How about start posting the LCD manufacturers Codes of the LAte 08 MBP so we can try to discover what LCD panels they have?
Regards
Regards
My 2.5 new MBP is as follows Manufacture 00000610 model 00009C84
Would it be possible to list the codes along with the Manufacturer and relative qaulity?
Example:
Samsung Code: xxx quality 7/10
LG Code: xxx quality 9/10
Chi Mei Code: xxx quality 4/10
Samsung and LG are both 9~10 out of 10. They are known as the best manufacturers of notebook panels globally, hence their prevalence in almost every laptop model.
Chi mei, from my experience with HDTVs, are not nearly as good and consistent.
Honestly I don't really care about who the manufacturer of my screen is. This 15" is way better than any of the 15" screens I saw on the previous generation 15". By far the truest white, crispest color, and most evenly lit of any of them. None of the yellowing and banding problems that I saw on four of the previous generation machines. It's about comparable with the 17" hi-res, maybe better except for the resolution. Results are what matters and this hardware revision finally makes some serious improvements in the build quality and display compared to previous 15" models.
I'm a little worried that I may get stuck with a lemon because I ordered BTO and, from what I've been told, Apple stores can't swap parts because their inventory is different from that of the online store.![]()
The display is one part, Apple stores should stock them and be able to swap them out with little effort.
In my Early 2007 MBP ( CCFL not LED backlight ) after 4 displays I have finally ended up with a AUO which is quite nice. The absolute worst were the Chi-Mei models that were crappy enough to begin with before the dust got under the seals.
AUO finally went to dual CCFL's in their units making this display a good 30% brighter than my original.
I can't seem to find the work people did on the 15" MBP's in the past to link up the codes with manufacturer. The general conclusion is that the LG's are the current tops with the other in varying levels below them.
The display is one part, Apple stores should stock them and be able to swap them out with little effort.
In my Early 2007 MBP ( CCFL not LED backlight ) after 4 displays I have finally ended up with a AUO which is quite nice. The absolute worst were the Chi-Mei models that were crappy enough to begin with before the dust got under the seals.
AUO finally went to dual CCFL's in their units making this display a good 30% brighter than my original.
I can't seem to find the work people did on the 15" MBP's in the past to link up the codes with manufacturer. The general conclusion is that the LG's are the current tops with the other in varying levels below them.
How can you substantiate that claim? Have you ordered a BTO online and then repaired it at the Apple store shortly after receiving it? There was another thread on here where someone ordered the 2.8MBP BTO and was told that he had to ship it back for a replacement part. I really hope that doesn't happen to me![]()
My MBP doesn't list a code for either. What does that mean?
Samsung has always been tied at the top with LG in terms of panel quality. However, when speaking of S-IPS panels, LG seems to be the ONLY manufacturer hence the reason why they are known as the standard "high-quality" panel manufacturer. But it boils down to notebook and general consumer (not prosumer) displays, LG is NOT superior to Samsung and neither is Samsung superior to LG. Both are great, so just hope for either screens.
I agree, but... several users have been reporting that the lower end of the screen is faded/leeching, and there appears to be inconsistent reviews amongst people who know how to calibrate a screen. I'm a little worried that I may get stuck with a lemon because I ordered BTO and, from what I've been told, Apple stores can't swap parts because their inventory is different from that of the online store.![]()
It means you're looking in the wrong place (i did the exact same thing).
You have to actually click on line-13 in your color profile...it makes sense once you try it.
No screen is 100% perfect, even the most expensive desktop screens. But the quality on the new MBP is way better than the previous generation on every one I've seen including my own. I ended up returning four of the previous 15" MBPs and getting a 17" hi-res in disgust over the situation. But the new 15" is clearly way better. I wouldn't be too worried about it. It's always possible you get a bad one for any machine. Apple stores can't swap the machine if it a BTO, but they will repair it with a different screen if you complain and convince them it's not right.
Actually I agree that you could always get a bad one with anything but people are reporting numbers of the new MBP having like 50% poor quality screens in the Apple stores right now. I even went to my local store here and noticed the same thing about half of them on display were much worse than the SR ones I remembered and don't hold a candle to my current MBP or even my Dell display screens. The ones there that were nice, were exceptionally nice but it is a lottery now when you buy a MBP as to what screen you will actually get. It is a lowest bidder bin on the manufacturing floor as to what vendor supplied he screen that week which will go into your machine build.
Can you please provide some evidence for this that is not anecdotal?