Hold on, your saying that a MR editor changed the sentence to the latter? If that is the case then MR needs to explain why the post does not show 'Edited....' so viewers can see that something in the post was edited.Another example of MacRumors reporting news using a formulation that seems intentionally inflammatory (to create more debate here in the forum thread, and thus more viewers of the irritating ads interspersed with our posts?):
?
Compare (as originally posted):
Every generation of the Apple Watch has a battery swelling defect that can cause operational failures and injuries from broken screens, states a new class action lawsuit that has been filed against Apple.
With (a simple switch to the sentence construction):
A new class action lawsuit that has been filed against Apple states that "every generation of the Apple Watch has a battery swelling defect that can cause operational failures and injuries from broken screens".
You can use it as shark deterrent, use the detached screen to slice the shark lolI'd better not to swim with my apple watch...
Just make sure to slice his nose, not his teeth.You can use it as shark deterrent, use the detached screen to slice the shark lol
Without the ad revenue, the website doesn’t have the money to run, so while mildly annoying, it is a necessary evil. I don’t think that the article is written specifically to do the thing you propose it is, but I think that it is written with the target audience in mind. I don’t think it is unreasonable for a website that is based on discussion to have articles written in a manner that sparks discussion. This is not, say cnn or npr whose number 1 goal is to inform and there are also comment sections, I think the article is the start of the conversation. But I also don’t think it is necessarily “clickbait”Another example of MacRumors reporting news using a formulation that seems intentionally inflammatory (to create more debate here in the forum thread, and thus more viewers of the irritating ads interspersed with our posts?):
?
Compare (as originally posted):
Every generation of the Apple Watch has a battery swelling defect that can cause operational failures and injuries from broken screens, states a new class action lawsuit that has been filed against Apple.
With (a simple switch to the sentence construction):
A new class action lawsuit that has been filed against Apple states that "every generation of the Apple Watch has a battery swelling defect that can cause operational failures and injuries from broken screens".
Not really. Plaintiffs seeking certification of a class are required to satisfy a "numerosity" requirement before the class can be certified (among many other requirements). These guys won't be able to get very far unless they can actually demonstrate that a large number of individuals were injured by the issue alleged. They won't be able to, so they either are extremely poor attorneys or they are simply hoping for a nuisance-value settlement before the case is dismissed or the court rules that there is no class to be certified."Whether it's widespread can't be figured out by this lawsuit"
The attorneys are incentivized to figure out how widespread it is via the class-action lawsuit. The more widespread the issue, the more plaintiffs can be joined to the suit, and the larger the monetary judgment (for plaintiffs and attorneys).
A friend of mine has had the same Samsung Watch for years and I thought it was cool. Made me think of getting an Apple Watch.Go for it but make sure you share your experience here
No, no device is designed to "explode", but you can integrate an "intended beaking point" in case of...They weren't designed for that purpose. That's just how the screen is assembled. The inners are put in and then the screen it stuck on.
"Severely sliced", seriously? Can it decapitate people too?He was in a golf cart and reached down from the steering wheel to place it in motion, when the detached screen "severely sliced" the underside of his forearm, cutting a vein.
Not really fanboying apple here. The construction of a watch with glue to hold the screen in, it IS rather bad design not gonna lie.
The screen on my 3+ year old apple watch popped off during an exercise session. I found the screen thankfully. And was able to buy the parts to fix it (fixed the crappy battery too)
What failed was the glue. It simply just popped off.
So I guess the apple watch really isn`t a quality timepiece built to last, and I was frankly surprised that a mere 3 years in it breaks. ALSO the battery... it was loosing juice so fast it was basically useless. I looked at the battery, it wasn`t deformed or swelling so def the glue.
All batteries from china are crappy, I thought everyone knew that already. At least 2 big jets, 747 and something else brought down by crappy lithium'swow. I might sell mine and go Samsung Watch.
crappy batteries from China.
Think one step more. Imaging you wake up in the morning and look down to your swollen watch and broke screen. Then you look at your wrist and fingers…I look down, see my watch battery has swollen and broken the screen. Two options for how to proceed: 1) carefully remove the watch so as to avoid injury, 2) make sure I cut myself on the obviously broken glass in order to initiate legal proceedings against Apple.
I was not suggesting that, if I were in the Android system, I'd probably have one.A friend of mine has had the same Samsung Watch for years and I thought it was cool. Made me think of getting an Apple Watch.
I wouldn't say Samsung Watches are bad.
I agree, my screen popped off while my Apple Watch Series 0 was charging over night, it could have been a fire hazard though as the watch was hot as hell when I removed it from the Apple ChargerWhile I have read here on MR about some folks experiencing swollen batteries, most seem to happen during charging and not while wearing the watch. Not questioning that it happened to this guy, but a class action suit does not seem appropriate.