Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple usb-c requiring an IC chip certification is more than a vague rumor at this point
EU regulations will not allow it to require a chip...so yes it's a vague rumor getting people all riled up. And riled up people click on links...generating revenue. Apple has had MFI chips since the iPod, and non-MFI stuff has worked fine. So yes, this is just click bait meant to agitate people.
 
Apple usb-c requiring an IC chip certification is more than a vague rumor at this point
No it’s not. Or are you talking about Click-Bait Kuo as the source of irrefutable evidence? 🤣🤣

Seriously though. What non vague rumour are you referring to. Surely nothing in this thread.

At worst, Apple will have a certified cable that they will ensure runs at FULL capability. Many Amazon cables don’t. Buy at your own peril.
 
Might as well do this: users who subscribe to icloud+ can unlock the fast charging function
 
Definitely there will be a huge increase in sale of power adapters. Lack of charger in the box helps Apple bring in lots of $.
The MFI chip would be in the cable, not the power adapter, and guess which of those things your iPhone comes with. This is just a clickbait rumor meant to agitate people.
 
Last edited:
I feel like we are pretty much in the same ballpark on this one. But the thing is, the point you are making at the end isn't linked to crippling features. Apple could enforce MFi on top of USB-C and have the typical warning we have using non-certified lightning cables without degrading the performance and features of non-certified USB-C charges and cables.

If Apple feels the need to spend money on having charges and cables MFi certified on top of the required USB-PD certification isn't all that bad for consumers or the environment. But starting to artificially limit non-certified chargers and cables that already comply with USB-PD doesn't make much sense. That would just be a ploy to push users with chargers and cables perfectly capable of supporting up to 100W charging using USB-PD into getting new MFi-certified chargers and cables just to achieve the same thing their current chargers and cables are already rated and certified for.

And this opens pandora's box. Suddenly, Samsung will start with its own set of certifications, Lenovo with its own etc. And no one will pay for a cross-manufacture certificate, so your Apple charger will be crippled when connected to anything non-Apple, and your Samsung charger will be crippled when connected to your Apple devices as a result of Samsung not paying for the MFi certification.


If manufactures want to add cost to their chargers and cable to warn users when they connect non-certified chargers and cables, so be it. But there is no need to cripple the existing USB-PD standard by artificially limiting the charging speeds.
I guess it would just remain to be seen if MFi is used to help consumers or cripple them. In a perfect world, they would just embrace USB-PD and say "make sure you use one of those"
 
I guess it would just remain to be seen if MFi is used to help consumers or cripple them. In a perfect world, they would just embrace USB-PD and say "make sure you use one of those"
Excepting to say that doesn’t address bandwidth.

The biggest problem with this entire mess is that anyone can call anything a USB-C if it has the connectors.

You can’t even call a USB-C cable "USB-C PD v3.1". Because USB has a standard of 3.1 (for 5 Gbps) And USB-C PD also has a 3.1 version (the current one). You just don’t know what you’re getting. They need a naming standard for USB-C that address both Bandwidth and Power Delivery.

USB-C is great, but the consumer who wants to charge their phone, laptop, or wants to download their video files can’t easily see what they are buying. If Apple were to have MFi, it would have a specification that is known, and that makes it worthwhile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
They have been using USB-C now on the rest of their devices for several years; there's no reason for them to do things any differently on the iPhone.
There is: Money. They’re selling more iPhones than any other product.
And iPhones have the smallest batteries and are most often charged.

And EU give nothing about it 🥲
Quite the contrary: they’ve mandated a common charging protocol that devices must support (at a minimum).
Apple has been forced into this corner by the EU. The EU doesn’t care if Joe Schmo uses a $2 cable that won’t adequately support his iPhone 15. Apple does care, and they have to walk this tightrope of following the law but not allowing junk to ruin their experience.
There’s no problem with making USB-C compliant charging cables for $2.
It‘s not 2016 Benson Leung time anymore - and Apple’s cables aren’t made of magical stardust either.
You just need to adhere to the USB-C standard.

This is going to be another case of the EU making things worse because their tech people aren’t half as smart as everyone else’s tech people.
A myriad of proprietary charging standards hasn‘t made and isn’t making things better.
This is just plain bashing of the EU and politicians/legislators that lacks a rational argument.

If EU was worried about environment, they should have forced apple to include charger with iPhones sold in EU.
This makes no sense at all. Forcing Apple to ship and customers to buy more chargers when the already have some does nothing good for the environment. Especially when chargers are used for 5 or 10 years by many people: longer than the lifespan of their phones.

The EU is in fact preparing to mandate unbundling of chargers from device sales (i.e. tell manufscturers that they have to give consumers the option to buy without a charger).

If Apple decides to restrict charging speeds while using non MFI cables, the whole point in EU’s law becomes worthless. iPhone is one of the slowest in charging speeds and they are making it even slower to force customer to buy MFI chargers and cables
USB PD is quite usable and useful. Not worthless.
And if anyone’s making any charging slower, it‘s greedy Apple.

The biggest problem with this entire mess is that anyone can call anything a USB-C if it has the connectors.

(…)

USB-C is great, but the consumer who wants to charge their phone, laptop, or wants to download their video files can’t easily see what they are buying. If Apple were to have MFi, it would have a specification that is known, and that makes it worthwhile.
Yeah, who else could clear up that entire mess (of USB-C specs) for consumers if not a company like Apple?

1679530748672.jpeg
 
Excepting to say that doesn’t address bandwidth.

The biggest problem with this entire mess is that anyone can call anything a USB-C if it has the connectors.

You can’t even call a USB-C cable "USB-C PD v3.1". Because USB has a standard of 3.1 (for 5 Gbps) And USB-C PD also has a 3.1 version (the current one). You just don’t know what you’re getting. They need a naming standard for USB-C that address both Bandwidth and Power Delivery.

USB-C is great, but the consumer who wants to charge their phone, laptop, or wants to download their video files can’t easily see what they are buying. If Apple were to have MFi, it would have a specification that is known, and that makes it worthwhile.
I legitimately believe that the folks at USBIF that come up with the naming standards go to a hotel and drop acid before they name things. The naming conventions could have been so easy. They either deliberately turned it into an absurd mess or were tripping balls when they wrote them.
 
Apple‘s MFi is just ridiculous at this moment. Are current Apple (MacBook, iPad) USB-C chargers even MFi certified? Does this mean I can’t fully utilize my current Apple USB-C chargers?

Just stop milking this cow already and give us standardized USB-PD.

Also this whole “We care about environment“ is clearly nonsense.
While I fully agree that this is Apple nonsense with the MFi cable and charging block/accessories program is based on greed, I disagree 50% of the environment crap statement.

Most people that draw this will point to Android phones. Even Flossy’s channel continues on every unboxing video stating “charger in the box, pay attention Apple and Samsung”. Yet these phones seem to more than likely have a USB-A port on the block!! To me that’s stupid and defeats the purpose of having usb-c end to end cable. THAT is a waste cause it’ll be tossed out.

If you haven’t notice the increase of really bizarre storm, floods, rising of water levels and most importantly average yearly temperatures … then don’t worry it’ll not affect you until you’re 90, but your offspring and their children will default feel the impact daily!

Don’t think Elysium in space is ready to be the solution lol.
 
The duality of the macrumors user.

As a consumer and a person who cares somewhat for the environment, I weep for this change.

As a shareholder, I cheer this change.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: AppliedMicro
I’m guessing a lot of people here mistakenly think MFi is just to allow people to add a cable to an iPhone. It is not. Notwithstanding, I also understand a lot of people just like to hate on Apple for everything, so there is that.

MFi certification is far far more and includes the integration with the actual ecosystem.

It includes:
  • AirPlay audio
  • Car Keys
  • CarPlay
  • Find My network
  • GymKit
  • HomeKit
  • iPod Accessory Protocol (iAP)
  • MFi Game Controller
  • MFi Hearing Aid
  • Wi-Fi Accessory Configuration (WAC)
 
I really hope that the iPhone 15 Pro at least comes with USB 4 if not Thunderbolt. Transferring video files from FilmicPro is the biggest ⚽️ ache around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: steve09090
I’m guessing a lot of people here mistakenly think MFi is just to allow people to add a cable to an iPhone. It is not. Notwithstanding, I also understand a lot of people just like to hate on Apple for everything, so there is that.

MFi certification is far far more and includes the integration with the actual ecosystem.

It includes:
  • AirPlay audio
  • Car Keys
  • CarPlay
  • Find My network
  • GymKit
  • HomeKit
  • iPod Accessory Protocol (iAP)
  • MFi Game Controller
  • MFi Hearing Aid
  • Wi-Fi Accessory Configuration (WAC)
Imagine the chaos of Apple didn’t do these sorts of things. Given there is already a mass market for dodgy chargers and cables that cause consumers harm Apple actually manages to provide a method where we as consumers can be confident the charger we buy isn’t going to explode.
 
Imagine the chaos of Apple didn’t do these sorts of things. Given there is already a mass market for dodgy chargers and cables that cause consumers harm Apple actually manages to provide a method where we as consumers can be confident the charger we buy isn’t going to explode.
…cause nobody in the world would ever manufacture fake Apple chargers (and cables). And sell them on Amazon!? They‘ll even print an MFi logo on the box.

MFi certification doesn’t stop dodgy chargers from being made, sold and bought (or exploding). Neither does it stop them from working with - higher-powered! - Apple devices like iPads and MacBooks.
 
…cause nobody in the world would ever manufacture fake Apple chargers (and cables). And sell them on Amazon!? They‘ll even print an MFi logo on the box.

MFi certification doesn’t stop dodgy chargers from being made, sold and bought (or exploding). Neither does it stop them from working with - higher-powered! - Apple devices like iPads and MacBooks.
You’ve hit on a really good point.

Apple haven’t stopped you using these devices (any more) but you’ll be notified if it isn’t MFi. You can’t blame Apple or MFi for fraud, but Apple have developed a way so that you know you don’t have an MFi device.

I notice Samsung has a message on their website saying there have been counterfeit Samsung products and telling people they shouldn’t buy them. I guess they fixed that problem. Samsung's response to fake products
 
I’m 1,000,000% behind this. It’s certainly a great way to say “screw you” to the European regulators.

I think Apple should go even further make it so iPads require it as well. My only question is, is it at all possible to implement this retroactively, either in software or hardware?
 
I’m 1,000,000% behind this.
Why though?
Just supporting corporate greed as a shareholder?

Whether you like or agree with EU regulation and the requirement for a USB-C port as a charging port is one thing. But actively crippling such standardised ports in software or with proprietary markers or software would just be an anti-consumer/anti-user move on Apple’s part.
 
Last edited:
Every time you plug your device in the screen could have a pop up with some info: charging watts, estimated time until full. When moving data you can check the data rate. The pop up could also specify that it is an MFI cable and adapter, or not.

To comply with European law the devices should theoretically all work regardless, as well as possible. But at least we can know if the peripherals we are using are MFI certified, and therefore not potential junk.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.