FSF Step Out of Bounds
Honestly, on this issue, who cares what FSF thinks? While FSF likes making stirs about freedom---maybe to capture fundraising attention, but who knows?---in this case it is adding restrictions. FSF is totally out to lunch.
Don't misunderstand. I am all about free software, but I use also lots and lots of paid software I license from developers because I don't want the poor quality usability of Linux. I use a lot of open source software, including VLC, Handbrake and the most amazing
TeX typesetting system, part of which Adobe uses in its InDesign application, which I don't use. I also contribute work to open source projects. So I am not an open source detractor or freeloader. Not at all.
However, FSF has way too many people thinking it has legal knowledge. The media gives it way too much credence. FSF is not the final voice on anything, ever. If you read its logic on this, you see it is missing the point. FSF is compromised by its general position opposing the use of OSX or the iPhone. Read its homepage.
VLC for Apple mobil products is available for redistribution. That's what really annoys FSF. That Apple allows VLC on the iTunes App store does not change the native licensing of VLC. FSF is wrong on this. FSF is acting like an imperialist on this issue, thinking it is correct and attempting to force its rule on everyone else.
The problem with FSF is its political philosophy. It wants all software to be free, yet, it begs for money online. "Don't pay for software," it says, "send your money to FSF." Also, it is compromised by its general opposition to Apple selling any software. Because it lives by ideology, rather than humanity, FSF has lost its mind on this issue. Lets hope FSF gets the message and shuts up, or, removes its interest from the VLC project and slithers into a corner to suck on a free beer.