I beg to differ. Tried them and they were just as horrible as the other big companies. Wanted close to $2500 for a single small Subaru in San Francisco. Ridiculous. In Boston, same car cost me $1400 to ensure through one of Liberty Mutual's daughter companies. LM itself was pretty awful too, in my experience. High costs and increases for no reason whatsoever.
The cheapest one I got here is Costco/Ameriprise. Was under $2K. Still very overpriced but nobody could do less.
If you're paying that much to insure a Subaru, you probably have a driving record that deserves those higher rates.
It isn't just that. Look at the
LOCATION. It obviously is going to cost a hell of a lot more to insure a car in a higher density population city than it would in a rural area. Just by nature of moving from Omaha to Las Vegas caused my insurance on a 1995 Chevrolet S-10 Blazer to go up from $400/year to $475 every 6 months, and I made that move in 1998. Not taken into account is:
- probability of car being stolen,
- probability of car being in an accident based on number of people in the area,
- wear/tear on the car given the conditions of the area,
- road conditions in the area,
- cost of living, and
- density of the population.
Good case study: compare the cost of insurance for someone in their mid 20s, excellent driving record, in the entire metropolitan Des Moines, Iowa area, against someone living in Alhambra, Bellflower, or Whittier, in Los Angeles, that has a freeway commute to/from work. I'll guarantee you there is at least a good $400 difference in insurance.
BL.