Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
$1499 24" UHD pro display please

It's been like 10 years and they never released a succssor to the 27" thunderbolt display which was super popular in TONS of creative offices

Apple seriously needs to get back in the monitor game. The $6k XDR is nice but doesn't make sense for most of the market.
 
So there's at least an A chip in there, if not M1/M1Max. Tha fascinating part is what could happen with those in there.

Computer-monitor processing i.e. XGrid?

"Graphics chip" in the monitor itself? That can work with the computer, i.e. XGrid?
 
  • Like
Reactions: macsplusmacs
So there's at least an A chip in there, if not M1/M1Max. Tha fascinating part is what could happen with those in there.

Computer-monitor processing i.e. XGrid?

"Graphics chip" in the monitor itself? That can work with the computer, i.e. XGrid?

that's what is interesting.

I have the 64 gig max cores m1max. say i buy the 32" pro display with some GPU cores in it. Is there a point if my GPU cores if they are in the display? can they process side jobs or node jobs in Blender 3D etc? or would the internal GPU just do display-related color and hz things?

Exciting and unknown possibilities right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MysticCow
Maybe the internal chip is just a MAME emulator?

Galaxian2Large.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: joneill55
What would A13 do in a display though?

While the original report from 9to5Mac mentioned the A13, the report they were working off of said if would be an "Apple SoC" and since the A13 was the latest SoC at the time, that is what 9to5Mac concluded.

So it is possible that instead of an off-the-shelf A series SoC, this could be a custom Apple SoC designed specifically for this display ("D1"?) and handle tasks like calibration, Airplay support, image processing, etc.
 
Really hope Apple gets back in the display business.

We have thousands of beautiful Macs plugged into ugly Dell, Samsung, and LG displays. The office looks like a marketing display for these companies, not Apple.
 
Last edited:
While the original report from 9to5Mac mentioned the A13, the report they were working off of said if would be an "Apple SoC" and since the A13 was the latest SoC at the time, that is what 9to5Mac concluded.

So it is possible that instead of an off-the-shelf A series SoC, this could be a custom Apple SoC designed specifically for this display ("D1"?) and handle tasks like calibration, Airplay support, image processing, etc.

8.9 Billion color correction checks per second. ~ apple marketing

Becomes the display for photographers and graphic designers.

? who knows.
 
Please, please minimal bezels, I would really like the resolution of a 27" iMac in three nice displays with minimal bezels. Or the new iMac Pro in the middle with a display next to it that matches the look on each side.
 
It would not surprise me if Apple comes out with an iMac that they call pro but is less expensive than the old pro just to have a consumer/prosumer model that raises the entry price for a high end iMac closer to Macbook pro levels. Then a year later after introducing the new Mac pro, come out with another imac model that has an even bigger screen and and even bigger starting price. $6,000. And is equipped with all the speed of the mac pro without any of the expandability. Which would technically be a bargain compared to the mac pro which doesn't come with a screen but also starts at $6,000. Seems like Apple is moving to a consumer - prosumer - and professional 3 tiered system. Essentially bumping up the entry level price of what they call Pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mabhatter
I don't know how different a screen with an M1 (or whatever variant they use) will be from an iMac? I guess get rid of storage, the wifi/bluetooth controllers, etc. Maybe have the GPU cores help with graphics, while the CPU cores do the basic screen stuff. The latter seems like overkill, though.

Even then, I don't know how much an improvement having the chip in there will have since most Macs by then will already have an M1 (or better) chip in them. If the screen's M1 & the Mac's M1 could work in conjunction, maybe. That or making an M1 Super-Mega-Ultimate variant with a boatload of GPU cores. Even then, would a thunderbolt connection be able to take full advantage? Thunderbolt 3 / 4 is only what, a PCIe 3.0 x4 connection? Considering many video cards now are up to PCIe 4.0 x16, I don't know if an eGPU could ever be fully taken advantage of until Thunderbolt meets at least that. Who knows what'll it be like once PCIe 5 really takes hold.
 
Just give me a screen like the 2021 Macbook one at 27 or 32 inches and I'll be happy. HDR is nuts on it and the contrast is good enough even compared to OLED.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shibamigo
A 24" OLED 1440p60 w/ Rec.2100 support & priced right would get my IMMEDIATE attention !

LG wants $4000 for their 32" OLED and $3000 for their 27". ASUS has a 22" OLED, but they also want $4000 for it. So not sure what "priced right" means, but if it is ~$2000... maybe in a couple of years?

Samsung is also going to have a 34" QD-OLED, but I would not be surprised if that one was at least $5000, if not more.
 
Last edited:
So there's at least an A chip in there, if not M1/M1Max. Tha fascinating part is what could happen with those in there.

Computer-monitor processing i.e. XGrid?

"Graphics chip" in the monitor itself? That can work with the computer, i.e. XGrid?
According to your signature, looks like you should be old enough to remember the System X supercomputer? That was pretty awesome. I'd be curious to see how Apple would design servers (hardware & software) nowadays with Apple Silicon & Swift. Unfortunately, probably not enough margin & volume to do that, though.
 
According to your signature, looks like you should be old enough to remember the System X supercomputer? That was pretty awesome. I'd be curious to see how Apple would design servers (hardware & software) nowadays with Apple Silicon & Swift. Unfortunately, probably not enough margin & volume to do that, though.

Hey Siri, tell new Apple display to Unzip XCode on it.

;)
 
So are they not going any larger with the replacement iMac for the Intel 27 inch? that would be disappointing; would have liked to see it go up to 32 inch. Anyway, not in a rush for a cheaper Apple branded display; and we Apples version of cheaper is probably $1,500. I also got a 24 inch Dell that looks almost brand spanking new from work that was heading to ewaste.
 
I would love the choice between an MBP + external monitor(s) vs. a 27" (or larger) iMac to actually be a tough decision.
 
If LG can get the design right this time they could be on to a winner.
Edit: it's an "Apple branded" display... which means no inputs for multiple machines or non-Mac devices. Now I'm sad.

I was liking the LG UltraFine ones but they were ONLY Thunderbolt which won't work for me because I have many PCs crammed in a small desk space that all share two monitors.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ijbond
What would A13 do in a display though?
it could act as an Airplay display just like a built-in Apple TV, or it could be used for the Secure Enclave for Face ID, ISP for the webcam, the gpu could offload the UI from being rendered on the Mac. All kinds of things.
 
Hopefully gen 2 of these things will have faceID in them, sometime in the next few years. 🤞🤞

Thinking about getting a 49" ultra wide monitor for my incoming 16" MBP, although now I might have to reconsider...
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.