It wasn't your opposing opinion that led me to the finger wagging but this in your original response to my post:
Feels like finger wagging to me telling people who disagree with you to get up with the times.
I'm up on the times -- early adopter and all. But what I tire of is people who are willing to cheer on "less" in what should be a full featured product, and is a premium priced one, because it's new and shiny.
Yes, people complain.... because they are getting significantly less for their money and more inconvenience and why? Because Apple wants an even thinner machine than its already thin machine? If there was a practical reason I think people would be more accepting.
Can you make a substantive argument why a $2K+ laptop shouldn't offer a wider variety of ports than one 50-25% less expensive? From your last post you can't except that Apple knows best. But of course Apple wants to gut the ports... then buyers have to buy a dongle or two. Cha-Ching. But that doesn't make it a better user experience, which is what Apple still claims is one of its missions.
And if you find the complaining tiresome why do you subject yourself to it?
Okay, I was finger wagging.
The thing is...I don't see very many people here (if any) cheering on this potential, new MBP that you feel is less than what it should be. The overwhelming amount of posts here are filled with criticisms of what they think the next MacBook Pro is going to offer, or rather not offer. The overall vibe is resoundingly negative. Almost everyone is extremely upset for some reason, whether it be about the lack of ports, or the omission of MagSafe, or the fact that it is probably going to be thinner, or they are unhappy about the OLED touch bar that they feel will be gimmicky, or they are unhappy about the very real chance of no dGPU, etc. Overall, I really don't see much cheering going on to be honest.
Apple is building this machine for consumers, because that's who actually buy the vast majority of these machines, and not professionals. For instance, I just graduated college at the end of December, and nearly every student had a 13" rMBP despite the fact that they were not professionals. If you go to the Apple Store and see the sessions at the store where they teach people about their computers, you'll see all of these people with 13" rMBP's who know nothing about computers (ergo, not pros) learning how to use their machines. I don't think that these people will be extremely inconvenienced or feel like they are getting less. When push comes to shove, the MacRumors target audience is not really the target of the MBP anymore.
I don't think you would like my arguments that I could make about why it might make sense for a laptop that costs over $2000 to offer less ports. However, I will certainly try and give you one. For instance, a 2016 MBP with USB-C only could be more future proof and provide more utility in the long run than one that offers other ports. Sure, it might be inconveniencing today, but what about tomorrow? Lots of people keep their Macs for 3-5 years. If they included less USB-C in exchange for USB-A, HDMI, mDP, then in three years when you have more up-to-date peripherals, those old ports might be useless to you and you might wish you had more USB-C. In two to three years, I might be connecting to an external display via Thunderbolt 3 and have flash drives and external hard drives that connect via USB-C. In my life, most of my technology is getting old and I am looking to replace it with the most cutting edge things. I would much rather buy an adapter and deal with the inconvenience at first. That way, I can get it out of the way and have things work out better in the long run when I replace my old, aging USB 2 external hard drive with one that connects via USB-C. Others may be different, but I am always looking out years in advance, and in my opinion, it makes more sense to buy a MBP with a much more versatile, modern USB-C. There is a transition involved here as the industry switches to USB-C, and it's possible that Apple is doing what they can to provide a better user experience.
I don't think that Apple knows best. In fact, take a look at the "Apple Made Me Buy A Windows HP Workstation" in the Mac Pro forum and see my replies to a guy who switched to Windows. You'll see that I think Apple makes asinine decisions and applaud his decision. When it comes to the MBP, however, I was just trying to look at things from Apple's perspective, which is important as they are ones who have all of the control. I think that Apple believes that the overwhelming majority of their notebook consumers do not use HDMI or the SD card reader (and they are probably correct), which is why they feel comfortable removing them from the machine. I don't see this particular decision as a money grab.
I subject myself to the complaining because I've been coming here to read and talk about Apple products for almost eight years now, and it's not easy for me to just up and leave, no matter how much I dislike the current atmosphere.