Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, if it is a cheap gizmo that allows for instant translation...those of us who cannot really learn another language for a quick trip to Paris or Madrid...would love it is my guess.
 
Have to wait and see. Not sure how an AI only device will be successful. Pricing has to be right and hopefully there won't be a subscription tied to the device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
It’s a monitoring device that constantly records your activity and transcribes your conversations. Just think of all the arguments you could win by replaying a prior conversation! Expect a monthly subscription fee to go along with it.
 
According to the report, the device isn't a pair of glasses, given that Ive has been skeptical about building something you have to wear. It's not a phone either, since Ive and Altman want to help wean people off of screens.
That sounds bad. For all the flack they get, people like screens, they know how to use screens, and screens are needful to display info. for reading (since most of us don't read braille).

The alternative is auditory communication - the device 'talks' to you, which means people around you have to put up with its transmission. Like when you're at a restaurant, in line or on public transportation and someone is talking on their phone like no one else is around. Some people strongly oppose cell phone service on planes because the thought of being trapped next to a 'yakker' is just too much.

If this thing doesn't have a screen, it'd better broadcast to one. How does something electronic without a screen communication only to the user in a manner that's not disruptive to others? Generate print outs?

Rather, it's described as a "third core device" after a MacBook Pro and an iPhone.
So it's not a wearable but could be in your pocket or on your desk. So wherever you might use it, you're probably wearing your phone, and at your desk you've got a full computer. How is this gadget going to be preferable to using one of those?

I wonder if they really got the idea from Christopher Nolan’s Batman trilogy when Batman uses phones and sonar to map everywhere.

In that film it was deemed unethical and the system destroyed.
If one person/entity can do it, others will be able to do it, and if doing it will bring power (e.g.: money, government control, etc...), somebody's gonna do it. Probably a number of somebodies.
 
Details have leaked about the device that OpenAI is developing with former Apple designer Jony Ive. OpenAI is acquiring io, the hardware-based AI startup co-created by Jony Ive, and the first product is one of a family of devices the company intends to launch.
Yesterday, i was convinced this “core” device would come in the form of a contact lense. Today i know it will be a false tooth or an implant. You can opt for a partial for additional functions such as 360° cameras (includes a dentist discount coupon). Caveat: Must smile to record video.
 
I realize I might be in the tiny minority on this one, but how people are so willing to willingly share all that information with A.I. or "A.I.", have it basically spy on you at all times and share that info with whatever servers, your whole life just open for a company or a state.

It disgusts me.

One, I think it’s more a lack of comprehension, understanding and "creative mindset" to mentally visualise what could be issues.

Two, the issue is not sharing "private", as this is a misnomer in this day and age. Because all the information YOU have is digitised somewhere else and accessible to more parties than yourself. It’s more what those that produce information about you (us) can do with it that’s the difference.

Three, it won’t be long before AI can lawfully access on its own accord public information, databases AND insurance companies etc. Companies already share information, it just needs to be programmed into AI to navigate this.

Four, we absolutely definitely not maybe need actual privacy laws. You own your own information. No debate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bungaree.Chubbins
Somehow I am confident in Ive's ability to deliver something good. I think this might be a good product.
 
Somehow I am confident in Ive's ability to deliver something good. I think this might be a good product.
If I could attach it to my iPhone as I do with the wallet....but where would I keep my cards and id?
Sure we get more of cads stored in Apple-account and use contact-less - but it's not working everywhere here yet unfortunately.
But maybe this devive is thin as a card? That will do it.
 
They would be insane to hype it like this if it’s not half as good as the claim.
Reminds me of the Humane AI Pin

The product will be capable of being fully aware of a user's surroundings and life, will be unobtrusive, able to rest in one's pocket or on one's desk, and would be a third core device a person would put on their desk after a MacBook Pro and an iPhone.
Am I the only one who definitely doesn’t want a device aware of my surroundings It’s enough to have my phone aware of my location

And what exactly is this device going to do with this awareness? What can’t a phone already do? What does this improve that will make this a third pillar of devices in our lives?
 
All this hype around something that'll probably just turn out to be just another AI pin type device which gets bricked the moment you stop paying an expensive monthly subscription.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maxoakland
They would be insane to hype it like this if it’s not half as good as the claim.
AI has the potential to disrupt some paradigms. It's the software finally catching up to what modern hardware is capable of. Trying to design new hardware around it doesn't work though. We humans want to interface directly with our devices and get instantaneous feedback – that's why they're designed for us to touch, type, scroll.

AI can automate repetitive or complex tasks but it can't fully replace direct interaction.
 
AI has the potential to disrupt some paradigms. It's the software finally catching up to what modern hardware is capable of. Trying to design new hardware around it doesn't work though. We humans want to interface directly with our devices and get instantaneous feedback – that's why they're designed for us to touch, type, scroll.

AI can automate repetitive or complex tasks but it can't fully replace direct interaction.
I’m not sure the intent of this device is to replace interaction, but rather to add an ambient computing dimension to the stuff we’re already doing. From what I understand the *ideal* of this device is that it sees and remembers everything you do.

So it’s like, imagine if you had an all-knowing person with you who can recall everything, like where you last saw your keys or the name of that person you spoke to two months ago. And therefore it can also engage in conversations with you about experiences you’ve had, and perhaps spark a deeper understanding the things around you and even yourself. Again, that’s the ideal, I think.

But my skepticism is that I think it’s important that this is deeply baked into your computing OS/ecosystem, because it ought to also know what you’re doing on your computing devices too (like Apple’s announced feature that hasn’t yet made it to users yet).
 
I’m not sure the intent of this device is to replace interaction, but rather to add an ambient computing dimension to the stuff we’re already doing. From what I understand the *ideal* of this device is that it sees and remembers everything you do.

So it’s like, imagine if you had an all-knowing person with you who can recall everything, like where you last saw your keys or the name of that person you spoke to two months ago. And therefore it can also engage in conversations with you about experiences you’ve had, and perhaps spark a deeper understanding the things around you and even yourself. Again, that’s the ideal, I think.

But my skepticism is that I think it’s important that this is deeply baked into your computing OS/ecosystem, because it ought to also know what you’re doing on your computing devices too (like Apple’s announced feature that hasn’t yet made it to users yet).
That was the intent of the AI pins also, but they never caught on because an “ambient device” without direct interaction will always be a niche. A smartphone or smartwatch can be an “ambient device” also by the way, all the necessary hardware is there - just give it the proper software.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maxoakland
That was the intent of the AI pins also, but they never caught on because an “ambient device” without direct interaction will always be a niche. A smartphone or smartwatch can be an “ambient device” also by the way, all the necessary hardware is there - just give it the proper software.
But how does a phone or a watch see what you see constantly, throughout the day?
 
From what I understand the *ideal* of this device is that it sees and remembers everything you do.

So it’s like, imagine if you had an all-knowing person with you who can recall everything, like where you last saw your keys or the name of that person you spoke to two months ago.
I'm getting Deja Vu from reading about the flack Microsoft got for the 'Recall' feature to be added to Windows PCs. And that was just on their computers. Something you wear/carry around all day constantly recording (perhaps recording people around you?) with a long memory...wow.

I doubt this is feasible right now, but even if it were...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bungaree.Chubbins
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.