You really do hate freedom don’t you?Okay, video games are now illegal. Problem solved.
You really do hate freedom don’t you?Okay, video games are now illegal. Problem solved.
My guess....regardless of my stance on this.....is you have no kids.Are you kidding? You’re okay with letting the government mold your kids for 13 years, but restricting video games is where you draw the line?
Good Lord.
I'm not comparing now vs 1980s.
Video games weren't nearly as common in the early 2000s vs now. Yet there wasn't much of an increase. The biggest increase was in the decades leading up to 2000.National Obesity Monitor - State of Childhood Obesity
stateofchildhoodobesity.org
Lots of things were happening then. More people eating out, more fast food, even changes in demographics.
This doesn’t seem to really affect parental control all that much tbh. If a parent really wanted to let their child play they can just play from the parent’s account. This just sets the default for most under age players and only for always connected online game platforms.That may be, and if that’s the case, good for them. As a US citizen no chance I’d let the Government intervene in what I think is a parental decision that I ultimately do have control over.
You really do hate freedom don’t you?
Actually, if you spend 10 years researching and thinking about this exact question, you will realize that there is nothing natural about electoral democracy. It’s artificially created through revolution and only existed for only a tiny blip of human society.That doesn't even make any sense. There's nothing natural about dictatorship.
Oh, and about 1 Apple CEO thing 🤣 you do know that Apple isn't a government right? You DO know the difference between the two? Jesus, the way people bent out of shape to defend autocrats. It's almost like they deserve it.
It’s indisputable that kids today are far less active than kids 30 years ago. Indisputable.
Limiting people from voting illegally. You know, in all 50 states, you can vote with nothing but a first and last name if you answer "no address" and "no SSN." So far I've also seen that you can do that by mail.Limiting people from spreading a deadly disease is bad in your mind but limiting peoples ability to vote is good? You have a very weird sense of priorities, but then those who favor dictatorships often are willing to let others die so it makes sense.
Ok but they aren’t, so in fantasy land they are solved but not real life.Okay, video games are now illegal. Problem solved.
Limiting people from spreading a deadly disease is bad in your mind but limiting peoples ability to vote is good? You have a very weird sense of priorities, but then those who favor dictatorships often are willing to let others die so it makes sense.
Oh, I like freedom, so long as it’s productive for the nation, the community, and the people around you.LOL, well we know you don’t understand how antibiotics work AND you also seem to be against freedom. At least we are clear on that.
Yeah, but the greater effect is that the Chinese govt will require more backdoors into game companies to know if any kids are playing too long. Which I'll bet is the real intent here. Just like Apple's CSAM detection, "think of the children" is a good-sounding excuse.This doesn’t seem to really affect parental control all that much tbh. If a parent really wanted to let their child play they can just play from the parent’s account. This just sets the default for most under age players and only for always connected online game platforms.
The freedom for self-destruction is hardly desirable.You really do hate freedom don’t you?
3 hours of educational games is enough perhapsThat's really bad and stupid. Games are not only entertainment. There are educational games too. Simplistic view from a totalitarian government.
I’m not disputing that. But that doesn’t change that this type of thing would do little for obesity rates. You can take away every single thing that would keep a kid from sitting at home but if their diet is poor, and most obese children’s diets are, it won’t do a thing for them. You cannot ever outwork a bad diet, and that is Indisputable.
Ok but they aren’t, so in fantasy land they are solved but not real life.
This sentence is contradictory. Legality isn’t an opinion but rather the government’s rules on what is or is not allowed in its jurisdiction. If legality is factored in then by definition the government already has a say in what your children do in your home.The Govt should have zero way in what my children do in my home as long as its legal.
Water can lift a boat, or it can fold it in.You're in a dream land if you think Chinese people can revolt, successfully.
The chart says it. It went from 13.9% to 18.5% during those years. In 1980, it was 5.5%. Video games didn't really explode in popularity until 2009 or so.Huh? Your own source says this: “According to NHANES, there was a significant increasing trend in youth obesity rates from 1999–2000 to 2015–2016.”
Actually, kids outran bad diets for a long time. Kids can eat a lot of garbage if they’re running around in the sun all afternoon and evening, like they did before video games.
You are not born in China is kind of unfortunate imo.Because most parents simply wouldn’t otherwise, or they are constantly out-smarted by their kids. If the problem is solved from the provider-end, it solves the problem for all parents.
If children are addicted to video games in epidemic proportions, then it’s a national security problem because you simply wouldn’t have heathy, well-socialized and masculine men to be soldiers.
How does this need more back doors? The new rules require real name verification on online game accounts, which in practice would do away with the need for deeper monitoring to figure out who is and isn’t a child. The government probably also already has access to the play time data, given that players for years at this point.Yeah, but the greater effect is that the Chinese govt will require more backdoors into game companies to know if any kids are playing too long. Which I'll bet is the real intent here. Just like Apple's CSAM detection, "think of the children" is a good-sounding excuse.
The chart says it. It went from 13.9% to 18.5% during those years. In 1980, it was 5.5%. Video games didn't really explode in popularity until 2009 or so.
You seem to forget that each successive Chinese regime and dynasty throughout history has been created through successful revolts.You're in a dream land if you think Chinese people can revolt, successfully.
This sentence is contradictory. Legality isn’t an opinion but rather the government’s rules on what is or is not allowed in its jurisdiction. If legality is factored in then by definition the government already has a say in what your children do in your home.