Totally understandable.I’m looking forward to a redesigned large iMac, but I also probably would’ve pulled the trigger if they had done what they did with the Air, and just put an M1 chip in the old body.
My 2014 27" iMac was really begging to be replaced so I got one of the new 24" ones. It's beautiful, and much faster, and fits more nicely on a desk -- but the jump down in screen size is noticable, and the speakers are nowhere near as good. If I'd had the choice of an M1 version of the old 5K design, I might well have chosen it instead.
The iMac was updated this year to M1 and a new form factor. The transition began in November 2020, when the first M1 Macs were released, not in June at WWDC 2020. We’re not even half way through at this point. I’m sure Tim Cook is aware of everything that is going on at Apple and I am sure he wants this to go faster than it is right now. The faster the transition, the faster the pace of users upgrading and the sooner they can dump Intel support for Apps and macOS. Bet a lot of users here are hoping for longer Intel support.If this large iMac gets delayed and doesnt get released this year, then it's simply unacceptable. Tim Cook promised a two year transition and more than a year in, we've only just got one damn M1 chip and much of the Mac lineup is still waiting to be updated to Apple Silicon. To think that the iMac, which was iconic and symbolises the Mac spirit, will take so long for an update....
And not to mention that the Intel version with 10th gen Intel is just getting so old
It's not that hard to simply scale the current 24" up to 32" and introduce some more premium features to it (like 6K screen, even better speakers etc).
We’re living in a world where car dealers are charging $38,000 for a Toyota Corolla with a straight face, so anything is possible at this point.If COVID-19 wasn't happening, i'm sure that the iPad Pro would've had an A-series chip, instead of the M1, the entry-level iMacs would've have an M1X SoC, and the higher-end MBPs, set to release this year, would've had an M2 SoC, instead of M1X, which are the rumors. In addition, I also think that higher-end iMacs would've been released alongside the higher-end MBPs, because both of these product lines target relatively the same sort of customer: pros and prosumers. I still think that the AS-version of the Mac Pro would be released at the end of this transition window and in 2022.
However, with COVID and the chip shortage, who knows? Maybe the Mac Pro will be delayed yet another year, and will be released "outside" of this 2 year transition window foretold by Tim Apple...
They are one and the same at this point. You’re going to get a larger iMac and it will be called the iMac Pro to differentiate it from the smaller iMac.By high end are we talking iMac Pro? Or just the 27” replacement?
How about this instead?iMac Pro - available in a space grey finish.
This seems patently obvious, looking at Apple's existing product lines.
- Low-ranked products are 'fun and colourful'.
- High-ranked products are 'sombre and serious'.
I'm thinking the same.Ok, maybe time to bite the bullet and buy an M1 iMac, they are already looking pretty nice.
Price is likely to start at $2499 just as the first Retina iMac cost when it was released in 2014. That 32” display will be worth it, but won’t come cheap.The only thing that is pushing me from purchasing an iMac is the screen size and GPU performance. 27 inch and 10 teraflops, and we have a deal (and not charging me 2000$+ for the machine please).
How about this instead?
- Consumer-ranked products are fun and colorful
- Professional-ranked products are somber and serious.
My M1 MacBook Pro is faster than my Core i9 iMac in everything but Metal, so I don’t consider it low-ranked in the slightest.
The M1 Macs are sort of transition computers and occupy a bit of limbo, but they are clearly the “low-ranked” products based on their price points and product category. I merely disagreed with his naming/labeling. Perhaps, I’m being overly sensitive.I don't consider your M1 Macbook pro to be fun or colorful. I think you misread the thing you disagreed with, before pretty much saying the exact same thing. 😅
What makes you think they can use the same panel? And why do you think they would use the panel from a 4999 display for a 1799 iMac?Why would they do it like this? They'll go for 6K and use the same panel as XDR without the fancy stuff. That way they reduce the price overall and all will be more profitable for them.
I think it's more likely that they will use a 6K 32" panel, size-wise similar to Pro Display XDR, but they will cut down on its more premium features, such as HDR intensity and color modes to drive the cost down to fit the larger iMac.
To have 5,5k and 6K screens in the portfolio sounds a bit redundant. I would wager they'll utilize economies of scale, and streamline it with 6K screens, just slightly less pro for the iMac.
Alright boss. I guess you'll not accept it.If this large iMac gets delayed and doesnt get released this year, then it's simply unacceptable. Tim Cook promised a two year transition and more than a year in, we've only just got one damn M1 chip and much of the Mac lineup is still waiting to be updated to Apple Silicon. To think that the iMac, which was iconic and symbolises the Mac spirit, will take so long for an update....
And not to mention that the Intel version with 10th gen Intel is just getting so old
It's not that hard to simply scale the current 24" up to 32" and introduce some more premium features to it (like 6K screen, even better speakers etc).