Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No, no, no, no. 8K is not enough. Not buying it until it’s 16K or 32K.

Nice mountain wallpapers though.
 
Last edited:
that screen covers alot of realestate but Sony top's them with a 98inch i just saw at my local Best Buy for $69,999.00
6331619_sd.jpg;maxHeight=640;maxWidth=550
 
  • Like
Reactions: anthonymoody
I know they would never announce this, but I'd love to know the sales figures for stuff like this. Do the uber rich even care about stuff like this?I can't imagine any normal working person is going to spend that kind of money lol.
 
Not really the best comparison. Your linked TV is 4K. The feature TV is 8K. I think that's where cost difference lies. Comparatively, Sony and Samsung have 98" 8K TV's for approx. $70K and neither are OLED. Their 85" models clock in between $13K-$16K.
LG's OLED 8K is the first of it's kind so it has first of it's kind first adopter bleeding edge pricing.
 
No one in their right minds would put a tv in front of a view like that. What a stupid image.
 
That is a relief.

Ordered this and forgot to check if it was HomeKit compatible. What a relief.
Hope I can fit it my McLaren to get it home.

[/sarcasm]
I purchased a helicopter in order to purchase that TV. Flying to my château right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BusanAA
I’ve never understood why 15% more surface area costs 6x more when it comes to TVs.

I assume you are comparing the 77" to the 88" in which case it's ~30% more area with a ~15% bigger diagonal.

Now that said the cost really comes down to yields and the size of the manufacturing process. Typically there are X number of defects per X number of surface area. The bigger the screen the more likely they are going to have to throw out a panel as it will be defective, which is really what is driving up the costs. Also some large panels aren't efficient for certain production sizes because what they do is make one large piece of glass and cut it, so some larger sizes waste a lot of glass because they can't be efficiently titled across to use all the glass like smaller panel sizes more often can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mousekiks
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.