what a tease...
We'll I've been lurking this forum for a while now reading up on the rumors and such and I don't think it has helped much. I guess its the very nature of rumors, but I've been getting very disappointed with the lack of reliable information about the release of 10.5. I don't believe this is this site's fault, I think it is a side-effect of the very little information about 10.5 Apple has released since the original presentation in August of last year.
I use Windows at home and Linux at work and I've been anxiously waiting (and saving) for 10.5 to come out and "do the switch" ever since the announcement in August.
I've been tempted to buy my MacBook (high-end white) already many times without waiting for 10.5 to come out, but I eventually decide to wait. I want my new Mac to come factory-installed with 10.5 along with 10.5 restore disks, and iLife '07, etc.
Problem is, I heard the MacBooks will take about a month after Leopard's release to begin shipping with the new OSAnd as much I would love to have my new Mac soon, I believe Apple will take until the end of spring to release Leopard. If that's June, that means that the earliest I can do the switch would be mid to end of July of 2007. Oh well, I guess I should stop reading so many rumors and focus on other things until July comes around...
Also, I just went to an Apple store and asked the first salesperson that came to see if I needed any help: "Yes, I'm looking for the 12" sub-notebook MacBook Pro" The guy just smiled and said, well that's a rumor so I can't say anything about it.![]()
If Apple finally updates the Screensaver Prefence Panes, that's reason enough to buy Leopard.
We'll I've been lurking this forum for a while now reading up on the rumors and such and I don't think it has helped much. I guess its the very nature of rumors, but I've been getting very disappointed with the lack of reliable information about the release of 10.5. I don't believe this is this site's fault, I think it is a side-effect of the very little information about 10.5 Apple has released since the original presentation in August of last year.
I use Windows at home and Linux at work and I've been anxiously waiting (and saving) for 10.5 to come out and "do the switch" ever since the announcement in August.
I've been tempted to buy my MacBook (high-end white) already many times without waiting for 10.5 to come out, but I eventually decide to wait. I want my new Mac to come factory-installed with 10.5 along with 10.5 restore disks, and iLife '07, etc.
Problem is, I heard the MacBooks will take about a month after Leopard's release to begin shipping with the new OSAnd as much I would love to have my new Mac soon, I believe Apple will take until the end of spring to release Leopard. If that's June, that means that the earliest I can do the switch would be mid to end of July of 2007. Oh well, I guess I should stop reading so many rumors and focus on other things until July comes around...
Also, I just went to an Apple store and asked the first salesperson that came to see if I needed any help: "Yes, I'm looking for the 12" sub-notebook MacBook Pro" The guy just smiled and said, well that's a rumor so I can't say anything about it.![]()
also waiting until santa rosa come out before getting my first mac, so my wait might be longer. I just have a feeling new designs all-around is coming soon. on the new laptops I expect multi-touch trackpad replacement.
If it's a new Finder (and that's where my money is) it's likely that's when we'll see the new UI, new features (tabbed windows), and faster file access. I tend to think that's the most likely thing as we've seen virtually no change the in Finder in the leaked screenshots and I can't think of a release of OS X that didn't have significant changes to the Finder.
Yes, Photoshop CS3 should be expected to run well on Leopard.
But remember, many other developers have copies of Leopard so they can also build their applications for it. This doesn't necessarily mean that CS3 will coincide with Leopard's release...though we all wish it were likely!
-=|Mgkwho
If they do replace Finder, I hope it has improved reliability for accessing network shares (whether SMB or WebDAV -- I've never tried connecting to an AFP share, but I trust for that at least Finder is stable).
Macs are not more expensive than equivalent PCs. That doesn't mean that there aren't PCs that are both cheaper and more expensive than Macs--there are only a handful of Apple models.Didn't you get the memo?.. All the mac fanatics have been saying all along that macs are not more expensive than PC's (whenever of course someone like me points out to them why more people buy Dells than overpriced macs)
Yeah, we know. I was making fun of your indignation and outrage over triviality.Uhh.............. No, I don't matticus. Macrumors does this for us already, wiseguy.
When has a Mac ever been updated just because of a video card? (Hint: never). There's no rush for more cores--if you actually need 8 cores right now, then feel free to buy some OEM Xeons from Newegg and drop them in. Apple isn't going to jump through your hoop every month because of a minor change in hardware availability. They're not a standard PC manufacturer. It's not unusual for there to be 9 month update intervals.No new Xeons? Ever heard of quad-core?? How about video cards? I am quite sure there are newer and better cards on the market than the X1900XT.
No. Just no. There's an almost immeasurably huge difference between those scenarios. You can't launch a product for a market that huge without your product actually working on any of it--it's illegal, not to mention abysmally stupid.It wouldn't be the first time now would it? WWDC will release the beta and give hardware manufacturers some time.![]()
Well Mr. Dee, I think we almost all can agree that Leopard will be released in Spring!!
Yay Woz!
-=|Mgkwho
Northern. I don't understand why this is an issue. It's as ridiculous as the 10.4.10 "debate."Spring..........on the Northern, or Southern hemisphere?
Northern. I don't understand why this is an issue. It's as ridiculous as the 10.4.10 "debate."
Except that, as you said below, the Finder issues have been there for a long time and they still have not fixed it. I'm going to still be disappointed if they don't fix it this time, but I'll actually be quite excited if they do -- setting the bar low there.Even if we had no hints one way or the other, I think assuming that an improved Finder is on its way would be perfectly reasonable.
It would be very hard for me to believe that someone at Apple hasn't decided it's time to address the Finder's shortcomings. At one time, it was merely annoying. By now, it's bordering on unacceptable.
Northern. I don't understand why this is an issue. It's as ridiculous as the 10.4.10 "debate."
Leopard is scheduled for an (American/northern hemisphere) Spring release. That means, quite literally, that the release date will fall between March 21st and June 20th. None of this iffy "I think Spring has started" nonsense--seasons have defined dates. Companies don't make date predictions based on what the weather is like outside. They use a calendar.
The definition of seasons is based on the orbital position of the planet and the timing of the equinoxes, not on any terrestrial weather conditions. Global warming wouldn't change anything. California enjoys spring-like weather from January onward--even if the whole planet was like that, Spring would still be March 20/21 to June 20/21.Well, you know, with global warming and all, the definition of when Spring actually occurs might have to be re-established.....
The definition of seasons is based on the orbital position of the planet and the timing of the equinoxes, not on any terrestrial weather conditions. Global warming wouldn't change anything. California enjoys spring-like weather from January onward--even if the whole planet was like that, Spring would still be March 20/21 to June 20/21.
I didn't even delve into its performance. I use Windows XP and Mac OS X about 50-50 at work and I'd be lying through my teeth if I didn't say that Windows Explorer really kicks the Finder's *ss. Every aspect of OS X is great except that. It's a glaring gaffe in an otherwise beautifully designed operating system. Even if we had no hints one way or the other, I think assuming that an improved Finder is on its way would be perfectly reasonable. The Finder is truly wretched in terms of performance when set side-by-side with Windows Explorer. Believe me, I hate typing that. I wish it wasn't true.
It would be very hard for me to believe that someone at Apple hasn't decided it's time to address the Finder's shortcomings. At one time, it was merely annoying. By now, it's bordering on unacceptable.