. Watches are unitaskers. They tell the time. A 100k$ Swiss watch may tell you the phase of the moon and the time in Moscow but it's still a time instrument. Watchmaking is retreating to the high ground as manufacturing technology make sever fancier models possible at ever more extravagant prices. But watch purchases are declining. it's a piece of jewelry to most who still wear them. Most people who wear a five-figure watch will check the time on their smartphones. One client came in with his fancy calendar watch and joked that he had been wearing it for two weeks before he noticed it had stopped working.
There is a market for something new and better. A wrist data center would open up a whole new market that others can only scratch at. If Apple is working on such a product, I think the time is just about right for it. Like the iPhone, there will be a discovery process of customer and manufacturer learning what is possible and what is wanted. But the time is coming soon.
A quick glance at the watch will tell you who's calling without having to stop walking, and it's one button press to send the call to voicemail. Same for texts, one glance and you got most of it.
THAT is the iWatch? So ugly
But, of course, Apple never copy. That's left to Samsung...
"It's just too thin!"Can't wait for the "You're holding it wrong" thread on that one.
Samsung studies to learn what TO DO.
Apple studies to learn what NOT TO DO. Less is more.
riiiigghtttt....
actually you may have a point.
Apple probably studied google maps and learned how NOT to make a worthwhile map offering.
It has been said the Steve Jobs had left at least a 5 year plan for Apple to proceed with and I surmise that the 'iWatch' was thoroughly brain-stormed prior to his death. I would expect we should see a hands free communication device that will knock the socks off the skeptics that will come out in various states of upgrade for the next few years.
GermanyChris ordered a Seiko dive watch in the early 2000's..
Whats the point??
Said by who? Please find me an actual source from within Apple that has said what you and so many on the damn forum have stated.
In fact the only place I have even seen it mentioned is on this forum.
The number of myths and FUD mentioned once and then repeated without there ever being a source is becoming almost as alarming as something from 2007 making the front page.