The bezels don't bother me. It's the 5K I am after. You probably don't buy these as furniture?
Weird, I thought it was the non-Apple crowd who was all about the spec and completely ignored aesthetic value.
The bezels don't bother me. It's the 5K I am after. You probably don't buy these as furniture?
No. It's a 27" 5K monitor.So, $1300 for a 27" 4K monitor? LG is drunk off of the Apple Kool-Aid. They should have renamed it UltraFine 5K*.
Imagine having the most svelte and streamlined tablet on the market connected to a fugly bezel-thick monitor that looks like it came out of a ca. 2007 accounting firm. The resolution would be the least of my concerns.
Yeah they look great but throttle the minute you do real work on it. Look how great my flaming slate is!!!But nothing is as beautiful and aethetically pleasing as apple stuff. Nothing.
Third World Problems.
But nothing is as beautiful and aethetically pleasing as apple stuff. Nothing.
Third World Problems.
Yeah they look great but throttle the minute you do real work on it. Look how great my flaming slate is!!!
The fact that people here are obsessing about the look of this monitor rather than the 5k demonstrates 1) these people care only for aesthetics 2) dont do actual work on their computers 3) probably can’t afford the display in the first place.
This isn't an Apple product. Calm down.Provoke all you want, but Apple WAS about both form and function. Think Cinema Display (RIP). Speaking as a design director who's been working all day with Macs for the last couple decades and can afford to buy the whole lineup a few times over. I'd rather buy something that doesn't offend my eyes. What's your point exactly?
Steve, you are so missed.
This isn't an Apple product. Calm down.
This isn't an Apple product. Calm down.
So to be clear the previous generation 5K display was unable to handle an iPad Pro 2018 connected to it? Can anyone verify this? I've read the previous generation 4K display worked fine with iPad Pro 2018.
Or go the AT&T route and call it 5KE (5K Evolution).So, $1300 for a 27" 4K monitor? LG is drunk off of the Apple Kool-Aid. They should have renamed it UltraFine 5K*.
They don’t think it’s a problem, despite the opinion of those triggered by its asymmetry.What problem has LG with not making the bezels symmetrical??
Provoke all you want, but Apple WAS about both form and function to an impeccable degree. Think Cinema Display (RIP). Speaking as a design director who's been working all day with Macs for the last couple decades and can afford to buy the whole lineup a few times over. I'd rather buy something that doesn't offend my eyes. What's your point exactly?
Steve, you are so missed.
As I too dislike the webcam I'd say it is a nice looking display for most people. Specs are the bigger selling point her.Yep.. that's just you![]()
The real problem is there are no other 27” 5k displays on the market. If Apple isn’t, I wish Dell or someone else who knows how to at least make symmetrical bezels would make one.
Ugly bezels. Looks like cheap plastic casing, too.
What does any of your above rant have to do with the fact that USB doesn’t have sufficient bandwidth to support 5K? Or did you post to the wrong thread?Timmeh! Driving Apple into the ground one day at a time all in the name of shareholder love. What made them great was leading and being so ahead that they had time to revise their new designs and also why Jonny probably loved it there. When we have someone we work with that we gel with, it stops being work and is something better...
I can't help but assume what they are now is a empty shell given the competition is now usually the first to implement so many things that are new and Apple puts their "twist" on it.
Timmeh! Driving Apple into the ground one day at a time all in the name of shareholder love. What made them great was leading and being so ahead that they had time to revise their new designs and also why Jonny probably loved it there. When we have someone we work with that we gel with, it stops being work and is something better...
I can't help but assume what they are now is a empty shell given the competition is now usually the first to implement so many things that are new and Apple puts their "twist" on it.
What does any of your above rant have to do with the fact that USB doesn’t have sufficient bandwidth to support 5K? Or did you post to the wrong thread?
What makes you think USB has sufficient bandwidth to carry 5K video? LG can do exactly zero to change that fact.So, $1300 for a 27" 4K monitor? LG is drunk off of the Apple Kool-Aid. They should have renamed it UltraFine 5K*.
Provoke all you want, but Apple WAS about both form and function to an impeccable degree. Think Cinema Display (RIP). Speaking as a design director who's been working all day with Macs for the last couple decades and can afford to buy the whole lineup a few times over. I'd rather buy something that doesn't offend my eyes. What's your point exactly?
Steve, you are so missed.
I decided to look it up as a cheaper alternative. I can’t believe you seriously compared a 3840x2160 monitor to a 5120x2880 monitor. All 5120x2880 or even 5120x1440 are in that price range.I'll stick with my Acer VG270K 4K IPS that cost me under £300 new....