What kind of QC guy allows metal-on-metal contact for pre-market anodized metal parts? How would they even keep track of production lots in this mess? And having a guy run around, plug in and out of this rats nest of wires would sink throughput times to rock bottom. I would expect all testing to be in-situ; in specially designed handling kits for exactly pre-determined amounts of time.
imagine if one of those chargers were generic.
Wow - this is terrible.
I've seen real mobile phone testing racks. Either this is fake, or these people have no idea of what they're doing.
Looks like is a real picture people. From what the sources tell us, this indeed is not a fake.
It looks like a baby nursery for young iPhones![]()
I work for Verizon. And I can assure you, this is exactly what testing looks like, unfortunately.
To me, it looks like a bunch of phones being given an initial charge before testing. If the battery has no charge, you just get a battery outline with a thin red strip on the left. So the phones need a little charge before function testing.
I've seen factories where they tested cheap chinese flash based MP3 players and they did the same thing as this. Same shelving with the metal bars for holding the product, ac strips with AC to USB adapters then plugged all the players in and left them there to charge up.
possibly because they are testing the behavior of variety of non-apple plugs and cables (not necessarily the phone itself).
.
Went to a BB to buy the 128 GB iPad and the woman kept trying to talk me out of it telling me that I only "need" 32-GB, how it is more than enough. I always despise when sales people try and tell me what I "need." I know what I want, shut up and give it to me. Turned out they didn't have the 128 or 64 GB.
Wow - this is terrible.
I've seen real mobile phone testing racks. Either this is fake, or these people have no idea of what they're doing.
Apple is one of the biggest and most known brand in the world. A lot of people in China (and around the world) want iPhones, if only because of the brand appeal, but can't afford them.
So? Wouldn't you use a reference of some kind when you are testing something? Maybe that device is running separate diagnostic software.
I have developed my own notebooks, and I know what goes in testing.So? Wouldn't you use a reference of some kind when you are testing something? Maybe that device is running separate diagnostic software.
Just think of the effort it would take to make this picture as a fake and what kind of benefit it would create for the maker. Do you really think it makes sense buying or building an installation with 50 loaders, producing fake iPhone 5c's cycling through diagnostics and putting them in some kind of shelve structure, just to confuse some people on Mac discussion boards?
Just because you don't understand what is going on doesn't make it fake.
See my comment about three posts up. It makes sense if you have ever been in a scale-up testing facility or R&D facility.
It is not fake.
I see this as an arranged leak to be honest, also really not sure about white and black, didn't the white 3gs have a black front though?
Time will tell if these are real or fake.
These are PRE-PRODUCTION models...models that are built with the proposed assembly line, and then tested a thousand different ways. This is to determine that the ASSEMBLY LINE ITSELF is functioning and ready to start churning out in the millions.
. Testing facilities should be meticulous and orderly, not the harum scarum garage sale set up depicted in the photo which is why I think it's either fake or mislabeled. THAT is my point.
who fkng cares about those plastic pieces...
im more interested in the new 5s features... if there is more than a fingerprint homebutton...
we have no leaks about further features? havent we?
What another company does isn't the same as knowing what Apple does. Even if this is Apple's style you really think with all their talk of quality etc they wouldn't have serious security in place to prevent this kind of photography so their sloppy looking methods are exposed.
----------
Why would Apple leak something that is so sloppy that it makes them look bad. Even if it was their style they would have set up something clean and pretty with all the phones lovely in a tidy row, clearly all Apple cables etc and leaked that. And barred any mention of knockoffs etc
Went to a BB to buy the 128 GB iPad and the woman kept trying to talk me out of it telling me that I only "need" 32-GB, how it is more than enough. I always despise when sales people try and tell me what I "need." I know what I want, shut up and give it to me. Turned out they didn't have the 128 or 64 GB.
Your first mistake is that you're thinking that Apple is doing the testing and the leaking, and you're wrong in both cases. The photo is coming from Pegatron, a manufacturer for Apple.
Sure, Apple may spend millions on pristine facilities with perfect rows and custom-made racks that perfectly fit each and every prototype and lining them up in orderly perfection, and then lock it down in fortress-level security so no one ever, ever sees it (unless Apple choses to place a well-staged photo in a keynote presentation for the press). But they are R&D, and very small prototype runs for concept testing and verification. Pegatron and Foxconn however, are in the business of production... inexpensive, voluminous mass production, using laborers that are paid amounts which wouldn't earn them a rented closet to sleep in if they were paid the equivalent amount in a more developed nation.
That means they are going to use methods which work for them, and work quickly. The production lines aren't going to look clean and pristine enough to do surgery in, and the testing racks are probably gonna look a lot like the one in the leaked picture.
And sorry to tell you this, but, the picture is realistic, and also reflects the results. Remember the Quality Control debacles that plagued the iPhone 5 at launch? Scuffs, buttons that didn't line up? Yeah... that's Pegatron and Foxconn's handiwork. One could say what Apple should be INCAPABLE of producing such large amounts of problematic hardware, because of their attention to detail. But again... it's not Apple that is ultimately producing the phones. And when you're told to churn out millions and millions of phones in short order to satisfy people waiting in line, that's what you're gonna get.
Could Apple demand that Foxconn and Pegatron make more perfect, more sterile, more OCD-satisfying facilities? Maybe. But guaranteed your iPhone will cost at least 3 times more, and there would be lot fewer of them available for sale.
Is the picture that of a bunch of iPhone 5Cs? I don't know. But I can say that it is very accurate of how manufacturers under contract test their products. If that doesn't fit with your fairy tale visions of how your precious Apple products should be nurtured with white gloves from production line to box, then I'm sorry to burst your bubble.
possibly because they are testing the behavior of variety of non-apple plugs and cables (not necessarily the phone itself).
.