Well that one's easy for me: IF iPhone Air DOES NOT have ultra wide camera THEN Pro Max.Foldable iPhone, iPhone Air, iPhone Pro… how we meant to choose which one?
Well that one's easy for me: IF iPhone Air DOES NOT have ultra wide camera THEN Pro Max.Foldable iPhone, iPhone Air, iPhone Pro… how we meant to choose which one?
Even a flip style device wouldn’t replace a 13 Mini (it will be way too thick). I don’t know why people keep speaking about “Mac Studio territory”: we are speaking about two totally different devices.I was hoping for a flip-style device that could replace the 13 mini. But book-style means that when it's folded it most likely will be just as large as other current Apple offerings. And at that price point (into Mac Studio territory), I couldn't justify it. I guess I'll have to wait until an Apple Watch becomes more independent of the iPhone. Then I'd have a small communication device and use my iPad for games, email and the like.
A galaxy Fold 5 was €2000 in Europe (an iPhone 16 Pro Max is about €1400).Which ones are $2000?
It isn’t like sandwiching two phones but it also isn’t just a bigger display: it is way more complex than that, because there are an hinge and a foldable display.This type of display is over 5 years old and no one made it right so far. Not sure if Apple can do any better.You're not sandwiching two phones together. It's just a bigger display. This isn't like fusing two m-chips together. You also seem to forget at this point, this type of device is over 6 years old. Is any other folding phone two phone fused together? Nope.
Just like I cannot justify Fold 4 and Fold 5 prices…Having owned a Z Flip 4 and spent time playing with a Fold 5 I'm curious what Apple will bring to the table. But I'm afraid I won't be able to justify the price.
I strongly suspect it will costs more than $2000…If it’s close to $2000, I’ll be getting one. The only thing I that keeps me from using my Pixel 9 Pro Fold as my daily driver is the fact that it doesn’t run iOS. Otherwise, it’s a great device I use daily
I had REAL WOLRD experience with a foldable (Fold 5) and the crease is there, undeniably there, and i cannot stand it. Never.Those that actually own foldables and use them everyday will attest to the crease being the lowest priority. Apple should focus on:
Software
Thinness
Weight
Camera quality
IP rating for dust/sand
Apple Pencil support
Durability
Battery life
Nail down all those other design challenges before worrying about minimal crease.
People that complain about the crease typically lack any real-world experience with a foldable (as opposed to a flip phone). People imagine they'll feel the crease every time they swipe or scroll because they're used to how their thumb or finger slides across the middle of a narrow slab phone. What they fail to realize, due to lack of first-hand experience, is the wider inner screen of a foldable makes it difficult to reach the middle where the crease is. In reality, with two-handed use your thumbs are scrolling along the outer third of the large display and rarely encounters the crease. That is why so few foldable owners actually complain about the crease. And when watching content on the glorious, large display, the crease is literally invisible. The crease is there if people want to fixate on it but that's like going for a run and realizing your socks are mismatched -- it's not a big deal.
Sure i think a lot of apple shareholders are considering Tim Cook mediocre and they’ll be eager to have someone smart like you as a CEO instead.Even if it has Touch ID, I wouldn't be surprised if it still has a notch or Dynamic Notchland. The entire current MacBook line has Touch ID, but every one of those models has a notch. Tim Cook is clueless and mediocre, so he probably doesn't see the ridiculousness of a device having both Touch ID and a notch.
Very curious to see one on a real phone before judging. But if you look at the article, the crease is still very visible on the new panel. It is just less prominent than the one on the Fold 6. For me is still a no-go.Samsung might have solved it. And Apple is preparing to use Samsung panels, if I remember correctly.
![]()
Samsung may finally bring this much-needed upgrade to the Galaxy Z Fold 7
Samsung demoed a creaseless foldable panel at MWC 2025, and it is likely debuting with the Galaxy Z Fold 7.www.androidcentral.com
Sooner or later they’ll learn. We must keep voting with our wallet.Did they not learn with the Apple Vision Pro that people are bit done with paying stupid prices for little benefit?
Multiwindows already is in iPadOS , so I think it will be easily extended to iOS.I predict the complaints will be the lack of software features for multitasking/ multi-windows.
The lack of Face-ID is a show stopper for me, unless the side ID button can be shown to be just as effective (or better) than Face-ID. The extra price could be mitigated if a foldable iPhone works well enough to replace my iPad too.
Apple's first foldable iPhone should arrive around the end of 2026 or early 2027 with a book-style design and a premium price tag of over $2,000, according to analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. In a report today, Kuo outlines his expectations for the device, noting that it will have an approximately 7.8-inch "crease-free" inner display and a 5.5-inch outer display, matching a rumor from last month.
![]()
Kuo says that the foldable iPhone will measure between 9 and 9.5 mm when folded, and around 4.5 to 4.8 mm when unfolded. It will feature a titanium alloy casing with a hinge made of stainless steel and titanium alloy, and it will have a dual-lens rear camera with a front-facing camera for both folded and unfolded states.
Notably, Kuo says that the phone will forgo Face ID authentication, instead using a Touch ID side button as a means to save precious internal space. It will also be positioned as a "true AI-driven phone," with the larger screens allowing for a better multi-tasking AI experience.
With premium pricing above $2,000 and perhaps even above $2,500, Kuo believes the foldable iPhone will tap into Apple's loyal fanbase, some of whom will view it as a "must-have device" if its quality meets expectations.
Kuo says Apple is aiming to finalize the specs of its first foldable iPhone during the second quarter of this year and officially kick off the project in the third quarter. Mass production is reportedly planned for the fourth quarter of 2026, so we could perhaps see a launch late next year or in early 2027. A second-generation model is said to be in the pipeline for a year later.
Article Link: Kuo: Apple's First Foldable iPhone to Feature Book-Style Design, Sell for Over $2,000
Coming late does not imply there are no innovations…Apple is introducing a foldable iPhone in 2027, relying on a tired concept that has been widely available in the market since 2019. Now that’s innovative!
Precisely, it was his pattern. Judging from your nickname, we are the same age and both addicts, so we know a few things… 😉Honestly, if Jobs hadn't died, we'd have seen all the same things most likely. We probably would have had touch screen macs 10 years ago that still do not exist. If Jobs said Apple would never do something or wasn't looking to, you knew in 2 years it would arrive. He just never wanted anyone knowing what they were working on.
What problem Apple is trying to solve here? Just want to enter the foldable phone market for namesake.
Like any foldable so far, they are a solution in search for a problem….What problem Apple is trying to solve here? Just want to enter the foldable phone market for namesake.
Also a flip style won’t be really pocket friendly, because the thickness is way more than any modern smartphone.I love my MB Air, but rarely use it, as my iPad Pro does nearly everything from banking to writing to viewing fotos and videos. And I can lug the iPad around, if I have to do so.
I need a phone for portability. A flip style that I can put in any pocket — like the iPhone5/Gen 1 SE/12/13/mini.
Bookstyle, foldable ipad device…nope, too big for the pocket. Will wait longer for the flip style device, I guess. Cooke never listens to me, despite the bribes I pay.
Like any foldable so far, they are a solution in search for a problem….
Samsung Flip mobiles are really solving the problem of having smaller foot prints in your pocket. Though it must have retained the same performance, spec, especially the camera ones. Otherwise, they are not as bad as they think it is. But Samsung Fold is bit expensive though it lacks the camera performance of S25 Ultra.The problem they solve should be easy for anyone to see, I can’t fit my iPad Mini in my pocket. The same way the first iPhone was made so you didn’t have to bring multiple devices with you to achieve certain tasks a foldable phone can do the same.
I’d love to be able to read my ebooks on the go or during a break at the office without having to bring a bag for my iPad Mini.
You couldn’t be more wrong.It’s not Apple concerns to police how people use their device within a return window.
It’s potentially great publicity more than anything expected by early adopters.
Forgot about me or what I think: What benefit would it be for Apple to add the overhead of blocking returns in the matter being proposed?You couldn’t be more wrong.
Except a foldable phone is not a great phone nor a great tablet, so you are not really solving any problem but you are settling down for a mediocre solution for both tasks, at a very expensive price.The problem they solve should be easy for anyone to see, I can’t fit my iPad Mini in my pocket. The same way the first iPhone was made so you didn’t have to bring multiple devices with you to achieve certain tasks a foldable phone can do the same.
I’d love to be able to read my ebooks on the go or during a break at the office without having to bring a bag for my iPad Mini.
Actually NOT. Samsung Flip compared to an iPhone 16 Pro, for instance, is bigger in TWO dimensions out of three. Smaller footprint ? It is 14.9 mm thick, almost double iPhone thickness, so it is definitely noticeable in your pocket.Samsung Flip mobiles are really solving the problem of having smaller foot prints in your pocket. Though it must have retained the same performance, spec, especially the camera ones. Otherwise, they are not as bad as they think it is. But Samsung Fold is bit expensive though it lacks the camera performance of S25 Ultra.
Except a foldable phone is not a great phone nor a great tablet, so you are not really solving any problem but you are settling down for a mediocre solution for both tasks, at a very expensive price.
Yes the ebook case is one of the few tasks a foldable phone (like a Fold NOT a flip) can do better than a traditional one, if you are not considering the crease which is disturbing me so much. Not much for the asking price and the drawbacks (durability, crease, etc.).
ExactlyThe problem they solve should be easy for anyone to see, I can’t fit my iPad Mini in my pocket. The same way the first iPhone was made so you didn’t have to bring multiple devices with you to achieve certain tasks a foldable phone can do the same.
I’d love to be able to read my ebooks on the go or during a break at the office without having to bring a bag for my iPad Mini.
That’s simply falseExcept a foldable phone is not a great phone nor a great tablet, so you are not really solving any problem but you are settling down for a mediocre solution for both tasks, at a very expensive price.
Yes the ebook case is one of the few tasks a foldable phone (like a Fold NOT a flip) can do better than a traditional one, if you are not considering the crease which is disturbing me so much. Not much for the asking price and the drawbacks (durability, crease, etc.).
They should’ve blocked returns for the Vision Pro, but they didn’t.Forgot about me or what I think: What benefit would it be for Apple to add the overhead of blocking returns in the matter being proposed?
What Apple has to gain blocking returns for this device different than all their other mobile devices?
What’s there to gain dealing with the forced exceptions of such a policy in many countries?