Not sure why you'd think a second vendor would help stabilize cost to consumers. It hasn't thus far and Apple has multiple vendors for multiple components. Yet prices still rise.
He means there will be stable increase in price
Not sure why you'd think a second vendor would help stabilize cost to consumers. It hasn't thus far and Apple has multiple vendors for multiple components. Yet prices still rise.
Didn't make their lcd panels indistinguishable, or the Qualcomm/Intel modems, or...This won’t make a difference at all. The panels are made according to Apple’s specifications, and Apple’s hardcore quality control will probably make Samsung vs. LGs panels indistinguishable.
Apple’s history of visually distinguishably panels in Macs doesn’t support this assumption.This won’t make a difference at all. The panels are made according to Apple’s specifications, and Apple’s hardcore quality control will probably make Samsung vs. LGs panels indistinguishable.
Tell that to the LG MacBook Air displays.
But the only phone sized OLEDs they’ve made so far have been widely panned.Those aren’t OLED displays, LG OLED TVs are king.
This won’t make a difference at all. The panels are made according to Apple’s specifications, and Apple’s hardcore quality control will probably make Samsung vs. LGs panels indistinguishable.
Seems like all Live Wallpapers are low quality. Including the ones included for iPhone 6S and iPhone X.
They are supposed to be $90 each, so that is a massive amount of 36 million dollars. Not enough for production, and too much for a trial.Just 400,000 panels? That’s not even a single day’s worth of iPhone sales. Seems inconsequential, unless you are an LG stockholder, and even then it’s a relatively minuscule amount of revenue.
That makes more sense.OLED-Info is reporting that these LG panels will not be put into new phones but will be used for replacement parts. If you don't want an LG screen - don't drop your phone!