Reminds me of the “ARTPOP” Lady Gaga. Here for it. The video is nice, obviously it’s not very high budget, but is not bad by any means. She should’ve released that for the summer tho.
“Shot with Filmic Pro. Additional hardware used.”
It’s very cool! But... it’s not what they’re trying to make it seem like lol.
What a terrible, terrible post 😂I could tell you how the shoot was but...NDA. Sorry.
Maybe just keep a bigger camera "for the looks". I remember a guy in a music recording studio basically keeping his mixing desk for this purpose. He did everything in the box, but clients felt it didn't look like a real studio. So he brought his old desk back in and basically used it as an expensive monitor controller and to have some motor faders visible.I'm sure my clients will be very impressed when i show up at a profesisonal shoot with just my iPhone.![]()
That's the only thing that gets me about this. I mean sure, you're making use of the the iPhone's sensor(s) and some of the image pipeline... but you aren't likely to get results like this out of the box. Granted, I have Filmic Pro and I could get what were likely Moment's (or maybe Moondog Labs') lenses and/or filters, but it's a little misleading.
The operative words here are "old time filmmakers". The next generation of filmmakers won't have the same nostalgia for grain and artifacts.Many old time filmmakers have a distaste of digital because the crisper images, better color and higher frame rates distract and are less immersive. It starts looking too real, which is distracting.
Some filmmakers even add grain and other artifacts to digital media to make it look more “cinematic”
And this music video here is EXACTLY the reason why. Without the inherent dreamyness of film, everybody dancing around in the video look silly as hell.
I think you are right. I can tell when a new movie is shot on film since i have gotten used to digital media. To me film looks too soft and the colors too muted for my tastes.The operative words here are "old time filmmakers". The next generation of filmmakers won't have the same nostalgia for grain and artifacts.
how do you judge a camera‘s bitrate on a highly compressed video? you‘re looking at the compression‘s bitrate. it‘s like judging the quality of a surface from a photograph of it.the bitrate makes it pretty obvious it was shot with a phone
Its not about the app (there is an IAP too), its the comment "Additional hardware used". Whats its cost - $/€/£10/100/1000/10000+?Post about a pop star in Macrumors, the comments should be a riot by morning.
[automerge]1582873092[/automerge]
I mean, it was still shot on iPhone. Filmic Pro is a $15 app anyone can buy.
ExactlyWell... the iPhone wasn't the bottleneck in this clip...
the bitrate makes it pretty obvious it was shot with a phone
Further to what macdrej pointed out, Filmic Pro "offers up to 140Mbps encoding at 4K on latest gen devices".
There also seems to be a lot of fragile masculinity and general must-hate-everything on display in this thread, lol.