Why do they keep the best builds internal though? Or is it just that they can't be bothered to seed every build?
I still don't get the rationale for paying $500-$4500 per Developer license to then violate the NDA on BitTorrent.
I know that some dismiss it as a conspiracy theory, but compared to the info and access that we ADC members received during the Jaguar/Panther/Tiger development runs, we've been practically shut-out for Leopard and the seeds that have been provided have been buggy and surprisingly unstable for 'day-to-day' use.
If Leopard is going to hit shelves by June 21, either they're going to be burning the midnight oil in Cupertino, or Apple's holding out on us.
That is so plausable. It is easy to leak and distribute software in this day and age. Why would Apple allow someone the chance to leak/distribute a copy of the most anticipated OS in years? They probably have features broken up into several departments to keep one person from leaking a full copy. The rabbit hole goes deep on this topic. 🙂
Apple was very,
very upset with the unknown ADC members who posted Tiger developmental builds on various P2P networks -- it had happened with prior OS's (Hotline was big in the OS9 era), but it had never been so widespread, nor was is so immediate -- many times, the ADC seeds were uploaded before the vast majority of ADC members had even received the Seed email from Apple.
developers out there please correct me if I understand this the wrong way, but if I was a developer I would be seriously annoyed with getting seeds with the same issues and no substantial changes over a long period of time.
It is frustrating, especially when you spend that amount of money and feel that you're not getting the access you paid for... all because some morons had to boost their online geek cred.
It's part of the reason that I'm not renewing my personal ADC Premiere membership and my employer has decided not to renew theirs accounts at this time.
I'm also curious if
Adrian Fogge has considered that the seed notes are covered by the NDA, which means he violated the agreement by posting to InsanelyMac?