I came to realization that phones will never be as cool as they were in 2012.
But maybe I am doing something wrong? I have 17 Pro, but for my tasks I would have been ok with 17e, a cheap iPhone version.
Chase price instead of chasing brands!
There are not so many good Android smartphones that will perform as good as 17e. That’s without mentioning that modern Android smartphones are a disgrace to their own legacy: these phones have no radios, no minijacks, no microSD card slots (which is a BIG deal), cheap models don’t even offer something as basic as wireless charging or NFC. I mean, iPhone has no radio or microSD either, but then the question is why pay same price for something that has same functionality but offers significantly worse user experience? Apple clearly wins here since they offer all-in-one device and competitors still playing “copy-paste” games and do not offer any interesting features that would make me even look at their devices.
It doesn’t matter how bad iOS 26 is, the phone itself is a good value product. Only single camera (which is ENOUGH for 95% of users), enough storage, good screen, good grip, all communications and even MagSafe now. Should have waited and grabbed that instead of 17 Pro.
I don’t want LiDAR or ultrawide camera. But let’s be honest: this phone is good only because of 4x/8x camera, though that isn’t as good as it was marketed. It will lose focus in low light and often makes blurry images.
As for cameras, all modern phones, no matter the brand, make ugly plastic HDR images. What is the point of having Samsung or Pixel instead of an iPhone? Photos would be nearly identical thanks to aggressive algorithmic photography.
Having said that, I would still grab an iPhone because it is what I got used to. There are no rivals in terms of using it for communication. FaceTime, iMessage, other apps work much better on iOS, despite general UI sluggishness that iOS 18 and 26 have brought. Though photo management is much better on Android devices, iOS Photos app is a joke.
P.S: upgrading to newer phone should not be done on yearly basis unless you are on a plan or have a very sweet discount for your older model. I’ve used my 11 Pro until I cracked screen, and if I fix it the phone will still work as before. Planning to do the same with 17 Pro and not interested in useless upgrades in the next 5-8 years from now, unless they make compact phone similar to old iPhones (5/5s/SE).
UPD: since there are many phones now with full 1 inch sensor (Vivo and Xiaomi models specifically) and lots of megapixels (Samsung) I want to address that too. And no, they are not winners. Camera is not just about the sensor size. It is about processing, color science and individual sensor designs. I’ve seen a few real examples of recent Xiaomi 17 Pro Ultra.
The guy who made the
video said he shot it completely on this phone. What can I say? iPhone shoots same plastic-looking videos. Dunno about other people, I cannot see clear advantage of this 1’ sensor that would make me “shut up and take my money!”. I think that processing means much more these days than sensor size, with poor processing they can make even the best camera module look like a toy camera.
And oh, btw. If someone wants phone only to take photos and videos, GoPro Mission 1 will be available in stores starting May 28. And it would be 600$ for the cheapest version. Caveat? It can shoot REAL and pure 8K30 or 8K60 OPEN GATE (!) in Pro version (which is 700$ afaik). Or you can get the ILS version and slap a proper MFT lens on it, how cool is that? Can any smartphone match that? Google is playing their upscaling games and Samsung having limitations here and there