Whaha - all those returners paying "restocking fees".
Apparently those phones are sold as new again.
Apple should pay those customers "waiting line reduction fees" instead
And offer the rest "notched pixel discounts", btw
[doublepost=1511691821][/doublepost]
This is not how stock markets work. Apple stock is fairly fixed and hardly follows its mkt cap - whatever news there is. Implying that shareholders profit far less than the company itself.
Something is not working there as it should, really.
There is less risk with Apple but it does follow the market cap lately. I think it will stay around $175 until the next conference call. Everyone is waiting to see just how many iPhone X’s were purchased. If the 1-2 week wait is from making too many then it will drop quite a bit. If demand is actually high then Apple will come awfully close to the trillion dollar mark.
[doublepost=1511897874][/doublepost]
Stock price in and of itself does not indicate whether or not a company is a good value.
Anyway, supply ramped up a lot faster than I expected. Either the analysts were wrong about supply constraints or demand really isn’t as strong. Who knows. We’ll find out soon. You do have to figure that some people are turned off by the lack of a home button and by Face ID. Most people won’t bother to read up on this stuff the way people here do. I saw a couple of people over the weekend who had no interest because they couldn’t figure out how to use the phone without a home button. So it’s actualy a great thing that Apple kept the 8 and 8 Plus around.
Apple is one of the few companies where you don’t have to worry going into a conference call. As an investor of different companies, I have noticed if a company hits it out of the park then the stock goes up 5%. If it doesn’t do well then it goes down 20-25%. Apple has so much money in the stock that it takes a ton to make it drop that much in a day. That being said, there next conference call will be the most anticipated in years when we get a glimpse at how well the X has really done.
[doublepost=1511898729][/doublepost]
Yup, that's why comparing one's portfolio to indexes using standardized metrics that analyze the return relative to the risk (volatility) makes so much sense. The Sharpe ratio is a pretty standard one. More advanced models will "decompose" a portfolio's returns into parts and see what's leftover. If it's positive, then you (maybe) have some alpha. So even in an up market, the question is how you perform relative to those benchmarks on a risk-adjusted basis.
On Buffett: exactly. This is part of what I tried to explain to the guy in the other thread. He is for some strange reason convinced that Buffett doesn't do fundamental analysis, despite that being discussed in virtually every book about Buffett on the planet, including the one by Mary Buffett herself. And he's under some illusion that Buffett picked Apple because he just "liked it" and "it was cheap," which is more BS. One of my favorite Buffett quotes debunks that silliness: "It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price."
Lastly, those stocks you mentioned are certainly expensive. But that doesn't mean by corollary that Apple is "cheap." I ran a bunch of numbers on this in the other thread. Multiples such as Price to FCF, FCF/EV, EBITDA/EV, and Price to Book all put Apple in the middle of the pack among US equities. Even using PE, Apple isn't even in the top 20% of the Russell 3000.
Everything is relative. The word "cheap" implies relativity; it is meaningless without comparisons or a baseline. But no matter how you slice it, it's hard to make the case that Apple looks "cheap." Reasonable? Definitely. On the cheaper end of the spectrum? In some models, sure. Room to grow? Very possibly. "Cheap by any measure," which is what that guy laughably said repeatedly? Demonstrably false.
Perhaps you and I are just having a semantic discussion here on definitions and are in total agreeemnt. If so that's totally cool! That just wasn't what was happening with Baywatch or whatever his name is.
I agree that it is relative and that is what I like about the stock market. If any given model worked all the time then everyone would be billionaires. I thought Amazon was too expensive around $600 and I have lost out on 100% returns. I thought NFLX was too back when they changed the names of the different services and their stock cratered. I didn’t think people would forget as quickly as they did and the stock would skyrocket ever since.
I thought the market as a whole was too expensive and I thought the presidential race would bring it back to earth. That didn’t happen either. Eventually, I decided I didn’t like seeing it go up while being out of the market and got back in and have made about 40% so far.
I believe Apple is cheap and they still have room to grow with the stock price. You will want to wait until the next conference call though. That will show the future and how well the X has done. Personally, I really like the phone and don’t mind the swiping up. It wasn’t hard to get used to. I don’t mind the notch either. It beats having a top bezel like the S8.
Last edited: