Interesting, but I don't think that you're correct
This sounds like Win16 support was available before 3.0 to me....
_________________________
But the true moral of your story is even more worrisome for Apple - a 32-bit OS died because it could seemlessly run 16-bit applications.
So much for the idea that the masses will choose the "better" applications.
OS/2 Warp History says:Phil A. said:Not strictly true - OS/2 was a dying operating system with virtually no applications at version 2. IBM released Warp (version 3) in a last desperate bid to save it. Unfortunately, they added Windows 3.x support just before MS released Windows 95 (for which it had no support)
"OS/2 2.x won over many Windows 3.x users because of it's [sic] ability to run Windows programs seamlessly, while maintaining a stable system, something that Windows had trouble doing. IBM even went so far as to trademark the term "Crash-Proof.""
This sounds like Win16 support was available before 3.0 to me....
_________________________
But the true moral of your story is even more worrisome for Apple - a 32-bit OS died because it could seemlessly run 16-bit applications.
So much for the idea that the masses will choose the "better" applications.