It sounds like OS X peaked at Tiger.
Tiger works for me. In fact, I probably wouldn't have upgraded my G4 PB from 10.2 (whatever that was called) to Tiger if I didn't have to (some software I was using required it).
Now that I'm on a MBP Tiger works well with what I'm using - mostly Aperture, Photoshop, iMovie HD and Final Cut Express - in addition to all the other usual stuff.
To me it sounds like the biggest feature is time machine. I don't really care about time machine as I have my own (manual) backup process - which I do on a regular basis.
Are there any real improvements to Leopard over Tiger? And are they worth spending the $100 for?
Tiger works for me. In fact, I probably wouldn't have upgraded my G4 PB from 10.2 (whatever that was called) to Tiger if I didn't have to (some software I was using required it).
Now that I'm on a MBP Tiger works well with what I'm using - mostly Aperture, Photoshop, iMovie HD and Final Cut Express - in addition to all the other usual stuff.
To me it sounds like the biggest feature is time machine. I don't really care about time machine as I have my own (manual) backup process - which I do on a regular basis.
Are there any real improvements to Leopard over Tiger? And are they worth spending the $100 for?