That will teach them.Boycotting this third party travesty until Apple brings back a proper refreshed 5k Thunderbolt Display.![]()
That will teach them.Boycotting this third party travesty until Apple brings back a proper refreshed 5k Thunderbolt Display.![]()
Wasn't the 15" MacBook Pro 2015 GPU model suppsed to support one 5K monitor?
What happened to that? Sorry, we were kiddin'?
I hope Apple does but not holding my breath. Apple seems to completely gave up on displays and desktop Macs. I hope I am terribly wrong. I would buy two 5K displays and a MacPro in a heartbeat.Boycotting this third party travesty until Apple brings back a proper refreshed 5k Thunderbolt Display.![]()
Digital display at lower resolution = junk.
Okay. Have fun with that...Boycotting this third party travesty until Apple brings back a proper refreshed 5k Thunderbolt Display.![]()
No. The 2015/2016 MacBook does not have Thunderbolt.@MacRumors Does the 5K display with with 2015, 2016 MacBook (retina) at all? There are no mentions of this pairing.
I was going to say "Get an iMac if you want an Apple 5K display", but I see from you signature you already have a 5K iMac.Boycotting this third party travesty until Apple brings back a proper refreshed 5k Thunderbolt Display.![]()
Apple Thunderbolt 3 (USB-C) to Thunderbolt 2 adapter and a Thunderbolt 2 cable. Put the Thunderbolt 3 end into the display and then use the Thunderbolt 2 cable to connect to the adapter to your Mac.And what kind of adapter would be required? There was no word on that.
Thunderbolt 2 and Thunderbolt 3, which one would be male and which one female?
Because this display is Thunderbolt 3 and the Mac Pro has been neglected for ever so is still on Thunderbolt 2.Why does the MacPro (late 2013) tech specs page say "Connect up to Three 5K displays" if it won't connect to even one of these properly?
The Mac Pro can't support 5k resolution. Apple sure has their priorities straight...![]()
And what happens to those of us that bought the nMP already? Funny how Apple gave us a machine that can't be expanded and is limited in what displays it can run even though it has a monster dual GPU...
Why would anyone pay ~1k for a 5K display then run it (poorly) at 4K resolution? Argh.
The Mac Pro can't support 5k resolution. Apple sure has their priorities straight...![]()
From the Mac Pro tech specs "Connect up to Three 5K displays". Apple needs to get it's act together!
And what kind of adapter would be required? There was no word on that.
Thunderbolt 2 and Thunderbolt 3, which one would be male and which one female?
On another note, totally would have bought one if they had a regular thunderbolt 2 or displayport input. Not sure why Apple insists on even their production partners to limit the ability of their products from working with as many different computers as possible
Thanks for the reply.It does if you have one of the what, two or three, 5k displays that allow multiple signal inputs. You have to use both thunderbolt ports to get 5k using my computer... this doesn't allow for that.
And what kind of adapter would be required? There was no word on that.
Thunderbolt 2 and Thunderbolt 3, which one would be male and which one female?
Why would anyone pay ~1k for a 5K display then run it (poorly) at 4K resolution? Argh.
This is a little ridiculous for me. I was considering one of these for my Mid 2015, but it looks like there's no benefit in going with anything better than the old cinema display. In fact it may be better since I can use the cinema display with TB2.
I think Tim said all male.
There isn't a Xeon out there that provides for this over one cable yet (thanks for the clarification, @Brookzy). The Skylake Xeons over 4 cores are due out next year. It's not Apple, it's Intel.The Mac Pro can't support 5k resolution. Apple sure has their priorities straight...![]()