Because then you don't need to have to carry a cable with you (when using the Pencil with the iPad). There are pros and cons for either option, but to say that you cannot see the reasons for the current solution is playing blind.
i feel Apple made a switch to lightening at a wrong time. And now they are stuck with it on iPhones as another switch to usb c would be too soon. damn. would have loved USBc across the board
I’m looking for an iMac too, but I don’t want to buy one with a 2+ years old cpu.
A 6 core CPU, 16 GB standard RAM and a base configuration with SSD would be more than enough for me to immediately order one.
An anniversary redesign would be great too, but only if it solves thermal issues.
Not a chance in hell Apple replaces Lightning on the iPad. It doesn't make sense: if I were traveling with all updated Apple products I would need a Lightning cable for my iPhone and a USB-C cable for my iPad. Why?!
[doublepost=1536590037][/doublepost]
Don't forget all the Apple accessories have Lightning ports: Magic Mouse/Keyboard, AirPods, Beats, etc. It makes no sense to switch the iPad to USB-C.
Well, not to doubt a stranger on the internet ;-) but, I read article after article talking about how there is no consensus on how USB-C audio is to be implemented over USB-C. So this is the documented, officially adopted standard that is utilized consistently throughout the industry? Or is it competing standards that haven't been adopted by everyone and applied differently by different manufacturers, and not fully compatible with each other?
It is rather ridiculous, isn't it? Is there anyone in charge of product design and development at Apple anymore?If ipad gets USB-C, how will the apple pencil be charged? Another dongle?
Dongles wouldn't have been a problem for the pencil if the transition to USB-C had been completed in 2016. In any case, I bought a pencil. Still haven't found a compelling need to use it. Steve was right. My finger still works better than any stylus that I have to keep track of and keep charged, whether it requires a dongle or not.I will not be purchasing another iPhone that still makes use of the Lightning interface, no matter how much longer Apple tells me, a costumer, that I am wrong.
[doublepost=1536639731][/doublepost]
It is rather ridiculous, isn't it? Is there anyone in charge of product design and development at Apple anymore?
Well it's been 6 years since the switch to the lightning cable. That's a longer life than the original 30-pin cable, and they wouldn't be abandoning it yet, just switching a higher power / more computer like device to USB-C.
Where would we be without Ming?
Great, no bundled fast charger on new iPhones.
Should, at the very least, be bundled with the OLED iPhones.
Again, the wording is somewhat ambiguous, so it's unclear if Kuo means the 12-inch MacBook will be refreshed, or if it will be entirely replaced.
USB-C ipad pros. Cool.
Where would we be without Ming?
anyone else wondering if USB-C in new iPad pros means a new Apple Pencil? because they really push fast charging that pencil through the iPad, but that won't be possible anymore... (not that it was good design to begin with, but carrying that little lighting adaptor is a hassle)
Well it's been 6 years since the switch to the lightning cable. That's a longer life than the original 30-pin cable, and they wouldn't be abandoning it yet, just switching a higher power / more computer like device to USB-C. I wouldn't be surprised if they migrated devices that transmit data to USB-C, and kept charge-only or input devices (Apple Remote, Pencil, Airpods) on Lightning indefinitely.
Pretty much every other flapship phone includes a fast charger. A 5W charger on the 6.5 phone will probably take 6 hours to fully charge which is hardly ideal. Also most customers probably wouldn't care if including a fast charger costs Apple a few cents more per phone.Why? = More expensive for Apple & will not make a difference to the purchase decision. Very smart move by Apple.
Surprised, during Apple keynotes.
Afraid you are wrong on that one.As someone who wears a continuous glucose monitor, I can tell you, we will not have non-invasive continuous glucose monitors (CGM) anytime soon. The technology for a CGM has just recently become good enough to use reliably. These reliable models are all invasive. Optical CGMs are a LONG way away. I wish I were wrong, but I just don't see this happening on a watch before the end of the decade.
The 30-pin connector came out in 2003, it was used in iPods well before iPhone was ever introduced.Well it's been 6 years since the switch to the lightning cable. That's a longer life than the original 30-pin cable, and they wouldn't be abandoning it yet, just switching a higher power / more computer like device to USB-C. I wouldn't be surprised if they migrated devices that transmit data to USB-C, and kept charge-only or input devices (Apple Remote, Pencil, Airpods) on Lightning indefinitely.
Well it's been 6 years since the switch to the lightning cable. That's a longer life than the original 30-pin cable, and they wouldn't be abandoning it yet, just switching a higher power / more computer like device to USB-C. I wouldn't be surprised if they migrated devices that transmit data to USB-C, and kept charge-only or input devices (Apple Remote, Pencil, Airpods) on Lightning indefinitely.