matticus008 said:I'm not cutting Apple any slack. They have a policy, they followed it, a chargeback here would be ruled in Apple's favor, end of story. Don't act like I'm somehow giving Apple special treatment as a company. Everyone has had high dollar purchases that aren't 100% flawless and had to live with them. My bumper had a panel gap of .34" on the right side and only .19" on the left side, and it was a not-inexpensive car of German manufacture, but the panel gap had to be at least .4" to be eligible for free adjustment, so even though looking at it from the front, the left side hung lower, I had to live with it. Eventually, I paid to have it adjusted myself because it bothered me.
You have a right to voice your concern and dissatisfaction, but you are not entitled, legally, to anything else here. The machine is within production tolerances--in legal terms, the computer is not defective. They may choose to help you, but you are not entitled to anything. It's like buying a piece of Sterling silver and having yours come out to 99.91% purity and someone else has 99.93% purity. You might be dissatisfied that your tea set is slightly less pure, but it's still Sterling silver and you got what you paid for.
I never said I *supported* the policy. It is what it is, and I don't set policy in this particular industry.fatsoforgotso said:I think you are being way too supportive of what is essentially a corporate policy, and a very strict one at that.
The screen doesn't need to be replaced. Apple will gladly take the iMac back with a restocking fee, which they are rightfully collecting, again in accordance with published policy. It helps offset the $200+ loss that they incur by selling the perfectly normal, working computer as refurbished. Is this person's satisfaction worth $200 to Apple? No, of course not. And it's not something that's endemic of bad service--this is nothing more than buyer's remorse, and contrary to your beliefs, Apple can't afford to take returns left and right for no particular reason. Of course Apple should try to deal with the OP's concerns, but they aren't obligated to, and they should not be condemned for failing to go above and beyond for every customer. If they did, they'd long be out of business.For what it costs Apple to just accept the iMac back, and replace the screen and resell, is extremely minimal to what they are losing in terms of a the original poster's customer satisfaction.
Any computer company can afford to offer flawless hardware; it's the suppliers who can't provide it and the customers that cause the problems. Manufacturers simply can't provide 100% flawless hardware 100% of the time effectively, at any price--it slows them down too much and produces tons of waste. For example, most Intel processors have a manufacturing error somewhere in them--an error that usually means nothing for a user, but it's there--and they already discard about 1/3 of their processors. On top of that, people already bitch about Apple computers being "expensive" and so the number of people that would tolerate an additional price hike of at least 15% or so is fairly small, all to do away with an already low error rate. It's the law of diminishing returns. Cutting the error rate further would cost more than it's worth.I think Apple should provide us with flawless hardware, it's not like they can't afford the highter quality control it would require, and with such a small percentage of computer users on Apple hardware, they should be make it their business to produce flawless machines.
Apple makes computers from parts supplied by the same manufacturers as other computers. Apple hardware IS fairly generic, so by your logic, in fact, customers should be satisfied with "generic flaws."Apple don't produce generic machines, so we shouldn't be happy with generic flaws.
Scipio said:You know...this bugs me every time. There are only about <5% of customers who actually LOOK for dead or stuck pixels, and they are usually the most anal and have a very elitist attitude. I almost guarantee you Best Buy customers have no idea what a stuck pixel is, same goes for a vast majority of PC cusomters.
fatsoforgotso said:Apple don't produce generic machines, so we shouldn't be happy with generic flaws.
Cooknn said:Unfortunately I'm not sure what you can do since you bought it at the Apple store. I will only buy my Apple laptops and monitors at CompUSA so that if anything is wrong (ie. dead or stuck pixels) I can take it back within 21 days no questions asked...
matticus008 said:But if your friends scour your monitor for one broken pixel, and then question the entire build quality, they're being a little hypocritical...
And then you wouldn't be able to afford it.fatsoforgotso said:I think Apple should provide us with flawless hardware,...they should be make it their business to produce flawless machines.
You don't see one dead pixel all the time, even in the center of the screen. You certainly don't notice it when watching DVDs (if you're close enough to see individual pixels, you're close enough to see all the transfer defects of the DVD image which is far more detrimental to the experience) or flipping through photos. Push come to shove, one subpixel looks like a speck of dust. I agree that it's right in front of you, but it's immaterial. People see these things with their minds more than their eyes. If you were in that situation and shunned Apple, I'd invite you to find a company that provides you with a better experience and wish you luck. But you'd be back in no time, having discovered that no one else was any better.shrhaider said:matticus008, you didn't need to see your bumper every time you sat in your car. You don't have to stare at the scratches on your trunk or door every time you drive. OP has to stare at a stuck pixel every time he turns on his iMac, every time he sends an email, watches a DVD, looks at his digital photos. It's not the same thing at all. If it were me, it would bother me to no end. And if I bought that computer and had OP's customer service experience, I'd be tempted to never buy an Apple again, and I'd tell all my friends not to shop there either.
matticus008 said:You don't see one dead pixel all the time, even in the center of the screen.
shrhaider said:That's ridiculous. It doesn't take a "scouring" to find a broken pixel. My dad's recent Toshiba laptop purchase had a stuck red pixel near the center of the screen, and it was the first thing I noticed when I sat down.
shrhaider said:But neither would I settle for that kind of product.
shrhaider said:All in all, it's just an unfortunate situation. I feel badly for the OP, and I hope it doesn't happen to me.
shrhaider said:And I hope the OP gets his computer replaced, because photo-editing or not, this isn't like a car or a crystal glass.
Of course it bothers him! It would bother anyone when they notice small problems. That's not the point. The point is that being bothered by something isn't a guarantee that anyone else has any obligation to do anything about it or that you have a right to a new machine or a legally defensible cause for credit card chargeback. Your advice is sound, though, deal with it and get over it.Whistleway said:OP sees it and it bothers him. Deal with it and stop telling others what to see and what not to see. Buzz off !!
Whistleway said:OP sees it and it bothers him. Deal with it and stop telling others what to see and what not to see. Buzz off !!
matticus008 said:Of course it bothers him! It would bother anyone when they notice small problems. That's not the point. The point is that being bothered by something isn't a guarantee that anyone else has any obligation to do anything about it or that you have a right to a new machine or a legally defensible cause for credit card chargeback.
Scipio said:Well aren't we special.
Scipio said:Again, the OP is too fixated on the stuck pixel. He could very well go through 10 computers and have the same problem.
Scipio said:I'm bothered by my President...can I exchange him?
I'm not too sure about thattonyl said:President is not a commercial product.![]()
matticus008 said:You don't see one dead pixel all the time, even in the center of the screen. You certainly don't notice it when watching DVDs (if you're close enough to see individual pixels, you're close enough to see all the transfer defects of the DVD image which is far more detrimental to the experience) or flipping through photos. Push come to shove, one subpixel looks like a speck of dust. I agree that it's right in front of you, but it's immaterial. People see these things with their minds more than their eyes. If you were in that situation and shunned Apple, I'd invite you to find a company that provides you with a better experience and wish you luck. But you'd be back in no time, having discovered that no one else was any better.
14 days on computers, no questions asked, with open box restocking fee and BTO systems are non-refundable.StealthRider said:I was under the impression that Apple had a 30-day no questions asked return policy in-store...?