Though I would say part of the praise should go to marketing department (or if you want photographer/art director) for creating a very well well lit and framed photo including the choice of what is shown on the display.To be honest, this looks pretty cool.
Samsung has definitely getting more design centric lately.
For the first shot at foldables it seems like they did a good job.
... because Samsung created this first and did most of the heavy lifting on developing the tech?
How about both? Meaning a foldable phone that has a display on the outside as well. Want to use it one-handed like most current phones? Just keep it folded and use the 'outer' display. Need more screen real estate and be willing to use both hands, unfold it and you get a small tablet.I am more interested in phones with display on both sides. Foldable...? Most likely not. And definitely not one running Android
This seems like a classic example of ability over practicality - it exists because they wanted to make one, but doesn’t seem to serve any practical or functional reason. Phones fit the hand. Want something bigger, use a tablet.
Oh well, time will tell...
Comments are salty as hell. I can't even imagine how loved would be Apple for doing this. It's a breakthrough tech and it's just sad some of you can't accept that.
Funny that most companies are in the frontier of innovation (even if it’s still useless) while Apple is struggling to make a proper keyboard on the MacBooks and yet have the balls to ask $2000...
It’s our fault, it’s my personal mistake by blindly purchasing overpriced junk from this company.
View attachment 822679
It will be more refined but that’s because Apple won’t release theirs for years. At the same time Samsung and others (huwawei, Xiaomi) will be refining their own foldable phones. They won’t be sitting in a vacuum and likewise Apple won’t release a polished foldable phone this year.It’s not the tech, it’s the implementation.
If and when Apple uses folding screen tech, you know it will be more refined.
It’s ultimately about the experience found with the device, and not the initial buzz from the media, that will determine its trajectory. And the experience ultimately lies in a company’s ability to integrate both hardware and software together, not just about pure hardware specs in a vacuum.
That’s bull. You know nothing yet, the phone isn’t even out. Besides Samsung aren’t the only company making products I don’t want, I don’t want a foldable phone from Apple either, I want a smaller phone which they are not selling yet, and making such a phone foldable would make the phone thicker and larger. I just want a nice, reliable small phone.
I don’t even trust Samsung to make a reliable non-folding phone. When S5 came out it had a heavily marketed splash/dust proof feature and after day one the bottom port cover, which helped make this feature possible, fell off on my friend’s brand new S5 and Samsung wouldn’t fix or replace it. And the note 5, selling sticks of dynamite and wouldn’t admit wrongdoing for months? Crappy company.
Don’t like it, don’t buy it and just move over
Oh, yeah, sure -- always carry a backpack with you so that you can always have "the right device for the task" with you... Instead of just carrying ONE gadget with you. That Apple/Steve Jobs marketing mantra has always made total sense -- for Apple's cash flow at least.
Oh, yeah, sure -- always carry a backpack with you so that you can always have "the right device for the task" with you... Instead of just carrying ONE gadget with you. That Apple/Steve Jobs marketing mantra has always made total sense -- for Apple's cash flow at least.
If you think Apple would automatically get accolades around here for anything, you must be new.Comments are salty as hell. I can't even imagine how loved would be Apple for doing this. It's a breakthrough tech and it's just sad some of you can't accept that.
... because Samsung created this first and did most of the heavy lifting on developing the tech?
Blah blah. Your opinion.Funny that most companies are in the frontier of innovation (even if it’s still useless) while Apple is struggling to make a proper keyboard on the MacBooks and yet have the balls to ask $2000...
It’s our fault, it’s my personal mistake by blindly purchasing overpriced junk from this company.
View attachment 822679
As a concept it isn’t. But as presented, it’s thick as heck, questionably pocketable (at least rear pocket), hard to imagine a workable case so get ready for screen damage, 2-3x the price of a standard sized phone. I’m ready to see this thing but I’m also expecting lackluster sales and lots of warranty claims.I can't understand why people are so negative towards this. A foldable phone has some great benefits. The notion that this is a solution trying to find a problem doesn't make sense. At its most simple level, you can use the device as a normal phone as you would today but also have the option to use it with a much larger screen when you want....how is that bad?
Comments are salty as hell. I can't even imagine how loved would be Apple for doing this. It's a breakthrough tech and it's just sad some of you can't accept that.
Without pioneers there wouldn’t be a polished product. Both approaches are crucial and deserve credit. Without all the pioneering work Apple would not have been able to make the first iPhone. However Apple should also be given credit for putting all the different technologies together into a useable product.Samsung wants to be the first because for them it’s a marketing tool. They will use the technology as soon as possible, even if the technology is not quite ready for a decent user experience.
Samsung did smartwatches before Apple but they were... questionable.
Samsung wants to be the first, Apple wants to be the first to get it right. Both approaches have some risk.
It’s not the tech, it’s the implementation.
If and when Apple uses folding screen tech, you know it will be more refined.
It’s ultimately about the experience found with the device, and not the initial buzz from the media, that will determine its trajectory. And the experience ultimately lies in a company’s ability to integrate both hardware and software together, not just about pure hardware specs in a vacuum.