It's both!I thought 4K was the resolution, not the price 🤭
It's both!I thought 4K was the resolution, not the price 🤭
LOL
Kinda like when the first con man met the first fool.
Religion was born.
or when apple made a crazy overpriced round computer that no 3rd party parts work with.
4 k for a monitor .... only for fools!
Lol of course you have a Memoji avatarCall me what Apple makes one.
Yup. That 24” was terrible. Not only was it power PPI but lower resolution too. 2160x3840 instead of 2304x4096.Even the LG 22" (which like the other early UltraFines was a quasi-official Apple monitor) was discontinued ages ago and replaced with a 24" with no-mans-land PPI (219 -> 186).
So yes, even companies who definitely knew how to do it properly for Macs have pretty much given up now. I guess the subtext is that there aren't enough potential customers who actually care either.
It's not the PPI that counts, it's the angular resolution, which is a function of PPI and viewing distance. Once you move beyond a laptop/mobile where the viewing distance is fixed by the length of your arms, then, well:The whole point of a monitor is to have high PPI.
Well, it distracts from the ridiculous $200 VESA adapter that you'll need if you forgo the $1k stand. It's not as if it would have been hard to blend 4 threaded bolt holes into that steampunk design - making a high-end display that doesn't have a VESA mount is just ridiculous (and, yes, that includes having to buy a special stand-less version of the iMac if you want VESA).And people laughed at Apple 2 years ago... Ok the £1K monitor stand is stupid money.
This is a joke? 32” OLED 4K display 250 nits for $3999, when the 48” LG CX 4K TV is $1299 (sale).
Get yourself the LG CX OLED 48" for $1000. Runs Great on my Mac Mini M1 at 5K 60Hz Resolution
$4,000 and only 250nits? No HDMI2.1 and it’s features? Are they delusional?
Good, But I already own this LG CX OLED and have no desire to own a $4K monitor, clearly this New LG Monitor is not meant for us.Your CX is garbage when compared to this. This LG screen has true RGB pice layout which compares to $30.000 Sony HX310 when it comes to image accuracy.
Get yourself the LG CX OLED 48" for $1000. Runs Great on my Mac Mini M1 at 5K 60Hz Resolution
It's not the PPI that counts, it's the angular resolution, which is a function of PPI and viewing distance. Once you move beyond a laptop/mobile where the viewing distance is fixed by the length of your arms, then, well:
...and anyway, you don't buy an OLED over an LCD at a huge premium based on PPI and how much code you can fit on the screen, you buy it for colour, contrast ratio, dynamic range when working on images and video, for which a larger screen, further away often makes sense.
Also, last I looked, OLED still had burn-in issues that might not be a problem in normal TV where you don't generally leave the same image displaying for long periods - but using one as your primary monitor that was likely to be displaying the menu bar, desktop icons, the tool palette of your regularly-used software etc. every waking hour, so using a high-end TV as a secondary display for previewing HDR content makes even more sense.
No noticeable lag with a 4K external display on my M1 MBA. Scaled to the middle option (equivalent of 2560 x 1440).Whenever I use 4K screens i get input lag, general slowness- like the response time of a TV.
Both 2013 trash can Mac and my 2019 MacPro. I guess this is due to the software scaling i use?
Guessing people are fine scaling a 5k iMac with no performance hit, but a scaled external 4K on a Mac Pro doesn’t work out so well?
Do you guys have any thoughts? I’ve been wanting to run 4K monitors for a professional setup with Logic for 5 years, and it just never seems to perform..
It's not the PPI that counts, it's the angular resolution, which is a function of PPI and viewing distance.
...and anyway, you don't buy an OLED over an LCD at a huge premium based on PPI and how much code you can fit on the screen, you buy it for colour, contrast ratio, dynamic range when working on images and video, for which a larger screen, further away often makes sense.
Your setup looks sweet. I have an older LG OLED TV (55"), and when my MBA is hooked up to it, it looks absolutely amazing. People here are obsessed with numbers. If it looks good to your eyes, then it looks good.Good, But I already own this LG CX OLED and have no desire to own a $4K monitor, clearly this New LG Monitor is not meant for us.